Genetic insights into species diversity and taxonomy of Ulva (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) in coastal Korea

Article information

Algae. 2026;41(1):17-35
Publication date (electronic) : 2026 March 15
doi : https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2026.41.3.3
1Phycology Research Group and Center for Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
2Department of Biology, and Research Institute for Basic Sciences, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Korea
3Department of Aquaculture and Aquatic Science, Kunsan National University, Gunsan 54150, Korea
4Meise Botanic Garden, 1860 Meise, Belgium
*Corresponding Author: E-mail: myungskim@jejunu.ac.kr, Tel: +82-64-754-3523, Fax: +82-64-756-3520
Received 2025 November 24; Accepted 2026 March 3.

Abstract

The green macroalgal genus Ulva is widely distributed, ecologically important, and serves as a versatile bioresource. In South Korea, where Ulva species are utilized as edible seaweeds, challenges such as low production and the impact of green tides on aquaculture and marine ecosystems are evident. Recognizing the limitations of morphology-based taxonomy, there has been a shift towards the integration of DNA-based methods for species delimitation and identification. This study addresses the gaps in understanding Ulva diversity in Korean coastal areas by analysing species based on three genetic markers (tufA, rbcL, and ITS) alongside detailed morphological analyses. Our findings unveiled 14 Ulva species through sampling, including first records of U. aragoënsis, U. iliohaha, U. lacinulata, and U. partita. When combined with one previously published DNA-confirmed species, our findings bring the total number of Ulva species confirmed by molecular data in Korea to 15, thereby refining and expanding current knowledge of Ulva diversity in the region. Wide morphological variation was observed within some Ulva species, such as U. conglobata and U. australis, as well as overlapping morphological traits that blurred the boundaries between several species having a rosette-like form, revealing intriguing patterns of form variation. This study establishes a molecular taxonomic baseline for Ulva in Korea and provides new insights into the morphological plasticity of the genus across environmental gradients.

INTRODUCTION

Ulva Linnaeus, consisting of over a hundred recognized species (Tran et al. 2022, Guiry and Guiry 2025), is a globally distributed genus of green macroalgae with important ecological roles and diverse applications. Species within the genus are valued as human food, as fertilizers and biostimulants for plant growth, as sources of ulvan extracts, and for their contributions to bioremediation and integrated multitrophic aquaculture (Neori et al. 2000, Alves et al. 2013, Dmytryk and Chojnacka 2018). In light of increasing global demand for sustainable resources, Ulva stands out as a versatile bioresource due to its wide geographical range, rapid growth, and ease of cultivation (Charrier et al. 2017).

In South Korea (hereafter Korea), Ulva species are traditionally harvested as a traditional food source (Sohn 1998, Hwang et al. 2020). Recent cultivation efforts have included several species such as U. clathrata (Roth) C. Agardh, U. compressa Linnaeus, U. intestinalis Linnaeus, U. linza Linnaeus, and Ulva prolifera O. F. Müller, although aquaculture production remains relatively limited (Hwang et al. 2020). However, amid the benefits Ulva provides, certain species are associated with the formation of green tides, a phenomenon increasingly prevalent along Korean coastlines in recent years (Kim et al. 2004, Park 2014, Lee et al. 2019). These green tides negatively affect aquaculture, tourism, and the marine ecosystem (Kwon et al. 2017).

Accurate species identification is essential in applied research and aquaculture, given the pronounced interspecific variation in growth dynamics and biochemical profiles among Ulva taxa. Furthermore, a robust taxonomic framework underpins sustainable aquaculture practices and is pivotal for managing Ulva species associated with green tides for ecological monitoring and coastal resource management. Ulva exhibits two primary morphotypes: blade-like (commonly known as sea lettuce) and tubular (gut weeds). Traditional taxonomy, relying on limited morphological features, has encountered challenges and misidentifications due to pronounced morphological variation and plasticity within the genus (Tran et al. 2022). To overcome the limitations of morphology-based identification, modern taxonomy has integrated DNA-based techniques for more precise and reliable Ulva species identification (Kraft et al. 2010, Kirkendale et al. 2013, Pirian et al. 2016, Lee et al. 2019, Tran et al. 2023). Despite their ecological and economic importance, Ulva species diversity and distribution in Korea based on DNA data remains poorly understood, with only a few DNA studies, notably those by Kang et al. (2019) and Lee et al. (2019), which examined the genetic diversity of Ulva in Jeju Island.

In Korea, 20 Ulva species have been reported based on morphological criteria (Bae 2010, National Institute of Biological Resources 2022) (Supplementary Table S1). More recent DNA barcoding studies focused on Ulva diversity in Jeju Island (Kang et al. 2019, Lee et al. 2019), shedding light on regional diversity. Kang et al. (2019) identified nine species using tufA and ITS markers, namely U. arasakii Chihara, U. australis Areschoug, U. californica Wille, U. compressa, U. flexuosa Wulfen, U. laetevirens J. E. Areschoug (synonym of U. lacinulata [Kützing] Wittrock), U. ohnoi M. Hiraoka & S. Shimada, U. procera (K. Ahlner) H. S. Hayden, Blomster, Maggs, P. C. Silva, Stanhope & Waaland (synonym of U. linza), and U. torta (Mertens) Trevisan (Supplementary Table S1). This study noted the disagreement, identifying several samples using these two markers separately, and lacked morphological data to complement the results of the DNA analysis. Lee et al. (2019) combined tufA and rbcL genes with morphological analyses to identify five blade-like species, U. australis, U. lactuca Linnaeus, U. laetevirens, U. ohnoi, and a new species, U. pseudo-ohnoi H. W. Lee, J. C. Kang & M. S. Kim (Supplementary Table S1). Despite these advances, data on tubular Ulva species in Korea remain scarce, and information on the diversity and distribution of Ulva species beyond Jeju Island is still highly incomplete.

The high similarity of rbcL sequences between U. pseudo-ohnoi (from Jeju), U. conglobata Kjellman, and the Japanese specimen Ulva sp. 1 (Matsumoto and Shimada 2015, Lee et al. 2019, Hughey et al. 2021) led to the suggestion that these taxa were conspecific (Tran et al. 2022). This synonymy was later confirmed by Carneiro et al. (2023) and is now reflected in AlgaeBase (Guiry and Guiry 2025). Despite genetic similarity, morphological distinctions are notable: specimens of U. pseudo-ohnoi collected from different localities in Jeju display a blade-like thallus featuring ruffled margins and substantial irregular growth expansion (Lee et al. 2019), while Ulva sp. 1 and specimens of U. conglobata exhibit rosette-like morphological features (Matsumoto and Shimada 2015). The consistently intraspecific morphological variation observed in this species complex raises questions about the factors driving such morphological diversity and whether current genetic markers provide sufficient resolution to delineate species boundaries accurately, especially among closely related species.

Therefore, this study aims to: (1) systematically assess Ulva species diversity using three DNA markers and broad sampling covering the major coastlines of South Korea; (2) provide detailed morphological descriptions for each species to elucidate intra-specific variation and inter-specific overlap; (3) specifically resolve the genetic and morphological relationships within the U. conglobata complex; and (4) update the checklist of Ulva species in Korea and discuss their distribution patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling and specimen processing

Our comprehensive dataset included 130 Ulva specimens examined both genetically and morphologically (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table S2), including 51 specimens collected in 2023 from the coastal regions of Jeju Island, Geoje, and Tongyeong, in the south coast of Korean peninsula, and 79 Ulva herbarium specimens housed at the Jeju National University Herbarium (JNUB) collected during expeditions spanning 2017 to 2023. The JNUB specimens were prepared as vouchers for other studies, including investigations on bloom-forming species (2017–2018) and bioactivity evaluations of Ulva species (2021–2023). The former study focuses on Jeju Island, while the latter study covers Jeju Island (Hallim-eup, Seongsan, Udo, Biyangdo), Namildae (Sacheon-si, Gyeongsangnam-do), Yeongdeok, Uljin (Gyeongsangbuk-do), Yangyang (Gangwon-do), Ulleungdo, and Taean (Chungcheongnam-do), representing the western, southern, and eastern coasts of Korea and its offshore islands. None of the sequences of the specimens in these two studies has been previously submitted to NCBI or published. Fresh specimens were stored in a cool bag and transported to the laboratory immediately after collection. For each fresh specimen, a small fragment was thoroughly washed in clean seawater to remove epiphytes, followed by careful drying and preservation in silica gel for subsequent DNA extraction. The remaining portion was mounted and dried as herbarium sheets and deposited at JNUB.

Fig. 1

Sampling map of Ulva specimens across Korea, including both newly collected and herbarium samples, used in this study.

Molecular data acquisition

Approximately 1 cm2 of fresh thallus or 0.5–1 cm2 of dried thallus, depending on specimen availability, was used for each DNA extraction. Total genomic DNA was extracted using the MagPurix Plant DNA Extraction Kit v.1.3 (P02014; Zinexts Life Science Corporation, New Taipei City, Taiwan). AccuPower PCR Premix (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol for all PCR reactions. Three genetic markers were amplified employing the forward primer of Hayden et al. (2003) and the reverse primer and PCR conditions described in Blomster et al. (1998) for ITS, and Saunders and Kucera (2010) for rbcL and tufA. Primer sequences and annealing temperatures for all three markers are listed in Supplementary Table S3. A total of 89 ITS sequences, 92 tufA sequences, and 92 rbcL sequences were generated (Supplementary Table S2).

Phylogenetic analyses

Only unique Korean haplotypes (30 ITS, 28 tufA, and 49 rbcL), identified using CD-HIT (threshold 0.999) (Huang et al. 2010) on the public Galaxy platform (Mareuil et al. 2017), were included in further analyses. Public sequences from GenBank, including the closest BLAST hits of the Korean sequences, were added to the datasets of the three markers. Species from Umbraulva E. H. Bae & I. K. Lee, Percursaria Bory de Saint-Vincent, and Ulvaria Ruprecht were used as outgroup taxa. Alignments were constructed using the MAFFT online server using default settings (Katoh and Standley 2013) and subsequently inspected and trimmed manually in MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018). The final alignment lengths were 620 bp (316 variable sites, 256 parsimony-informative sites) for ITS, 607 bp (206 variable sites, 159 parsimony-informative sites) for tufA, and 972 bp (224 variable sites, 134 parsimony-informative sites) for rbcL. Single gene maximum likelihood (ML) analyses with ultrafast bootstrapping (1,000 replicates) were conducted using the IQ-TREE v. 1.6.12 on the web server (Trifinopoulos et al. 2016), with the best-fit partitioning schemes and models of molecular evolution selected using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) criterion using ModelFinder integrated in IQ-TREE (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017).

Representatives of each species clade, chosen based on the closest related sequences identified in the single gene phylogenies and curated names in the literature and/or GenBank, were included in the concatenated sequences (tufA + rbcL + ITS) (Supplementary Table S4). Since only a short fragment of rbcL (110 bp) is available for the U. conglobata lectotype, and this fragment has been shown to fall within the same clade as Ulva sp. 1 (Matsumoto and Shimada 2015, Hughey et al. 2021), we used Ulva sp. 1 and specimen JNU0871 as representatives for this lineage. This approach avoids the instability caused by extremely short sequences while still preserving the phylogenetic placement of the lectotype. For the ML phylogenetic analysis, the best-fit partitioning schemes by gene and models of molecular evolution determined using the BIC criterion in ModelFinder integrated in IQ-TREE were TPM3u + F + I + G4 for tufA, TPM3u + F + I + G4 for rbcL, and TIM + F + I + G4 for ITS.

Morphological observations

Both freshly collected and herbarium specimens underwent meticulous examination, with morphological features recorded, encompassing external morphology, including size, shape of the thallus, branches, and holdfast, as well as cell characteristics such as size, shape, arrangement in different parts of the thallus, number of pyrenoids per cell, and chloroplast positions. Herbarium specimens were rehydrated following in-house protocols using warm water with a small amount of detergent or, for some samples, a mild buffer solution. Microphotographs were taken using a microscope (BX43; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an EOS 600D digital camera (Canon, Tokyo, Japan) at magnifications ranging from 10× to 100×. Cell dimensions were measured directly from calibrated microphotographs, using the smallest and largest values observed across all specimens examined to represent the morphological range for each species.

RESULTS

Single gene trees

The tufA phylogenetic tree resolved the Korean sequences into 12 well-supported species-level clades (Supplementary Fig. S1). Of these, seven were blade-like Ulva species, identified as U. adhaerens Kaoru Matsumoto & S. Shimada, U. arasakii, U. australis, U. californica, U. lacinulata, U. ohnoi, and U. pseudo-ohnoi, among which U. australis emerged as the most prevalent species in our dataset. The remaining five species were identified as tubular species, namely U. aragoënsis (Bliding) Maggs, U. compressa, U. linza, U. torta/clathratioides, and an unidentified species.

The rbcL phylogenetic tree delineated 13 species, exhibiting similarity with the tufA gene-based phylogenetic tree, albeit with lower support values (Fig. 2). Notable differences with the tufA results included the identification of a specimen from the Udo channel at a depth of 15–20 m as U. iliohaha H. L. Spalding & A. R. Sherwood. Because no tufA sequence was obtained for this specimen, this identification could not be verified in the tufA-based analysis. Additionally, the unidentified tubular species in the tufA phylogenetic tree clustered with sequences of U. partita K. Ichihara described from Japan (pairwise intraspecific divergence 0.11–0.13%). A Korean specimen (U52_GD_SM_L_1), forming a clade with sequences designated U. californica in the tufA tree, did not cluster with other U. californica rbcL sequences but stood as a distinct clade. The rbcL sequence of the U. pseudo-ohnoi holotype and the specimen JNU0871 clustered within the same clade as the sequence of Ulva sp. 1 from Japan (representative for the U. conglobata type specimen) (pairwise intraspecific divergence 0%), affirming their conspecificity based on the rbcL gene.

Fig. 2

Maximum likelihood tree based on the rbcL alignment. Numbers at the nodes indicate UF bootstrap values for 1,000 replicates. Outgroup taxa were pruned out of the tree. The representative Korean sequences generated in this study are highlighted in bold.

The phylogenetic tree reconstructed using ITS sequences delineated 13 genetic groups (Supplementary Fig. S2), largely concordant with the results of the tufA and rbcL phylogenetic trees. The Korean specimen JNU0871, identified as U. pseudo-ohnoi in the tufA-based phylogenetic tree, instead clustered in the ITS tree with the Japanese Ulva sp. 1 and specimens identified as U. ohnoi, U. reticulata Forsskål, and U. spinulosa Okamura & Segawa (pairwise intraspecific divergence 0.002–0.22%).

Concatenated phylogenetic tree

Although there are discrepancies in the single gene trees (Supplementary Fig. S3), the concatenated phylogenetic tree of tufA, rbcL, and ITS confirmed the presence of 15 genetically distinct Ulva species in Korea, with all nodes well supported (UF bootstrap values mostly > 98) (Table 1, Fig. 3). The blade-like species included U. adhaerens, U. arasakii, U. australis, U. californica, U. iliohaha, U. lacinulata, U. lactuca, U. ohnoi, U. pseudo-ohnoi, and U. tanneri H. S. Hayden & Waaland. The tubular species comprised U. aragoënsis, U. compressa, U. linza, U. partita, and U. torta/clathratioides. Among these, four species, namely U. aragoënsis, U. iliohaha, U. lacinulata, and U. partita, are newly recorded in Korea.

Current understanding of Ulva species diversity in Korea based on molecular and/or morphological evidence

Fig. 3

Maximum likelihood tree based on the concatenated (rbcL, tufA, and ITS) alignment. Numbers at the nodes indicate UF bootstrap values for 1,000 replicates. Outgroup taxa were pruned out of the tree. The representative Korean sequences generated in this study are highlighted in bold.

In the concatenated phylogenetic tree, the sequences of the U. pseudo-ohnoi holotype (tufA + rbcL), the specimen JNU0871 (tufA + rbcL + ITS), clustered with the Japanese Ulva sp. 1 (rbcL + ITS). It provides further evidence that U. pseudo-ohnoi and Ulva sp. 1 are the same species.

Morphological observations

A summary of the morphology of specimens within the species complex Ulva conglobata, “U. pseudo-ohnoi” holotype, U. conglobata lectotype, Ulva sp. 1, and the newly collected U. conglobata JNU0871, is provided in Table 2. The “U. pseudo-ohnoi” holotype (blade-like morphology) from Jeju Island, Korea exhibit similarities in cell shape, thallus thickness, and chloroplast position with the U. conglobata lectotype, Ulva sp. 1 from Japan, and U. conglobata JNU0871. The primary differences are observed in the presence or absence of rosette-like gross morphology and denticulate margins.

Summary of morphological features of Ulva conglobata lectotype, Ulva sp. 1, U. pseudo-ohnoi holotype, and U. pseudo-ohnoi JNU0871

The featured morphology (gross morphology, surface view, and cross-sections of the middle part of the thallus) of five tubular and 10 blade-like Ulva in Korea is summarized in Table 3 and Figs 4 & 5. Additional morphological details, including morphological variation, surface view and cross-sections of the basal part of the 15 Ulva species from Korea are presented in Supplementary Text S1 and Figs S4S18. Based on these results and morpho-anatomical observations of Ulva specimens from Lee et al. (2019), we developed a preliminary identification key for Ulva species in Korea. While the key offers a practical field reference for ecologists and the general public, it should be used with caution. Due to the high morphological variation within Ulva species, it is best complemented with DNA analysis for accurate species identification. As further variations are documented, the key should be updated accordingly. Traits marked “(in part)” indicate morphologically overlapping species complexes.

Summary of morphology of Korean Ulva species

Fig. 4

Summary of morphology of five tubular Ulva in Korea. The featured morphology includes the whole thallus/thalli (A, D, G, J & M), the surface view (B, E, H, K & N), and the cross-section (C, F, I, L & O) of the middle thallus. (A–C) Ulva aragoënsis. (D–F) Ulva compressa. (G–I) Ulva linza. (J–L) Ulva partita. (M–O) Ulva torta/clathratioides. Scale bars represent: A, D, J & M, 1 cm; B, F, K, L, N & O, 50 μm; C, E, H & I, 100 μm; G, 2 cm.

Fig. 5Fig. 5

Summary of morphology of 10 blade-like Ulva in Korea. The featured morphology includes the whole thallus/thalli (A, E, I, M, Q, U, Y, CC, GG & KK), the surface views (B, C, F, G, J, K, N, O, R, S, V, W, Z, AA, DD, EE, HH, II, LL & MM), and the cross-section (D, H, L, P, T, X, BB, FF, JJ & NN) of the middle thallus. (A–D) Ulva adhaerens. (E–H) Ulva arasakii. (I–L) Ulva australis. (M–P) Ulva californica. (Q–T) Ulva conglobata. (U–X) Ulva iliohaha. (Y–BB) Ulva lacinulata. (CC–FF) Ulva lactuca. (GG–JJ) Ulva ohnoi. (KK–NN) Ulva tanneri. Scale bars represent: A, E, U, Y & GG, 2 cm; B, 200 μm; C, D, G, K, L, N–P, R, AA, BB, DD, II, JJ & NN, 50 μm; F, H, J, Z & HH, 100 μm; I, M, Q, CC & KK, 1 cm; S, T, V-X, EE, FF, LL & MM, 20 μm.

Key to the species of Ulva in South Korea

Diversity and distribution

Based on our sampling, we observed a slightly higher diversity of blade-like species in terms of both species richness and abundance compared to tubular species. Specifically, our study, along with previous studies, recorded 10 blade-like species in Korea, whereas only five tubular species were identified (Table 1). Among the blade-like species, U. australis (44) had the highest number of specimens and the widest distribution, being found from Ulleungdo, across the East and South coasts, to Jeju Island. Ulva lacinulata (5) was the second most widely distributed species, occurring along the East and South coasts and on Jeju Island. Ulva californica (3) was present along the East coast and Jeju. Seven other blade-like species, U. adhaerens (4), U. arasakii (7), U. lactuca (Lee et al. 2019), U. ohnoi (2), U. conglobata (previously known as U. pseudo-ohnoi) (2), and U. tanneri (3) were found in various locations around Jeju Island, except for U. iliohaha (1), which has so far only been observed in the Udo Channel, specifically in sandy bottom and rhodolith beds at depths of 5 to 15 m in turbid waters. It was recorded during our 2023 sampling period, and additional field observations in 2024 showed the same seasonal and habitat pattern. Among the tubular Ulva, U. linza (21) was found to be the most abundant and widely distributed species, ranging from Ulleungdo to the East and South coasts, as well as Jeju Island. Ulva partita (11) was observed in Ulleungdo, the South coast, and Jeju Island. Ulva compressa (7) was found in Ulleungdo, the East and West coasts, and Jeju Island. Ulva aragoënsis (5) was recorded on the South coast and Jeju Island. Finally, U. torta (2) was exclusively found on Jeju Island.

DISCUSSION

Expanding the knowledge of distribution and morphological variation of Ulva conglobata

A previous study of Hughey et al. (2021) noted genetic similarities between the rbcL sequences of the U. conglobata lectotype (Yokohama, Japan) and Ulva sp. 1 from a nearby locality (Yokosuka). Subsequently, Carneiro et al. (2023) formally synonymized U. pseudo-ohnoi with U. conglobata. Our phylogenetic analysis confirms that rbcL sequences of the U. conglobata lectotype formed a clade with U. pseudo-ohnoi holotype, Ulva sp. 1, and specimen JNU0871. Ulva sp. 1, U. conglobata, U. pseudo-ohnoi, and JNU0871 are also morphologically highly similar, providing additional evidence for their conspecificity (Table 3).

Our DNA-based findings extend the known distribution range of U. conglobata, previously reported only from Japan (Kjellman 1897, Hughey et al. 2021), to Korea. Based on morpho-anatomical analysis, Hughey et al. (2021) documented the distribution of U. conglobata across multiple localities in the western Pacific and Indian Oceans, and called for DNA analyses of rosette forms of Ulva outside of Japan to verify this range of U. conglobata. However, this rosette morphology is not unique for U. conglobata. A recent study in Vietnam further highlights the discrepancy between morpho-anatomical and DNA-based species identification, revealing that a specimen with rosette-like morphology was genetically identified as U. lactuca (Tran et al. 2023). Additionally, rosette-like morphology has been observed in other Ulva species, including U. tanneri, U. pertusa Kjellman (synonym of U. australis), and U. fasciata Delile (synonym of U. lactuca) (Matsumoto and Shimada 2015, this study). These findings demonstrate significant morphological overlap among species, and reinforce the necessity of molecular data for accurate species identification, particularly for taxa exhibiting high morphological plasticity. Existing records of Ulva with rosette-like morphology currently assigned to U. conglobata require reassessment using DNA-based methods.

The distinct morphological forms observed in U. conglobata, a large-bladed “U. pseudo-ohnoi” morphotype restricted to the upper subtidal zone (Lee et al. 2019), and a rosette-like morphotype confined to the upper intertidal, may reflect phenotypic plasticity in response to contrasting environmental conditions. This variation in thallus form, aligned with specific ecological niches, highlights the potential for environmentally induced morphological flexibility in U. conglobata. Although subtle genetic differences exist between these morphotypes, their biological significance remains unclear. These patterns raise the possibility that ecological factors could contribute to early divergence, but this requires further investigation. Differences in desiccation pressure, light regimes, or predation between intertidal (rosette form) and subtidal (blade-like form) habitats could influence both morphology and genetic structure. Further research, including genomic analyses and common garden experiments, are needed to determine the extent of genetic divergence and validate the hypothesis of incipient speciation within this intriguing species complex.

Integrative assessment of species diversity and distribution of Ulva in Korea

This study provides a comprehensive assessment of Ulva diversity along the Korean coast, integrating molecular and morphological approaches. Our findings confirm the limitations of morphology-based identification, given the high variability observed in Ulva species, and reinforce the necessity of molecular tools for accurate species delimitation and taxonomic classification. By analyzing three genetic markers (tufA, rbcL, and ITS) alongside morpho-anatomy features, we identified 15 genetically distinct Ulva species and provided detailed morphological descriptions for each species. Among these, there are 10 blade-like species: U. adhaerens, U. australis, U. arasakii, U. californica, U. conglobata, U. iliohaha, U. lactuca, U. ohnoi, U. tanneri, and U. lacinulata, as well as five tubular species: U. aragoënsis, U. compressa, U. linza, U. torta, and U. partita.

Species identification was based on DNA data from type specimens, obtained either directly or indirectly through validated reference sequences representing the type concept. This included the types of U. adhaerens, U. australis, U. californica, U. conglobata, U. iliohaha, U. ohnoi, U. lacinulata, U. lactuca, U. tanneri, and U. partita, as well as one recently combined species (U. aragoënsis), for which the sequence from the publication of establishing the new combination serves as a molecular reference of the current species concept (Krupnik et al. 2018). Because only short DNA fragments were recovered from the holotype of U. lactuca and the type specimen of U. australis, species identification was based on verified reference sequences. Ulva lactuca was identified using DNA from the lectotype of U. lobata (Kützing) Harvey, which has been demonstrated to be conspecific with U. lactuca (Hughey et al. 2019). Likewise, U. australis was identified using sequences of Australian material (Kraft et al. 2010) shown to be identical to the type specimen (Hanyuda et al. 2018). Although this study did not directly include sequences of type specimens of U. californica and U. tanneri because they were not available at the time of analysis, the identification of the analyzed lineages was anchored to publicly available reference sequences whose identities have been subsequently confirmed through comparison with type material (Hughey et al. 2024).

For the remaining five species, identification relied on integrative comparisons combining morphology, ecology, type locality, and DNA similarity to well-characterized reference collections (Shimada et al. 2003, Kraft et al. 2010, Steinhagen et al. 2019). The absence of DNA sequences from many type specimens, particularly tubular Ulva species, remains a major obstacle to taxonomic resolution. Although the number of sequenced type specimens has increased in recent years, some historical types will likely remain unsuitable for molecular analysis (Tran et al. 2022). While comparisons with modern reference material cannot provide absolute taxonomic certainty, they represent a pragmatic and reproducible framework for aligning molecular lineages with traditional species names and for facilitating future comparisons when type-derived DNA data become available (Hughey et al. 2024).

Our results largely confirm previous molecular and morphological records of Ulva in Korean waters while refining and correcting several species boundaries. Eleven previously reported species, U. arasakii, U. californica, U. adhaerens, U. australis, U. compressa, U. conglobata, U. lactuca, U. ohnoi, U. linza, U. torta, and U. tanneri, were genetically verified, confirming their taxonomic validity. Notably, U. torta shares a similar molecular species concept with U. clathratioides L. G. Kraft, Kraft & R. F. Waller, but the absence of type sequences for U. torta precludes confirmation of conspecificity. In this study, we adopt the name U. torta for this molecular species concept, as it has nomenclatural priority over U. clathratioides. Furthermore, we report four new Ulva records for Korea, including two blade-like species (U. iliohaha and U. lacinulata) and two tubular species (U. aragoënsis and U. partita). In contrast, our data indicate that U. pseudo-ohnoi is conspecific with U. conglobata.

Eight taxa previously recorded in Korea based on morphology, including U. flexuosa, U. clathrata, U. intestinalis, U. polyclada Kraft, U. prolifera, U. reticulata, U. rigida C. Agardh, and U. sublittoralis Segawa, were not genetically confirmed in our study. For example, U. flexuosa specimens identified by Kang et al. (2019) based on tufA and ITS sequences cluster with U. aragoënsis in our prior analysis (personal note), suggesting misidentification. The absence of other taxa in our data may represent true absences due to habitat-restricted or rare species not encountered during our sampling, or unresolved cases requiring molecular re-evaluation. These findings collectively update the checklist of Korean Ulva and provide a revised molecular framework for future taxonomic and ecological studies.

The known ranges of U. australis, U. aragoënsis, U. compressa, U. californica, U. lacinulata, U. linza, and U. partita are genetically confirmed to extend from Jeju Island to mainland coasts. Other species remain restricted to Jeju, with U. iliohaha recorded only from the Udo channel. This pattern may reflect denser sampling around Jeju, or genuinely higher diversity of Ulva in this marine diversity hotspot.

An interesting trend observed in our data is that a greater number of blade-like species were identified than tubular species, which contrast with patterns observed in Vietnam (Tran et al. 2023), subtropic-warm temperature regions of Japan (Ogawa et al. 2013), Australia (Kraft et al. 2010), and New Caledonia (Lagourgue et al. 2022). These regions situated in subtropical to tropical climates, where tubular Ulva diversity is often greater. Given that our sampling primarily targeted marine environments, whereas tubular species are more prevalent in brackish habitats, the low diversity of tubular taxa in Korea may reflect a sampling bias rather than a true biogeographical pattern. Broader surveys in estuarine and brackish systems will be necessary to evaluate this observation more rigorously and to enable meaningful regional comparisons.

This study represents the most comprehensive molecular assessment of Ulva diversity in Korea to date, identifying 15 distinct species and refining taxonomic classifications. Our findings underscore the importance of integrative taxonomy in resolving species boundaries within Ulva, particularly given the genus’s high morphological plasticity. These results have broader implications for ecological monitoring, aquaculture, and the management of green tides in Korea. Future research should focus on expanding sampling to brackish environments and conducting further molecular analyses to clarify the taxonomic status of morphologically identified species.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program (RS-2023-00247213, RS-2019-NR040080, and RS-2020-NR054743) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education of Korea, and the Marine and Fishery Bio-resources Center (2025) funded by the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK). Dr. Lan-Anh T. Tran sincerely appreciates the support of FWO for awarding grant number K222623N, which has made it possible for her to conduct this research in Korea.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary Table S1. Ulva species inventory in Korea prior to the study (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Table-S1.pdf

Supplementary Table S2. Ulva specimens collected in this study (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Table-S2.pdf

Supplementary Table S3. Details of primers used in this study (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Table-S3.pdf

Supplementary Table S4. Ulva sequences used in the concatenated phylogenetic tree (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Table-S4.pdf

Supplementary Text S1. Detailed morphological descriptions for all 15 Ulva species reported in the study.

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Text-S1.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S1. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree based on tufA gene (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S1.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S2. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S2.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S3. Comparison of phylogenetic trees inferred from the concatenated three-marker dataset (rbcL, tufA, and internal transcribed spacer [ITS]) and from each single marker individually for Korean species (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S3.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S4. Morphology of Ulva aragoënsis JNU0912 (A) and JNU0900 (B) (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S4.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S5. Morphology of Ulva compressa specimen JNU0932 (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S5.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S6. Morphology of Ulva linza specimen JNU0809 (A), JNU0903 (B), JNU0904 (C), and JNU810 (F) (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S6.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S7. Morphology of Ulva partita specimen JNU0899 (A) and JNU0865 (C) (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S7.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S8. Morphology of Ulva torta/clathratioides specimen JNU0875 (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S8.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S9. Morphology of Ulva adhaerens specimen JNU0936 (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S9.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S10. Morphology of Ulva arasakii specimen JNU0893 (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S10.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S11. Morphology of Ulva australis specimen JNU0869 (A), JNU0882 (B), JNU0874 (C), and JNU0873 (D) (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S11.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S12. Morphology of Ulva californica specimen JNU0806 (A–E) and JNU0807 (F) (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S12.pdf

Supplementary Fig S13. Morphology of Ulva conglobata specimen JNU0871 (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S13.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S14. Morphology of Ulva iliohaha specimen JNU0897 (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S14.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S15. Morphology of Ulva lacinulata specimen JNU906 (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S15.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S16. Morphology of Ulva lactuca specimen GD_DL_11 (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S16.pdf

Supplementary Fig S17. Morphology of Ulva ohnoi specimen JNU0938 (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S17.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S18. Morphology of Ulva tanneri specimen JNU0844 (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2026-41-3-3-Supplementary-Fig-S18.pdf

References

Alves A., Sousa R. A., Reis R. L.. 2013;A practical perspective on ulvan extracted from green algae. J. Appl. Phycol 25:407–424. doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9875-4.
Bae E. H.. 2010. Ulotrichales, Ulvales. In : Bae E. H., Kim H. S., Kwon C. J., Hwang I. K., Kim G. H., Klochkova T. A., eds. Algal Flora of Korea 1(1)National Institute of Biological Resources. Incheon: p. 7–52.
Blomster J., Maggs C. A., Stanhope M. J.. 1998;Molecular and morphological analysis of Enteromorpha intestinalis and E. compressa (Chlorophyta) in the British Isles. J. Phycol 34:319–340. doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1998.340319.x.
Carneiro V. A. R., Martins N. T., Albuquerque da Silva S. L., de Barros-Barreto M. B., Pereira S. B., Cassano V.. 2023;Revealing the diversity of the genus Ulva (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) in southeastern Brazil, with a description of Ulva kanagawae sp. nov. Phycologia 62:407–420. doi.org/10.1080/00318884.2023.2243433.
Charrier B., Abreu M. H., Araujo R., et al. 2017;Furthering knowledge of seaweed growth and development to facilitate sustainable aquaculture. New Phytol 216:967–975. doi.org/10.1111/nph.14728.
Dmytryk A., Chojnacka K.. 2018. Algae as fertilizers, biostimulants, and regulators of plant growth. In : Chojnacka K., Wieczorek P. P., Schroeder G., Michalak I., eds. Algae Biomass: Characteristics and Applications: Towards Algae-Based Products Springer International Publishing. Cham: p. 115–122. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74703-3_10.
Guiry M. D., Guiry G. M.. 2025. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication; Available from: http://www.algaebase.org. Accessed Mar 8, 2025.
Hanyuda T., Hansen G. I., Kawai H.. 2018;Genetic identification of macroalgal species on Japanese tsunami marine debris and genetic comparisons with their wild populations. Mar. Pollut. Bull 132:74–81. doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.06.053.
Hayden H. S., Blomster J., Maggs C. A., Silva P. C., Stanhope M. J., Waaland J. R.. 2003;Linnaeus was right all along: Ulva and Enteromorpha are not distinct genera. Eur. J. Phycol 38:277–294. doi.org/10.1080/1364253031000136321.
Huang Y., Niu B., Gao Y., Fu L., Li W.. 2010;CD-HIT Suite: a web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences. Bioinformatics 26:680–682. doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq003.
Hughey J. R., Gabrielson P. W., Maggs C. A., Mineur F., Miller K. A.. 2021;Taxonomic revisions based on genetic analysis of type specimens of Ulva conglobata, U. laetevirens, U. pertusa and U. spathulata (Ulvales, Chlorophyta). Phycol. Res 69:148–153. doi.org/10.1111/pre.12450.
Hughey J. R., Maggs C. A., Mineur F., et al. 2019;Genetic analysis of the Linnaean Ulva lactuca (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) holotype and related type specimens reveals name misapplications, unexpected origins, and new synonymies. J. Phycol 55:503–508. doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12860.
Hughey J. R., Miller K. A., Gabrielson P. W.. 2024;Genetic analysis of Ulva (Ulvaceae, Chlorophyta) type specimens resolves northeast Pacific blade-forming species. Bot. Mar 67:165–179. doi.org/10.1515/bot-2023-0072.
Hwang E. K., Choi H. G., Kim J. K.. 2020;Seaweed resources of Korea. Bot. Mar 63:395–405. doi.org/10.1515/bot-2020-0007.
Kalyaanamoorthy S., Minh B. Q., Wong T. K. F., von Haeseler A., Jermiin L. S.. 2017;ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14:587–589. doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285.
Kang J. H., Jang J. E., Kim J. H., et al. 2019;Species composition, diversity, and distribution of the genus Ulva along the coast of Jeju Island, Korea based on molecular phylogenetic analysis. PLoS ONE 14:e0219958. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219958.
Katoh K., Standley D. M.. 2013;MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol 30:772–780. doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010.
Kim K. Y., Choi T. S., Kim J. H., Han T., Shin H. W., Garbary D. J.. 2004;Physiological ecology and seasonality of Ulva pertusa on a temperate rocky shore. Phycologia 43:483–492. doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-43-4-483.1.
Kirkendale L., Saunders G. W., Winberg P.. 2013;A molecular survey of Ulva (Chlorophyta) in temperate Australia reveals enhanced levels of cosmopolitanism. J. Phycol 49:69–81. doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12016.
Kjellman F. R.. 1897;Marina chlorophyceer från Japan. Bih. Kongl. Svenska Vetensk.-Akad. Handl 23:1–44.
Kraft L. G. K., Kraft G. T., Waller R. F.. 2010;Investigations into Southern Australian Ulva (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta) taxonomy and molecular phylogeny indicate both cosmopolitanism and endemic cryptic species. J. Phycol 46:1257–1277. doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00909.x.
Krupnik N., Paz G., Douek J., et al. 2018;Native, invasive and cryptogenic Ulva species from the Israeli Mediterranean Sea: risk and potential. Mediterr. Mar. Sci 19:132–146. doi.org/10.12681/mms.2104.
Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C., Tamura K.. 2018;MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol 35:1547–1549. doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096.
Kwon H. K., Kang H., Oh Y. H., Park S. R., Kim G.. 2017;Green tide development associated with submarine groundwater discharge in a coastal harbor, Jeju, Korea. Sci. Rep 7:6325. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06711-0.
Lagourgue L., Gobin S., Brisset M., et al. 2022;Ten new species of Ulva (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta) discovered in New Caledonia: genetic and morphological diversity, and bloom potential. Eur. J. Phycol 57:458–478. doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2022.2027023.
Lee H. W., Kang J. C., Kim M. S.. 2019;Taxonomy of Ulva causing blooms from Jeju Island, Korea with new species, U. pseudo-ohnoi sp. nov. (Ulvales, Chlorophyta). Algae 34:253–266. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2019.34.12.9.
Mareuil F., Doppelt-Azeroual O., Ménager H.. 2017;A public Galaxy platform at Pasteur used as an execution engine for web services [version 1; not peer reviewed]. F1000Research 6:1030. doi.org/10.7490/f1000research.1114334.1.
Matsumoto K., Shimada S.. 2015;Systematics of green algae resembling Ulva conglobata, with a description of Ulva adhaerens sp. nov. (Ulvales, Ulvophyceae). Eur. J. Phycol 50:100–111. doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2014.994189.
Ministry of Environment, National Institute of Biological Resources. 2022. National list of species of Korea Ministry of Environment, Sejong and National Institute of Biological Resources. Incheon:
Neori A., Shpigel M., Ben-Ezra D.. 2000;A sustainable integrated system for culture of fish, seaweed and abalone. Aquaculture 186:279–291. doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00378-6.
Ogawa T., Ohki K., Kamiya M.. 2013;Differences of spatial distribution and seasonal succession among Ulva species (Ulvophyceae) across salinity gradients. Phycologia 52:637–651. doi.org/10.2216/13-199.1.
Park S. R.. 2014;Seasonal patterns and recruitment dynamics of green tide-forming Ulva species along the intertidal rocky shores of the southern coast of Korea. Ocean Sci. J 49:383–390. doi.org/10.1007/s12601-014-0035-4.
Pirian K., Piri K., Sohrabipour J., Jahromi S. T., Blomster J.. 2016;Molecular and morphological characterisation of Ulva chaugulii, U. paschima and U. ohnoi (Ulvophyceae) from the Persian Gulf, Iran. Bot. Mar 59:147–158. doi.org/10.1515/bot-2016-0009.
Saunders G. W., Kucera H.. 2010;An evaluation of rbcL, tufA, UPA, LSU and ITS as DNA barcode markers from the marine green macroalgae. Cryptogam. Algol 31:487–528.
Shimada S., Hiraoka M., Nabata S., Iima M., Masuda M.. 2003;Molecular phylogenetic analyses of the Japanese Ulva and Enteromorpha (Ulvales, Ulvophyceae), with special reference to the free-floating Ulva. Phycol. Res 51:99–108. doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1835.2003.00296.x.
Sohn C.. 1998. The seaweed resources of Korea. In : Critchley A. T., Ohno M., eds. Seaweed Resources of the World Japan International Cooperation Agency. Yokosuka: p. 15–33.
Steinhagen S., Karez R., Weinberger F.. 2019;Cryptic, alien and lost species: molecular diversity of Ulva sensu lato along the German coasts of the North and Baltic Seas. Eur. J. Phycol 54:466–483. doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2019.1597925.
Tran L-AT, Leliaert F., Vieira C., et al. 2023;Molecular assessment of Ulva (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) diversity in Vietnam including the new species U. vietnamensis. Phycol. Res 71:13–24. doi.org/10.1111/pre.12507.
Tran L-AT, Vieira C., Steinhagen S., et al. 2022;An appraisal of Ulva (Ulvophyceae, Chlorophyta) taxonomy. J. Appl. Phycol 34:2689–2703. doi.org/10.1007/s10811-022-02815-x.
Trifinopoulos J., Nguyen L.-T., von Haeseler A., Minh B. Q.. 2016;W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W232–W235. doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256.

Article information Continued

1a. Thalli filamentous, tubular to compressed, with entirely or partly (basal or marginal) hollow thalli 2
1b. Thalli flat, linear to rounded blades; 2 cell layers thick throughout 6
2a. Thalli are basally tubular with flat and hollow upper margins 3
2b. Thalli filamentous or tubular throughout 5
3a. Thalli often have bubbles within cell layers, cells irregularly arranged in surface view, mostly rectangular with rounded edges U. compressa
3b. Cells in surface view are locally arranged in longitudinal and/or in transverse rows 4
4a. Cells in surface view are rectangular or angular, columnar in cross-sections U. aragoënsis
4b. Cells in surface view are quadrangular cells with rounded edges, and cuboidal cells in cross-sections U. linza (in part)
5a. Polygonal cells, locally aligned in longitudinal and vertical rows U. partita
5b. Quadrangular cells, longitudinally and locally vertically aligned U. torta/clathratioides
6a. Thallus is almost linear, sometimes spirally twisted U. californica
6b. Blade-like thalli 7
7a. Long, narrow single thallus or multiple-branched 8
7b. Expanded blade 9
8a. Thallus short, with a thick surface across the basal and most of the thallus area, and small ruffled margins U. australis (in part)
8b. Multiple long and narrow lobes U. lactuca (in part)
9a. Blade small, rosette-like, or in a clump 10
9b. Blade expanded, foliose, having lobes 11
10a. Cells in the transection of the middle thallus are mostly round U. conglobata (in part)
10b. Cells in the transection of the middle thallus are angular 12
11a. Margins smooth 13
11b. Margins smooth to denticulate 14
12a. Cells in the transection of the middle thallus polygonal U. tanneri
12b. Cells in the transection of the middle thallus are cuboidal or columnar U. australis (in part)
13a. Cells in surface view are locally arranged in longitudinal direction 15
13b. Cells in surface view are irregularly arranged 16
14a. Margins are often heavily denticulated U. lactuca (in part)
14b. Margins are less denticulated, smooth in some parts 17
15a. Cells contain 1–3 pyrenoids U. arasakii
15b. Cells in surface view are locally arranged longitudinally, but sometimes irregularly arranged. Most cells contain 1 pyrenoid U. australis (in part)
16a. Thalli occur in intertidal habitats U. lacinulata (in part)
16b. Thalli occur in subtidal habitats U. iliohaha
17a. Cuboidal to roundish cells or sub-rectilinear cells 18
17b. Polygonal cells 19
18a. Irregularly arranged in surface view, cells in transection of the middle thallus are cuboidal U. conglobata (in part)
18b. Locally aligned patches in surface view, cells in the transection of the middle thallus predominantly have blunt and rounded teeth U. lacinulata (in part)
19a. Locally arranged longitudinally in surface view, cells in transection of the middle thallus columnar U. adhaerens
19b. Locally arranged in longitudinal or transverse rows in surface view, cells in transection of the middle thallus cuboidal U. ohnoi

Fig. 1

Sampling map of Ulva specimens across Korea, including both newly collected and herbarium samples, used in this study.

Fig. 2

Maximum likelihood tree based on the rbcL alignment. Numbers at the nodes indicate UF bootstrap values for 1,000 replicates. Outgroup taxa were pruned out of the tree. The representative Korean sequences generated in this study are highlighted in bold.

Fig. 3

Maximum likelihood tree based on the concatenated (rbcL, tufA, and ITS) alignment. Numbers at the nodes indicate UF bootstrap values for 1,000 replicates. Outgroup taxa were pruned out of the tree. The representative Korean sequences generated in this study are highlighted in bold.

Fig. 4

Summary of morphology of five tubular Ulva in Korea. The featured morphology includes the whole thallus/thalli (A, D, G, J & M), the surface view (B, E, H, K & N), and the cross-section (C, F, I, L & O) of the middle thallus. (A–C) Ulva aragoënsis. (D–F) Ulva compressa. (G–I) Ulva linza. (J–L) Ulva partita. (M–O) Ulva torta/clathratioides. Scale bars represent: A, D, J & M, 1 cm; B, F, K, L, N & O, 50 μm; C, E, H & I, 100 μm; G, 2 cm.

Fig. 5

Summary of morphology of 10 blade-like Ulva in Korea. The featured morphology includes the whole thallus/thalli (A, E, I, M, Q, U, Y, CC, GG & KK), the surface views (B, C, F, G, J, K, N, O, R, S, V, W, Z, AA, DD, EE, HH, II, LL & MM), and the cross-section (D, H, L, P, T, X, BB, FF, JJ & NN) of the middle thallus. (A–D) Ulva adhaerens. (E–H) Ulva arasakii. (I–L) Ulva australis. (M–P) Ulva californica. (Q–T) Ulva conglobata. (U–X) Ulva iliohaha. (Y–BB) Ulva lacinulata. (CC–FF) Ulva lactuca. (GG–JJ) Ulva ohnoi. (KK–NN) Ulva tanneri. Scale bars represent: A, E, U, Y & GG, 2 cm; B, 200 μm; C, D, G, K, L, N–P, R, AA, BB, DD, II, JJ & NN, 50 μm; F, H, J, Z & HH, 100 μm; I, M, Q, CC & KK, 1 cm; S, T, V-X, EE, FF, LL & MM, 20 μm.

Table 1

Current understanding of Ulva species diversity in Korea based on molecular and/or morphological evidence

Species Gross morphology Molecular evidence Morphological evidence
Ulva arasakiia Blade-like Kang et al. (2019), this study This study
Ulva aragoënsis Tubular This study This study
Ulva australisa Blade-like Kang et al. (2019), Lee et al. (2019), this study Lee et al. (2019), this study
Ulva californicaa Blade-like Kang et al. (2019), this study This study
Ulva clathrataa Tubular - -
Ulva compressaa Tubular Kang et al. (2019), this study This study
Ulva conglobataa Blade-like Lee et al. (2019), this study Lee et al. (2019), this study
Ulva flexuosaa Tubular - -
Ulva intestinalisa Tubular - -
Ulva lactucaa Blade-like Lee et al. (2019) Lee et al. (2019), this study
Ulva linzaa Tubular Kang et al. (2019), this study This study
Ulva polycladaa Tubular - -
Ulva ohnoia Blade-like Lee et al. (2019), this study Lee et al. (2019), this study
Ulva proliferaa Tubular - -
Ulva partita Tubular This study This study
Ulva reticulataa Blade-like - -
Ulva rigidaa Blade-like - -
Ulva sublittoralisa Blade-like - -
Ulva taeniataa Blade-like Kang et al. (2019) -
Ulva tanneri Blade-like This study This study
Ulva tortaa Tubular Kang et al. (2019), this study This study
Ulva lacinulataa Blade-like Lee et al. (2019), this study Lee et al. (2019), this study
Ulva iliohaha Blade-like This study This study

- indicates no available information.

a

Species in the current inventory.

Table 2

Summary of morphological features of Ulva conglobata lectotype, Ulva sp. 1, U. pseudo-ohnoi holotype, and U. pseudo-ohnoi JNU0871

U. conglobata lectotype Ulva sp. 1 U. pseudo-ohnoi JNU0871 U. pseudo-ohnoi holotype
Gross morphology Rosette-like Rosette-like Rosette-like Blade-like
Marginal denticulation Present Present Absent Present
Cell shape Polygonal Polygonal Polygonal Polygonal
Cell size 14.4–17.3 μm long, 6.3–25 μm wide 9.5–19 μm long, 5.2–12.4 μm wide 16–18 μm long, 15–21 μm wide 8–16 μm long, 6–11.6 μm wide
Thallus thickness 50–75 μm 40–80 μm 40–44 μm 50–80 (−90) μm
Chloroplast position Usually filling the whole cell Usually filling the whole cell Filling most of the cell Filling most of the cell
Number of pyrenoids At least 1–2 (this study) 1–3 n/a n/a

n/a, not applicable.

Table 3

Summary of morphology of Korean Ulva species

Species Gross morphology Cell Habitat

Surface view Cross-section Chloroplasts and numbers of pyrenoids


Cells arrangement Cell shape Length (μm) Width (μm) Thallus thickness (μm) Cell shape Length (μm) Width (μm)
U. aragoënsis Thalli attached, broad up to 4 cm or gradually broadening in the compressed part of the thallus, with small distinct holdfast; smooth and somewhat ruffled blade margins Locally arranged in longitudinal and/or in transverse rows Rectangular or angular 8–16 9–14 Monolayersa at the margin 45–48 μm thick; bilayered bladesb are 89–92 μm thick Columnar 32–35a or 35–37b 8–16 Chloroplasts fill the whole cells, containing 1–6, but mostly 1–2 pyrenoids Intertidal
U. compressa Thalli attached, yellow green or green, with a small short distinct holdfast; thalli often have bubbles within cell layers Irregularly arranged or sometimes locally arranged Mostly rectangular with rounded edges 10–23 7–12 Monolayers at the margin 35–44 μm thick; bilayered blades 80–85 μm thick Columnar 23–25 9–21 - Intertidal
U. linza Thalli attached, yellow green or green in color, filamentous or tubular; fully grown plants have small holdfast and broad thalli, up to 5 cm wide Locally arranged in longitudinal and transverse rows Polygonal, but mostly quadrangular with rounded edges 9–18a or 20–35b 5–11a or 13–28b Monolayers at the margin 40–44 μm thick Cuboidal with rounded corners 14–17 7–19 Chloroplasts fill most of the cells and contain 1–5, but mostly 1–2 pyrenoids per cell Intertidal
U. partita Thalli attached, yellow green or green in color, filamentous or tubular, 1 mm–1 cm wide; thalli occasionally branches at the base Locally arranged in longitudinal and transverse rows Polygonal with rounded edgesa or polygonal with sharper edgesb 22–45a or 8–23b 20–30a or 6–14b 22–24 Cuboidal with rounded corners 22–24 14–28 Chloroplasts fill most of the cells and contain 1–3, but mostly 1–2 pyrenoids per cell Intertidal
U. torta/clathratioides Thalli attached, filamentous, light green in color, no branch or many irregular small branches at base Longitudinal and locally vertically aligned Quadrangular or angular 6–16 5–15 23–27 Cuboidal 17–20 6–17 Chloroplasts fill the whole cells, containing 1–3, but mostly 1–2 pyrenoids Intertidal
U. adhaerens Thalli floating or attached, light to dark green in color, distromatic, with smooth to denticulate margins Locally arranged longitudinally Polygonal with rounded edges 7–17 6–17 79–92 Columnar 25–27 11–19 - Intertidal
U. arasakii Thalli attached, dark green in color, distromatic; margins smooth Locally arranged longitudinally Polygonal with rounded edges 6–14 8–13 190–195 Columnar 67–70 12–34 Chloroplast filling the whole cell with 1–3 pyrenoids Intertidal to subtidal, down to 15 m deep
U. australis High level of morphological variation; thalli yellowish green to dark green; unbranched or irregularly branched thalli; unusually thick thalli for the genus across the basal and most of thalli area; small smooth ruffle margins, approximately 0.1–0.5 cm; rosette-like with different density Locally longitudinally arranged, sometimes irregularly arranged Polygonal with rounded edges 10–17 7–13 90–94 Cuboidal to columnar 30–42 16–20 Chloroplasts occupy part of the cells, with 1–2, but mostly 1, pyrenoids Intertidal to subtidal, down to 15 m deep
U. californica Thalli attached, narrowed, yellow green or green; margins smooth Locally arranged in longitudinal and/or in transverse rows Polygonal 10–20 7–14 54–58 Rectangular with rounded edges 16–21 8–19 Chloroplasts fill the whole cells, containing 1–3 pyrenoids Intertidal
U. conglobata (U. pseudo-ohnoi) Thalli attached, light to dark green in color, distromatic with rosette-like layers; margins smooth Locally longitudinally arranged or irregularly arranged Polygonal 13–18 10–17 40–44 Mostly rounded 16–18 15–21 Chloroplasts fill most of the cells Intertidal
U. iliohaha Thalli attached, light green, distromatic, lobed, branched, and attached; margins smooth Irregularly arranged Polygonal with rounded edges 15–27 14–22 76–82 Cuboidal 35–40 21–27 - Marine environment, down to 15 m depth
U. lacinulata Thalli attached, light green to green in color, distromatic, occasionally branched; margins smooth Irregularly arranged Polygonal 8–20 7–14 53–55 Cuboidal 18–22 10–21 Chloroplasts fill the whole cell with 1–2 pyrenoids Intertidal
U. lactuca Thalli attached, green to dark green; margins denticulate Irregularly arranged Polygonal with rounded edges 11–24 8–12 64–67 Cuboidal 28–31 19–22 Cells contain 1–3 pyrenoids Intertidal
U. ohnoi Thalli floating or attached, light to dark green in color, distromatic, lobed, occasionally branched, attached or floating; margins smooth to denticulate Locally arranged in longitudinal or transverse rows Polygonal 6–21 6–13 102–108 Cuboidal 27–30 8–17 - Intertidal
U. tanneri Thalli attached, distromatic with rosette-like layers, attached; margins smooth Irregularly arranged Polygonal 14–25 9–21 49–60 Polygonal 12–15 9–17 - Intertidal

Detailed morphological descriptions are provided in the Supplementary Materials. Morphological features observed include gross morphology, cells in surface view and in cross-sections, chloroplasts position and the number of pyrenoids per cell, as well as the habitats. -, not observed.

a,b

Different morphotypes.