Fissipedicella orientalis gen. et sp. nov. (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae), a new crustose brown alga from Korea based on molecular and morphological analyses

Article information

Algae. 2023;38(3):173-181
Publication date (electronic) : 2023 September 15
doi : https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2023.38.9.9
Department of Life Science, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Korea
*Corresponding Author: E-mail: tocho@chosun.ac.kr, Tel: +82-62-230-7161, Fax: +82-62-230-7161
Received 2023 July 7; Accepted 2023 September 9.

Abstract

The crustose brown algal family Ralfsiaceae comprises four genera: Analipus, Endoplura, Heteroralfsia, and Ralfsia. This study provides a detailed description of Fissipedicella orientalis gen. et sp. nov. based on molecular and morphological analyses. Our phylogenetic analyses from rbcL and concatenated dataset (rbcL + 5′ region of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I [COI-5P]) reveal that specimens collected in Korea are nested in a distinct new clade within Ralfsiaceae with robust bootstrap support and Bayesian posterior probabilities. The sequence divergences for rbcL and COI-5P between F. orientalis and other genera within Ralfsiaceae are 7.4–10.1 and 17.5–21.2%, respectively. Fissipedicella orientalis is characterized by crustose thalli with a hypothallial basal layer and erect perithallial filaments, tufts of hairs in pits, a single chloroplast per cell, plurangia with 1–3 sterile cells, and unangia on stalks composed of 1–6 vertically or obliquely cleaved cells. We propose that F. orientalis can be recognized as a new genus-level taxon within Ralfsiaceae, even though a single species represents it. Our new genus, Fissipedicella, is distinguished from the other members within the Ralfsiaceae by the type of thallus, the number of chloroplasts and tufts of hairs in pits, and the development of unangia.

INTRODUCTION

The family Ralfsiaceae Farlow was first described by Farlow (1881). It was characterized by: (1) rounded to irregularly spreading crust developed from a discoid germination stage; (2) a basal layer of radiating appressed filaments producing simple or slightly branched and tightly appressed erect or assurgent vegetative filaments; (3) single or few chloroplasts without a pyrenoid per cell; (4) intercalary plurangial reproductive structures terminated by sterile cell(s); (5) unangia with paraphysis on the terminal part of erect filaments; (6) diplohaplontic and iso- or heteromorphic life history (Farlow 1881, Setchell and Gardner 1924, Abbott and Hollenberg 1976, Womersley 1987, Parente and Saunders 2019).

Currently, Ralfsiaceae is composed of four genera: Analipus Kjellman, Endoplura Hollenberg, Heteroralfsia Kawai, and Ralfsia Berkeley (Lim et al. 2007, Silberfeld et al. 2014, Parente and Saunders 2019, Guiry and Guiry 2023). Although the principal morphological characters used to distinguish genera within the Ralfsiaceae are known to be the type of thallus, the number of plastids per cell, the number of sterile cells on plurangia, and the development of unangia (Tanaka and Chihara 1981b, Lim et al. 2007, León-Alvarez et al. 2017, Oteng’o et al. 2021, Parente et al. 2021), it is challenging to accurately identify these crustose species based on traditional morpho-anatomical characteristics because they lack robust taxonomic features, particularly in sterile samples (Parente and Saunders 2019). Recently, molecular analyses using rbcL have been utilized to infer the phylogenetic relationships among genera within Ralfsiaceae (Lim et al. 2007, Silberfeld et al. 2014, Parente and Saunders 2019, Oteng’o and Won 2020).

Most crustose brown algae in Korea have traditionally been identified mainly as Ralfsia or Neoralfsia species based on their morphology (Lee and Kang 1986, 2001, Lee 2008, Keum 2010). However, recent research by Oteng’o et al. (2021, 2022) introduced two new Endoplura species, E. jejuensis A. O. Oteng’o, T. O. Cho & B. Y. Won and E. koreana A. O. Oteng’o, T. O. Cho & B. Y. Won and a new genus called Sungminia Oteng’o, Won & T. O. Cho within Sungminiaceae Oteng’o, Won & T. O. Cho from Korea based on morphological and molecular analyses. These findings showed the possibility that Korea may be one of the hotspots for crustose brown algal biodiversity.

We collected several unidentified samples of Ralfsia-like crusts from intertidal areas along Korean coastal shores. This study used morphological characterizations and examined their phylogenetic relationships through rbcL and 5′ region of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI-5P) gene sequences. As a result, we propose Fissipedicella orientalis gen. et sp. nov., which is assigned to the family Ralfsiaceae.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DNA extraction and amplification

From 2018 to 2020, we collected samples from intertidal areas along the coastlines of Korea (Supplementary Table S1). Genomic DNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin Plant II Kit from Macherey-Nagel (Düren, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The rbcL and COI-5P were amplified using polymerase chain reaction with HelixAmp Ready-2x-Go premix from NanoHelix Co., Ltd. (Daejeon, Korea), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The primer sets used for the amplifying rbcL and COI-5P were as specified in a previous study by Oteng’o et al. (2021).

Sequence analyses

The sequence datasets were assembled by combining previously published sequences from GenBank with 12 newly generated rbcL and 11 COI-5P sequences from this study (Supplementary Table S1). We analyzed two datasets: one consisting of 57 rbcL sequences and the other with 57 concatenated sequences (rbcL + COI-5P). We considered sequences that were unavailable in GenBank as missing data. We included sequences from Cladostephus spongiosus (Hudson) C. Agardh and Microzonia phinneyi (E. C. Henry & D. G. Müller) Camacho & Fredericq for the outgroup. The sequences were aligned using ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1994) and manually edited using Geneious Prime (v.2023.0.1; Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zeland). To determine the best partition scheme and model evolution, we used PartitionFinder 2 (Lanfear et al. 2016). For the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis, RAxMLGUI v1.5 (Silvestro and Michalak 2012) was employed with the General Time Reversible (GTR) + Γ + I model with 1,000 bootstrap replications. We conducted Bayesian inference using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001, Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). Markov chain Monte Carlo runs were carried out for 2,000,000 generations, with one cold chain and three heated chains, using the GTR + Γ + I evolutionary model. Trees were sampled every 1,000 generations. Summary trees were generated with a burn-in value of 25%. The convergence was assessed using Tracer v.1.7.2 (Rambaut et al. 2018). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the ML method in RAxML and MrBayes and visualized FigTree v.1.4.0 (Rambaut 2012). Genetic distances were calculated using the p-distance method in Mega X (Kumar et al. 2018).

Morphological analyses

To examine external morphological characteristics, samples were photographed using a waterproof digital camera (Nikon COOLPIX AW100; Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Before morphological observation, the samples were carefully detached from the substrate using a single-edged blade. We either squashed or prepared microtome sections of portions of each sample mounted on microscopy slides to observe internal morphology. The collected samples were embedded in a matrix (OCT; CellPath Ltd., Newtown, Wales, UK) to prepare microtome-sectioned samples. These embedded samples were then sectioned to a thickness of 8–10 μm using a freezing microtome (Shandon Cryotome FSE; Thermo Shandon Ltd., Loughborough, UK). The sliced and squashed samples underwent staining using a 1 : 1 combination of aqueous aniline blue and acetic acid for better visualization and analysis. The staining process enhanced the visibility of certain structures and details. The stained sections were mounted in 50% corn syrup and observed under a microscope. Photographs of samples were taken using a DP-71 camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) mounted on a BX-51TRF microscope (Olympus). To ensure clarity and improve visual presentation, the digitized images were edited using Adobe Photoshop software v.6.1 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Representative voucher specimens examined in this study were deposited in the herbarium of Chosun University (CUK) and the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), Korea.

RESULTS

Phylogenetic analyses

A total of 12 rbcL sequences (984 bp) and 11 COI-5P (654 bp) sequences were generated from newly collected samples from Korea (Supplementary Table S1). The phylogenetic tree inferred from concatenated dataset (rbcL + COI-5P) indicated that the unidentified Ralfsia-like crustose algae from Korea form a distinct and previously unknown genus, Fissipedicella orientalis gen. et sp. nov., within the family Ralfsiaceae (Fig. 1). Phylogenetic analyses based on the rbcL sequences showed overall agreement with concatenated phylogeny (Supplementary Fig. S1). Through our multi-gene sequence analyses, significant genetic differences were observed in rbcL (7.4–8.9%) and COI-5P (17.5–19.3%) sequences between Fissipedicella and Ralfsia within Ralfsiaceae (Table 1).

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree of Ralfsiales inferred from the concatenated dataset (rbcL + 5′ region of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I [COI-5P]). The value above branches = maximum likelihood bootstrap (BS) values in % ≥50, Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) ≥0.75. Values of <BS 50 or BPP 0.75 are indicated by hyphens (−). Values of BS 100 or BPP 1.00 are indicated by asterisks (*). GenBank accession numbers of each sequence data set are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Species analyzed in this study are marked in bold font. Branch lengths are proportional to substitution rate.

Gene sequence divergence value (%) of rbcL and COI-5P between genera of Ralfsiaceae using pairwise distance

Morphological observations

Fissipedicella A. O. Oteng’o, B. Y. Won & T. O. Cho gen. nov

Description

Thalli are crustose with circular to irregular outlines, firmly attached to the substratum, and lacking rhizoids. They comprise two main parts: the hypothallial basal layer and the perithallial erect filament. The hypothallial basal layer is formed by one to several prostrate filaments, which are made up of elongated cells that give rise to perithallial erect filaments. The perithallial erect filaments exhibit branching, straight, or upward curvature, gradually tapering towards the surface, and are firmly adjoined. The chloroplast is parietal and one per cell. Tufts of hair in pits frequently arise from the lower to middle portions of the perithallial erect filaments. The plurangial reproductive structure is intercalary, composed of 1–2 reproductive filaments, and terminated by 1–3 sterile cells. Unangia originate from perithallial erect cells that branch to produce the paraphysis and stalk. The stalk serves as a supportive structure for the terminal unangium. The stalks are composed of vertically or obliquely cleaved cells.

Type species

Fissipedicella orientalis.

Etymology

The name “Fissipedicella” refers to unangial pedicels (stalks) formed by vertical cell division.

Korean name

갯바위딱지속.

Fissipedicella orientalis A. O. Oteng’o, B. Y. Won & T. O. Cho sp. nov. (Fig. 2)

Fig. 2

Morphology of Fissipedicella orientalis sp. nov. (A) Thalli on the rock forming epilithic greenish-brown crusts. (B) Thalli with circular confluent crusts. (C & D) Longitudinal section of vegetative young thallus (C) and mature thallus (D) composed of erect perithallial filaments (EF) and hypothallial basal layer (BL). (E) Erect perithallial filaments showing a single chloroplast (arrows) per cell chloroplasts. (F) Tufts with hairs (Ha) in pits developed from perithallial erect filaments. (G) Longitudinal section view of reproductive thallus showing protrusion of plurangial sorus. (H) Longitudinal section showing reproductive thallus with plurangia (Pl), vegetative filaments (VF), and hypothallial basal layer (BL). (I) Plurangial reproductive structure composed of plurangial filaments (PF) and terminal sterile cells (SC). (J) Longitudinal section of reproductive thallus showing protrusion of unangial sorus. (K) Longitudinal section of reproductive thallus showing unangia (arrow) among paraphyses (Pa). (L) Unangia (Un) on stalks (St) with vertical divisions (arrows) and paraphyses (Pa). Scale bars represent: A, 0.5 cm; B, 0.2 cm; C, D & K, 50 μm; E, 10 μm; F, H, I & L, 25 μm; G & J, 100 μm.

Description

Thalli are epilithic crusts, exhibiting a range of colors from greenish or reddish-brown to dark brown, which become very dark brown when dry. They have a circular to irregular outline and are often mere together, with no distinct lighter margins (Fig. 2A & B). Thalli are 0.2–4.5 (−7.5) cm across, 85–421 μm thick, firmly attached to the substratum, with inconspicuous growth lines and mostly smooth surface, with rust-red undersurface, and lacking rhizoids (Fig. 2A & B).

The hypothallial basal layer comprises one to several cell layers in which cells are 4–12 μm wide and have a width-to-length ratio of 1 : 1.8–3.8, giving rise to erect perithallial filaments (Fig. 2C & D). The erect perithallial filaments are branched, straight, or upwardly curved, tapering towards the surface, and firmly adjoined with one another to form pseudoparenchymatous tissue (Fig. 2D). Cells of the erect perithallial filaments are 4–25 μm long and 4–16 μm wide. The chloroplast is parietal and one per cell (Fig. 2E). Tufts of hair in pits arise from the basal to mid parts of erect perithallial filaments (Fig. 2F). Reproductive portions of the plurangial and unangial sori form slightly elevated areas on the same or different thalli (Fig. 2G & J). Plurangial reproductive structures are intercalary, 43–202 μm long, composed of 1–2 reproductive filaments, and terminated by 1–3 sterile cells (Fig. 2H & I). Unangial reproductive thalli give rise to produce two types of filaments, both originating from erect perithallial cells. These filaments branch out to form paraphyses, and there are also shorter biseriate stalk cells that support terminal unangia (Fig. 2K & L). Unangia are obovoid to ellipsoid to oblong, 47–116 μm long, and 7–40 μm wide, and terminally produced on 1–6 celled stalks that are vertically or obliquely cleaved (Fig. 2L). The paraphyses are clavate, 92–148 μm long, 2–12 μm wide, and composed of 5–10 cells (Fig. 2L).

Holotype

CUK18754, Mar 3, 2018, coll. by B. Y. Won and T. O. Cho deposited in the CUK herbarium, Korea.

Type locality

Pado-ri, Sowon-myeon, Taean-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea (36°43′05.65″ N, 126°07′ 33.79″ E).

Isotypes

NIBROR0000004864 (CUK18765) at the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), Korea.

Etymology

The specific epithet, orientalis, refers to the Orient (Far East Asia) region where the alga grows naturally.

Korean name

갯바위딱지.

DNA sequences of type specimens

For the holotype, OK031043 (rbcL) and OK031055 (COI-5P).

Paratypes

CUK18821, CUK18822, CUK18825 (Apr 1, 2018, Jeongdo-ri, Wando-eup, Wando-gun, Jeollanam-do, Korea); CUK19178A (Oct 8, 2018, Gijang, Ilgwang-myeon, Gijang-gun, Busan, Korea); CUK19219B (Nov 3, 2018, Pado-ri, Sowon-myeon, Taean-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea); CUK19509C, CUK19510C, CUK19512B, CUK19519 (Apr 19, 2019, Seongsan Ilchul Peak, Seongsan-eup, Seogwipo-si, Jeju Island, Korea); CUK19606C (May 1, 2019, Seongsan Ilchul Peak, Seongsan-eup, Seogwipo-si, Jeju Island, Korea); CUK19696, CUK19699, CUK19703, CUK19706, CUK19707B, CUK19709, CUK19710 (Jun 6, 2019, Yeraehaean-ro, Seogwipo-si, Jeju Island, Korea); CUK20040D, CUK20041D (Oct 26, 2019, Bomok Port, Bomok-dong, Seogwipo-si, Jeju Island, Korea); CUK20066A (Oct 28, 2019, Hwasam-ri, Yongnam-myeon, Tongyeong-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea); CUK20331, CUK20332 (May 8, 2020, Jeongdo-ri, Wando-eup, Wando-gun, Jeollanam-do, Korea); CUK20753A, CUK20754, CUK20755, CUK20759E, CUK20760A (Aug 17, 2020, Seongsan Ilchul Peak, Seongsan-eup, Seogwipo-si, Jeju Island, Korea); CUK20771, CUK20772 (Oct 17, 2020, Dolsan Port, Dolsan-eup, Yeosu-si, Jeollanam-do, Korea).

Reproductive phenology

Plants with both plurangial and unangial reproductive structures have been collected during March to June and also in November.

Distribution and habitat

This species has been observed in various localities along the western coast (Taean), southern coast (Busan, Tongyeong, and Wando), and Jeju Island, Korea. It is found on hard substrates, including pebbles and rocks in the intertidal zone.

DISCUSSION

Based on morphological and molecular analyses, we propose a new genus and species, Fissipedicella orientalis gen. et sp. nov. The sequences of both rbcL and concatenated dataset (rbcL + COI-5P) from specimens collected in Korea were nested in a distinct clade within Ralfsiaceae and were distinguished from the other members within the Ralfsiaceae. Fissipedicella orientalis has a sister relationship with Endoplura and an unidentified clade (incertae sedis) (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. S1). Although Endoplura shows a sister relationship with our F. orientalis in the phylogeny based on both rbcL and concatenated dataset (rbcL + COI-5P), it is distinguished from F. orientalis by having several chloroplasts per cell and sessile unangia (Hollenberg 1969, Tanaka and Chihara 1981b, Lim et al. 2007, Oteng’o et al. 2021). Ralfsia within the Ralfsiaceae also distinguished from F. orientalis by having unangia either sessile or on stalks of 1–2 horizontally cleaved cells and plurangia terminated mostly by a sterile cell (Hollenberg 1969, Tanaka and Chihara 1980, Womersley 1987, Parente and Saunders 2019). Analipus and Heteroralfsia are distinguished by having erect sporophyte and unangium sessile (Kjellman 1889, Nelson 1980, Kawai 1989, Lim et al. 2007). Fissipedicella is characterized by combinations of these characteristics listed in Table 2 and distinguished from other members (Analipus, Endoplura, Heteroralfsia, and Ralfsia) within the Ralfsiaceae.

Comparison of the morphological characters among genera within Ralfsiaceae

Key to genera within Ralfsiaceae

  • 1. Plants with heteromorphic thalli, crustose portion bearing plurangia, and erect sporophytic thalli bearing unangia ........................................................... Heteroralfsia

  • 1. Plants with isomorphic thalli, either crustose or erect thalli bearing both plurangia and unangia ...................... 2

  • 2. Thalli erect ..................................................... Analipus

  • 2. Thalli crustose ............................................................ 3

  • 3. Chloroplasts per cell several, plurangial reproductive filaments 2–5 ...................................................... Endoplura

  • 3. Chloroplast per cell single, plurangial reproductive filaments 1–2 ........................................................................... 4

  • 4. Tufts of hair in pits present, stalk composed of 1–6 vertically or obliquely cleaved cells ..... Fissipedicella

  • 4. Tufts of hairs in pits absent, stalk composed of 1–2 horizontally cleaved cells ................................ Ralfsia

In the classification of crustose brown algae, the detailed morphology of unangia has been used as a character of various taxonomic ranks within the Ralfsiales (Tanaka and Chihara 1981b, León-Alvarez and González-González 2003, Lim et al. 2007, León-Alvarez et al. 2017, Parente et al. 2021). Due to the variation in detailed morphologies of unangia, such as stalk-like filaments, paraphyses, and position of unangia, these reproductive structures may hold taxonomic significance within different groups at various levels within the Ralfsiales. There are two main types of unangia: those with paraphyses and those without. Unangia with paraphyses has been observed in the Neoralfsiaceae Lim & Kawai in Lim, Sakaguchi, Hanyuda, Kogame, Phang & Kawai, Pseudoralfsiaceae Patente, Fletcher & G. W. Saunders, Sungminiaceae, and Ralfsiaceae (Hollenberg 1969, Lim et al. 2007, Parente et al. 2021, Oteng’o et al. 2022). Fissipedicella orientalis produces unangia from stalks with paraphyses, similar to some species of Ralfsia (Ralfsia confusa Hollenberg, R. hesperia Setchell & N. L. Gardner, R. huanghaiensis Li & Li, R. integra Hollenberg, and R. pedicellata J. Tanaka & Chihara) within Ralfsiaceae (Hollenberg 1969, Tanaka and Chihara 1981a, Xiyi and Junfeng 1993). However, F. orientalis differs in that it has biseriate stalks formed through vertical or oblique divisions, whereas Ralfsia species have uniseriate stalks formed only through transverse divisions. The development of stalk by the vertical division has not been reported in any other genera within the Ralfsiaceae.

Applying molecular analyses to crustose brown algae has significantly broadened our comprehension of the phylogenetic relationships among related families within Ralfsiales, leading to valuable insights into their taxonomic positions. In our molecular analyses, Fissipedicella orientalis is more closely related to incertae sedis (“Ralfsia longicellularis” and Endopluralean sp. 1GWS) than other genera within Ralfsiaceae. “Ralfsia longicellularis” was originally described from Peter the Great Bay, Far East Russia by Perestenko (1980) and was subsequently reported to Korea based on molecular and morphological evidence by Oteng’o and Won (2020). “Ralfsia longicellularis” is clearly distinguished as a different species from other species of Ralfsia in our phylogenetic trees. Endopluraean sp. 1GWS has been reported as a closely related taxon with Endoplura based on molecular data by Parente and Saunders (2019). The sequence divergences for rbcL and COI-5P between Fissipedicella orientalis and the incertae sedis (“Ralfsia longicellularis” and Endopluralean sp. 1GWS) were 6.7–6.8 and 17.8%, respectively (Table 1). The sequence divergence values between genera within Ralfsiaceae have been shown to be ≥5.5 and ≥17.5% for rbcL and COI-5P, respectively (Table 1). In the future, if more information becomes available about the clade of incertae sedis, it may be recognized as a distinct taxonomic group within Ralfsiaceae. Additionally, none of unpublished and non-identified sequences in GenBank included in these analyses have been related to our new genus, Fissipedicella orientalis gen. et sp. nov.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by a research fund from Chosun University (2022) to T. O. Cho.

Notes

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary Table S1. Taxa included in the phylogenetic analyses, with voucher / strain, collection locality and / or date, GenBank accession numbers for rbcL and COI-5P, and references (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2023-38-3-173-Supplementary-Table-S1.pdf

Supplementary Fig. S1. Phylogenetic tree of Ralfsiales based on the sequences of rbcL gene (https://www.e-algae.org).

algae-2023-38-3-173-Supplementary-Fig-S1.pdf

References

Abbott I. A., Hollenberg G. J.. 1976. Marine algae of California Stanford University Press. Stanford, CA: p. 827.
Farlow W. G.. 1881. Marine algae of New England and adjacent coast US Government Printing Office. Washington: p. 210.
Guiry M. D., Guiry G. M.. 2023. AlgaeBase World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland; Galway: Available from: http://www.algaebase.org . Accessed Jun 20, 2023.
Hollenberg G. J.. 1969;An account of the Ralfsiaceae (Phaeophyta) of California. J. Phycol 5:290–301.
Huelsenbeck J. P., Ronquist F.. 2001;MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755.
Kawai H.. 1989;Life history and systematic position of Heteroralfsia saxicola gen. et comb. nov. (Ralfsiaceae, Phaeophyceae). Phycologia 28:243–251.
Keum Y. S.. 2010. Sphacelariales, Cutleriales, Ralfsiales. In : Shin S., ed. Algal Flora of Korea. Vol. 2, No 2 Heterokontophyta: Phaeophyceae: Ishigeales, Dictyotales, Desmarestiales, Sphacelariales, Cutleriales, Ralfisales, Laminariales National Institute of Biological Resources. Incheon: p. 73–108.
Kjellman F. R.. 1889;Om Beringhafvets algflora [About the Bering Sea algae]. Kongl. Sv. Vet. Acad. Handl. Stockholm 23:1–58.
Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C., Tamura K.. 2018;MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol 35:1547–1549.
Lanfear R., Frandsen P. B., Wright A. M., Senfeld T., Calcott B.. 2016;PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol 34:772–773.
Lee I. K., Kang J. W.. 1986;A check list of marine algae in Korea. Korean J. Phycol 1:311–325.
Lee Y.. 2008. Marine algae of Jeju Academy Publication. Seoul: p. 477.
Lee Y. P., Kang S. Y.. 2001. A catalogue of the seaweeds in Korea Jeju National University Press. Jeju: p. 662.
León-Alvarez D., González-González J.. 2003;The morphological distinction of Ralfsia expansa and R. hancockii (Ralfsiaceae, Rhaeophyta) from Mexico. Phycologia 42:613–621.
León-Alvarez D., Reyes-Gómez V. P., Wynne M. J., Ponce-Márquez M. E., Quiróz-González N.. 2017;Morphological and molecular characterization of Hapalospongidion gelatinosum, Hapalospongidiaceae fam. nov. (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae) from Mexico. Bot. Mar 60:567–581.
Lim P.-E., Sakaguchi M., Hanyuda T., Kogame K., Phang S.-M., Kawai H.. 2007;Molecular phylogeny of crustose brown algae (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae) inferred from rbcL sequences resulting in the proposal for Neoralfsiaceae fam. nov. Phycologia 46:456–466.
Nelson W. A.. 1980. Analipus japonicus (Harv.) Wynne (Phaeophyta): studies of its biology and taxonomy. Ph.D. dissertation University of British Columbia. Vancouver, Canada: p. 244.
Oteng’o A. O., Cho T. O., Won B. Y.. 2021; Endoplura jejuensis sp. nov. and E. koreana sp. nov. (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae) from Korea based on molecular and morphological analyses. Algae 36:155–163.
Oteng’o A. O., Won B. Y.. 2020; Ralfsia longicellularis (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae): a Far East Asian endemic brown alga from Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol 38:101–105.
Oteng’o A. O., Won B. Y., Cho T. O.. 2022;Proposal for the Sungminiaceae fam. nov. (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae) for Sungminia gen. nov. with three new species based on molecular and morphological analyses. J. Phycol 58:719–728.
Parente M. I., Fletcher R. L., Costa F. O., Saunders G. W.. 2021;Taxonomic investigation of Ralfsia-like (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae) taxa in the North Atlantic Ocean based on molecular and morphological data, with descriptions of Pseudoralfsiaceae fam. nov., Pseudoralfsia azorica gen. et sp. nov. and Nuchella vesicularis gen. et sp. nov. Eur. J. Phycol 56:12–23.
Parente M. I., Saunders G. W.. 2019;A molecular survey of Ralfsia sensu stricto (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae) in Canada uncovers three new species: R. robertii sp. nov., R. tenebris sp. nov., and R. unimaculata sp. nov. Botany 97:135–147.
Perestenko L.. 1980. Vodorosli Zaliva Petra Velikogo [The seaweeds of Peter the Great Bay] NAUKA Leningradskoe Otdelenie. Leningrad: p. 231.
Rambaut A.. 2012. FigTree, tree figure drawing tool v1.4.0 Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh; Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/ . Accessed Feb 2, 2021.
Rambaut A., Drummond A. J., Xie D., Baele G., Suchard M. A.. 2018;Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetic using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol 67:901–904.
Ronquist F., Huelsenbeck J. P.. 2003;MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574.
Setchell W. A., Gardner N. L.. 1924. Phycological contributions, VII Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 13p. 1–13.
Silberfeld T., Rousseau F., de Reviers B.. 2014;An updated classification of brown algae (Ochrophyta, Phaeophyceae). Cryptogam. Algol 35:117–156.
Silvestro D., Michalak I.. 2012;raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RaxML. Org. Divers. Evol 12:335–337.
Tanaka J., Chihara M.. 1980;Taxonomic study of the Japanese crustose brown algae (2). Ralfsia (Ralfsiaceae, Ralfsiales) (Part 1). J. Jpn. Bot 55:337–342.
Tanaka J., Chihara M.. 1981a;Taxonomic study of the Japanese crustose brown algae (4) Ralfsia (Ralfsiaceae, Ralfsiales) (Part 3). J. Jpn. Bot 56:97–104.
Tanaka J., Chihara M.. 1981b;Taxonomic study of Japanese crustose brown algae (5). Endoplura and Diplura (Ralfsiaceae, Ralfsiales). J. Jpn. Bot 56:153–160.
Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J.. 1994;CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties, and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680.
Womersley H. B. S.. 1987. The marine benthic flora of southern Australia Part II South Australian Government Printing Division. Adelaide: p. 484.
Xiyi L., Junfeng L.. 1993; Ralfsia huanghaiensis, a new species of Ralfsia (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyta). Ocenol. Limnol. Sin 24:172–176.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree of Ralfsiales inferred from the concatenated dataset (rbcL + 5′ region of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I [COI-5P]). The value above branches = maximum likelihood bootstrap (BS) values in % ≥50, Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) ≥0.75. Values of <BS 50 or BPP 0.75 are indicated by hyphens (−). Values of BS 100 or BPP 1.00 are indicated by asterisks (*). GenBank accession numbers of each sequence data set are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Species analyzed in this study are marked in bold font. Branch lengths are proportional to substitution rate.

Fig. 2

Morphology of Fissipedicella orientalis sp. nov. (A) Thalli on the rock forming epilithic greenish-brown crusts. (B) Thalli with circular confluent crusts. (C & D) Longitudinal section of vegetative young thallus (C) and mature thallus (D) composed of erect perithallial filaments (EF) and hypothallial basal layer (BL). (E) Erect perithallial filaments showing a single chloroplast (arrows) per cell chloroplasts. (F) Tufts with hairs (Ha) in pits developed from perithallial erect filaments. (G) Longitudinal section view of reproductive thallus showing protrusion of plurangial sorus. (H) Longitudinal section showing reproductive thallus with plurangia (Pl), vegetative filaments (VF), and hypothallial basal layer (BL). (I) Plurangial reproductive structure composed of plurangial filaments (PF) and terminal sterile cells (SC). (J) Longitudinal section of reproductive thallus showing protrusion of unangial sorus. (K) Longitudinal section of reproductive thallus showing unangia (arrow) among paraphyses (Pa). (L) Unangia (Un) on stalks (St) with vertical divisions (arrows) and paraphyses (Pa). Scale bars represent: A, 0.5 cm; B, 0.2 cm; C, D & K, 50 μm; E, 10 μm; F, H, I & L, 25 μm; G & J, 100 μm.

Table 1

Gene sequence divergence value (%) of rbcL and COI-5P between genera of Ralfsiaceae using pairwise distance

Features 1 2 3 4 5 6
1. Fissipedicella gen. nov. - 19.5 20.6–21.2 - 17.5–19.3 17.8
2. Analipus 7.9 - 19.3–21.4 - 18.0–19.9 19.3
3. Endoplura 9.3–10.1 9.0–9.5 - - 20.4–23.1 18.2–19.5
4. Heteroralfsia 9.4 7.7 10.7–11.1 - - -
5. Ralfsia 7.4–8.9 5.5–6.7 9.3–10.5 7.8–9.3 - 16.5–20.1
6. Incertae sedis 6.7–6.8 7.7–7.9 8.1–9.3 8.1–8.5 6.9–8.1 -

Numbers below and above the diagonal are rbcL and 5′ region of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI-5P), respectively.

Table 2

Comparison of the morphological characters among genera within Ralfsiaceae

Features Fissipedicella gen. nov. Analipus Endoplura Heteroralfsia Ralfsia
Life history Isomorphic Isomorphic Isomorphic Heteromorphic Isomorphic or direct
Thallus type of sporophyte Crustose Erect Crustose Erect Crustose
Symmetry / asymmetry of thallus Straight or unilateral Unilateral Straight or unilateral Unilateral Unilateral or bilateral
Unistratose / multistratose thalli Unistratose - Unistratose - Unistratose or multistratose
No. of chloroplasts per cell Single Single to many Several Single Single
Tufts of hairs in pits Present Present Present or absent Present Absent
Development of unangia Stalk of 1–6 vertically or obliquely cleaved cells Sessile Sessile or on soral filaments Sessile Sessile or stalk of 1–2 horizontally cleaved cells
No. of plurangial reproductive filaments 1–2 1–2 2–5 1 1–2
No. of sterile cells in plurangial reproductive filament 1–3 1–3 2–8 1 1 (to 6)
Reference This study Kjellman (1889), Nelson (1980), Lim et al. (2007) Hollenberg (1969), Tanaka and Chihara (1981b, Lim et al. (2007), Oteng’o et al. (2021) Kawai (1989), Lim et al. (2007) Hollenberg (1969), Tanaka and Chihara (1980), Womersley (1987), Parente and Saunders (2019)