Phylogeographic patterns in cryptic Bostrychia tenella species (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) across the Thai-Malay Peninsula

Article information

Algae. 2022;37(2):123-133
Publication date (electronic) : 2022 June 15
doi :
1Department of Fishery Biology, Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
2School of Biological Science, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
*Corresponding Author: E-mail:, Tel: +66-2-942-8701, Fax: +66-2-942-8702
Received 2022 February 1; Accepted 2022 June 4.


Genetic diversity and distribution patterns of marine macroalgae are increasingly being documented in Southeast Asia. These studies show that there can be significant levels of genetic diversity and isolation between populations on either side of the Thai-Malay Peninsula. Bostrychia tenellla is a common filamentous red seaweed in the region and the entity is represented by at least two cryptic species. Despite being highly diverse and widespread, genetic variation and population structure of this species complex remains understudied, especially around the Thai-Malay Peninsula. We analyzed genetic diversity and inferred the phylogeographic pattern of specimens identified as B. tenella using the plastid RuBisCo spacer from samples from the Andaman Sea and the Gulf of Thailand. Our genetic analysis confirmed the occurrence of the two cryptic B. tenella species (B and C) along both coasts. Cryptic species B was more common in the area and displayed higher genetic diversity than species C. Historical demographic analyses indicated a stable population for species B, but more recent population expansion for species C. Our analyses also revealed that both cryptic species from the Andaman Sea possessed higher genetic diversity than those of the Gulf of Thailand. We also detected moderate to high levels of gene flow and weak phylogeographic structure of cryptic species B between the two coasts. In contrast, phylogeographic analysis showed genetic differences between populations of both cryptic species within the Andaman Sea. Overall, these results suggest that cryptic B. tenella species around Thai-Malay Peninsula may have undergone different demography histories, and their patterns of genetic diversity and phylogeography were likely caused by geological history and regional sea surface current circulation in the area.


Genetic studies are increasingly exploring the patterns of diversity, evolutionary history, and phylogeography for many marine species (Bowen et al. 2016, Faria et al. 2021). Phylogeographic analyses are often used to trace the process of marine species dispersal and population connectivity (e.g., Zuccarello and Martin 2016, Vieira et al. 2021), but can also detect cryptic species diversity and biogeographic breaks in the ocean (Fraser et al. 2013, Muangmai et al. 2015a). Such analyses are crucial to provide a useful framework for marine natural bioresource management and invasive species risk assessment (Teske et al. 2011, Bowen et al. 2016).

In the Southeast Asia region, genetic diversity and phylogeographic patterns of macroalgae are being increasingly documented. Many previous studies indicated different levels of genetic diversity among macroalgal species. For example, the brown alga Sargassum polycystum C. Agardh showed low genetic diversity, but higher diversity on the Andaman coast of Thailand (Kantachumpoo et al. 2014), whereas, in the Philippines, high genetic diversity was detected in the red algae, Phycocalidia acanthophora (E. C. Oliveira & Coll) Santiañez (Dumilag and Aguinaldo 2017, as Pyropia acanthophora) and Gracilaria salicornia (C. Agardh) E. Y. Dawson (Ferrer et al. 2019). Phylogeographic studies also indicated partial isolation between the Indian and Pacific Ocean populations of S. polycystum (Kantachumpoo et al. 2014). This separation appears to be maintained by a geographic barrier (the Thai-Malay Peninsula) and the current oceanographic discontinuity between the Indian and Pacific oceans (Kantachumpoo et al. 2014, Wichachucherd et al. 2014).

Cryptic species are common in red algae (e.g., Zuccarello et al. 2002, Muangmai et al. 2014, Díaz-Tapia et al. 2018) and are known to differ in many species-specific properties, although being morphologically identical. Their demographic histories can differ (Muangmai et al. 2015a, 2022) and they can differ physiologically (Muangmai et al. 2015b) and chemically (Payo et al. 2011, Bracegirdle et al. 2019). In addition, they can differ in their intertidal position (Muangmai et al. 2016). In the Indo-Pacific, genetic studies revealed cryptic diversity in many red seaweeds (e.g., Payo et al. 2013, Gabriel et al. 2016, Saengkaew et al. 2016). Recognizing this cryptic algal diversity highlights a substantial undiscovered biodiversity, with implication for a need to continue a thorough investigation of red algae using data based on extensive markers and sampling.

Bostrychia tenella (J. V. Lamouroux) J. Agardh is a marine filamentous red alga, which is distributed in tropical and subtropical regions (King and Puttock 1989, Zuccarello et al. 2015). This species naturally grows either on mangroves or in the high intertidal on rocks. Zuccarello et al. (2015) were able to resurrect the species B. binderi Harvey from B. tenella using DNA-based species delimitation, but also showed cryptic species diversity within B. tenella, consisting of two species B and C with overlapping distributions. In Thailand, B. tenella is relatively common and widespread across the coastal areas based on morphological record (Lewmanomont et al. 1995). Recent genetic analysis indicated the occurrence of B. tenella species B and C on both eastern (the Gulf of Thailand – Pacific Ocean) and western coasts (Andaman Sea – Indian Ocean) of Thailand (Saengkaew et al. 2016). Additionally, coexistence of two cryptic species was reported from both coastal regions of the country (Saengkaew et al. 2016). However, due to the limited sampling this study mainly focused on the phylogenetic diversity of B. tenella, and therefore genetic diversity and distribution pattern of this cryptic species across the Thai-Malay Peninsula have not been fully examined.

In this present study, we used the chloroplast-encoded RuBisCo spacer of B. tenellla across the Thai-Malay Peninsula to assess its genetic diversity and phylogeographic pattern. We also wanted to see if there were genetic differences of these cryptic species between the Andaman coasts and the Gulf of Thailand, and then determined what factors could explain these distribution patterns.


Algal sampling

We surveyed B. tenella populations around rocky intertidal areas of 12 sites along the Thai-Malay Peninsula: the Gulf of Thailand (T1–T6) and the Andaman Sea (A1–A6) (Table 1, Fig. 1), between 2017 and 2019. At each site, algal samples were randomly collected, at least 10 samples per population, and preserved in silica gel for both morphological and molecular analyses. For morphological observation, preserved samples were prepared by soaking in water for 5 min and subsequently simultaneously stained and preserved in 1% aniline blue acidified with 1% HCl and mounted in 50% glucose syrup (Karo Corn Syrup) on microscope slides. Species identification was based on previous publications (King and Puttock 1989, Zuccarello et al. 2015).

Collection localities and genetic diversity parameters of cryptic Bostrychia tenella species in Thailand

Fig. 1

Distribution of Bostrychia tenella species B and C based on RuBisCo spacer haplotypes across the Thai-Malay Peninsula. Pie charts on the map indicate the relative proportions of haplotypes at each population (Table 1), with the total number of samples (n) per population given next to each pie chart. Green line indicates possible phylogeographic break zone within the Andaman Sea. (Inset) Map of Southeast Asia showing Thailand shaded in black and Malacca Strait shaded in red.

DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction, and sequencing

Genomic DNA isolation was performed using apical portions of dried algal specimens, with a modified Chelex extraction method (Zuccarello et al. 1999) or Norgen Biotek’s Plant/Fungi DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek Corp., Thorold, Canada). The plastid-encoded RuBisCo spacer was selected for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. This fragment is a powerful region for exploring inter- and intra-species diversity in Bostrychia (Zuccarello and West 2003, Zuccarello et al. 2015). PCR was carried out using PCR Master mix Solution (i-Taq, iNtRON Biotechnology DR, Seongnam, Korea), in a total volume of 20 μL, consisting of 10 μL of i-Taq, 10 pmol of each primer and 2 μL of genomic DNA (~10–20 ng). PCR amplification profile and procedure followed Zuccarello and West (2003). All amplified products were cleaned using ExoSAP-IT (USB, Cleveland, OH, USA) and then sequenced commercially in both directions using PCR primers (U2Bio Inc., Seoul, Korea).

Alignment, phylogenetic reconstructions, historical demography, and population structure analysis

Sequences were edited, assembled, and aligned using the Geneious Prime software package (Biomatters, available from Alignments of the RuBisCo spacer sequences were performed using the MAFFT algorithm (Katoh et al. 2002) and were further manually refined. Additional 12 sequences of B. tenella were obtained from GenBank and included in the alignment (Supplementary Table S1).

Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using maximum-likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods using IQ-TREE (Minh et al. 2020) and MrBayes v3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012), respectively. ML analyses were carried out with the HKY + G model as selected by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) and 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The molecular evolution models for BI were selected using Kakusan 4 (Tanabe 2011). BI analyses were performed using a GTR + I + R model, with two parallel runs of four Markov chains for a million generations. We sampled one tree every 1,000 generations and then removed 2,500 trees (burn-in) before determining a consensus tree and posterior probabilities. Both ML and BI trees were edited with the program FigTree v1.4.4 (Rambaut 2016).

Number of haplotypes (H), haplotype (Hd), and nucleotide (π) diversity were calculated for each population using DnaSP v6 (Rozas et al. 2017). Haplotype networks were produced using median joining generated in PopART v1.7 (University of Otago, available from Additionally, the historical demography for each species (species B vs. species C) and population (Andaman Sea vs. the Gulf of Thailand) levels was estimated by the analyses of mismatch distribution and neutrality tests, Tajima’s D (Tajima 1989) and Fu’s FS, as implemented in DnaSP. The analysis of mismatch distribution uncovers the demographic history of populations, with population expansions producing a unimodal distribution, whereas stable population show a multimodal distribution (Rogers and Harpending 1992).

Population differentiation was analyzed separately for each cryptic species for populations with at least 10 samples. The analysis was examined using two different approaches. First, pairwise population differentiation (FST) values were estimated with a significance level of 0.05 determined by 10,000 permutations. Secondly, Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) was performed with significance determined by 1,023 permutations. All analyses were conducted in Arlequin v (Excoffier and Lischer 2010).


Genetic diversity and distribution

The RuBisCo spacer with partial 3′-rbcL and 5′-rbcS gene sequences of 275–286 bp were successfully generated from 152 samples of 12 populations of B. tenella from both coasts of Thailand. Genetic distance among these sequences ranged from 0.0 to 6.6%. ML and BI analyses yielded almost complete topological congruence, and the ML tree is presented in Supplementary Fig. S1. Phylogenetic analyses demonstrated the occurrence of two different cryptic species of B. tenella: B and C, based on Zuccarello et al. (2015), in Thailand. Among 152 samples, 113 samples were species B, while 39 samples belonged to species C. Intraspecific genetic variation varied from 0.0–3.4% for species B and ranged from 0.0–1.3% for species C.

Haplotype and genetic diversity indices of the two cryptic species are presented in Table 1. Within species, both cryptic B. tenella species revealed a moderate genetic diversity (Hd = 0.670 for species B and Hd = 0.629 for species C), but higher nucleotide diversity for species B (π = 0.00807) than for species C (π = 0.00272) (Table 1). Within populations haplotype diversity (Hd) ranged from 0.00 to 0.68 for species B and from 0.00 to 0.62 for species C (Table 1). Nucleotide diversity (π) was relatively low, varying from 0.0000 to 0.0037 for species B, and from 0.0000 to 0.0023 for species C (Table 1).

Both cryptic B. tenella species were found on both coastal areas of Thailand. Cryptic species B was widely distributed in Thailand, recorded in 9 out of 12 sampled populations, while species C was detected in 7 populations (Fig. 1). Additionally, both cryptic species were found to coexist at three of the 12 sites (A2 and A4 in the Andaman Sea and T4 from the Gulf of Thailand) (Fig. 1).

Haplotype diversity and networks

Median-joining haplotype networks of cryptic species B and C constructed using RuBisCo spacer sequence (including haplotypes from Zuccarello et al. 2015 and Saengkaew et al. 2016) are presented in Fig. 2. Cryptic species B consisted of eight haplotypes in Thailand (B1, B8–B14) of which the B9–B14 are reported here for the first time. The haplotype network of species B was star-like with a central common haplotype B1 (80% of samples), found in nine of 12 populations sampled in the present study (Table 1, Fig. 1) and in addition at three sampled sites (Phuket, Chumphon and Nakhon Si Thammarat) of Saengkeaw et al. (2016) and in Sabah, Malaysia (Zuccarello et al. 2015). Five novel B-haplotypes were only found in Andaman populations (A2, A5, and A6), while haplotype B12 was restricted to the Gulf of Thailand (populations T5 and T6) (Table 1, Fig. 1).

Fig. 2

Haplotype networks for cryptic Bostrychia tenella species B and C from RuBisCo spacer sequences. Colors represent the populations in the Andaman Sea (purple) and in the Gulf of Thailand (orange). Pie chart size represents the frequency of each haplotype. Solid circles correspond to haplotypes found in this study, whereas dashed and white colored circles correspond to haplotypes from Zuccarello et al. (2015). Small lines represent inferred missing haplotypes.

Cryptic species C is represented by three haplotypes in Thailand (C1, C2, and C7) (Fig. 2). Haplotype C2 was relatively common, accounting for 51% of all samples, and it occurred in all five populations where this species was found. C2 is the only haplotype of cryptic species C which was shared on both coasts of Thailand, while the other haplotypes were confined to the Andaman Sea (Table 1, Fig. 1). Haplotype C1 was shared in nearly all population of this species in the Andaman Sea, while haplotype C7 was detected from populations A1 and A3 (Table 1, Fig. 1).

Demographic history and population differentiation

The mismatch distribution showed a multimodal pairwise distance distribution of species B, but unimodal distribution of species C, indicating that species C has undergone a recent expansion (Supplementary Fig. S2). These demographic patterns were further supported by significant positive values of Tajima’s D test for species B (0.08932, p < 0.05), suggesting a stable population, but significant negative value for species C (−1.11856, p < 0.05), indicating a population expansion. However, the estimates of Fu’s FS were not significant (1.12591, p > 0.1 for species B, and 1.02017, p > 0.1 for species C).

Analyses within biogeographic regions were only done for B. tenella species B. Species B from the Andaman Sea displayed a multimodal distribution (Supplementary Fig. S2) and significant positive value of Fu’s FS test (1.78007, p < 0.05), whereas species B from the Gulf of Thailand showed a unimodal distribution (Supplementary Fig. S2) plus negative values of Fu’s FS test (−0.54417, p > 0.1), implying that the Gulf populations has more likely undergone recent expansion than the Andaman Sea populations. Values of Tajima’s D test were not significant (1.74664, p > 0.1 for Andaman Sea population and 1.34228, p > 0.1 for the Gulf population).

Genetic differentiation (FST values) was moderate to low between populations of B. tenella species B from the Andaman Sea (A2, A5, and A6) and the Gulf of Thailand (T1–T6), with pairwise FST values ranging between 0.14 and 0.69 (p < 0.05) (Supplementary Table S2). Significant moderate to low genetic differentiation was detected within Andaman Sea populations, with FST value in the range of 0.67 of 0.28 (A2, A5, and A6). While low genetic differentiation was discovered from the Gulf of Thailand population, with FST value in the range of 0.08 to 0.40 (Supplementary Table S2). No genetic differentiation (FST = 0.00) was found among the upper Gulf populations (T1–T4), while a slight genetic differentiation (FST = 0.08) was observed between the lower Gulf populations (T5 and T6) (Supplementary Table S2).

Pairwise FST values indicated that Andaman Sea populations of cryptic species C differed significantly. Population A1 was genetically distinct from the other two populations, with FST values ranging between 0.40 to 0.51. Low genetic differentiation was observed between populations A3 and A4 (FST = 0.03) (Supplementary Table S3).

The AMOVA was calculated to determine genetic differentiation of cryptic species B between the Andaman Sea (A2, A5, and A6) and the Gulf of Thailand (T1–T6) populations. AMOVA results indicated that the proportion of variation attributed to among populations within regions was 47.70% and within-population differences for 32.43%, whereas 19.87% occurred among regions (Supplementary Table S4). The F statistics revealed the significant and high genetic differences within populations (FST = 0.67), but low among regions (FCT = 0.19) (Supplementary Table S4).


With wide-range sampling along the coasts of Thailand and chloroplast DNA analysis, we reconfirmed the occurrence of two distinct lineages, B and C, of B. tenella on both coastal regions of the country. In addition, we detected differences between these two cryptic species. Bostrychia tenella species B showed higher abundance and genetic diversity than species C. Different levels of genetic diversity between cryptic species was also observed in other red seaweeds, e.g., Bostrychia intricata (Bory) Montagne (Muangmai et al. 2015a, 2022), Sarcopeltis skottsbergii (Setchell & N. L. Gardner) Hommersand, Hughey, Leister & P. W. Gabrielson (Billard et al. 2015, as Gigartina skottsbergii), and Asparagopsis taxiformis (Delile) Trevisan (Zanolla et al. 2018). These previous studies suggested that these different levels of genetic variation among cryptic species was likely due to different evolutionary and demographic histories. Our additional analyses of mismatch distribution and Tajima’s D test further supported the different patterns of historic population demography in these two cryptic species of B. tenella. We, therefore, postulate that cryptic B. tenella species B and C in this area have different patterns of historical population demography. However, the evolutionary history of cryptic B. tenella species needs further investigation with larger sample sizes and more variable markers (e.g., microsatellites).

We also observed different levels of genetic diversity in cryptic B. tenella species between the Andaman Sea and the Gulf of Thailand. Our data showed that genetic diversity of Andaman Sea populations of B. tenella was higher than that of the populations in the Gulf of Thailand. Additionally, we identified several novel haplotypes of cryptic species B from the Andaman Sea, whereas only one new haplotype was found in the Gulf of Thailand. This is consistent with previous findings that the Andaman Sea harbored greater diversity, both genetic and at the species levels than the Gulf of Thailand for seaweed (e.g., Kantachumpoo et al. 2014, Wichachucherd et al. 2014, Pongparadon et al. 2015) and other marine species, for example littoral earthworms (Seesamut et al. 2019), dugongs (Poommouang et al. 2021) and clams (Suppapan et al. 2021). Differences in genetic diversity across the Thai-Malay Peninsula could be driven by historical environmental changes and different geographical features. The lowering of sea levels (~120 m below present-day sea level) during the Last Glacial Period (ca. 17,000 years ago) resulted in the formation of landmass in Southeast Asia known as Sundaland (Sathiamurthy and Voris 2006). The emergent Sundaland would have eliminated the habitat availability of marine taxa through the Gulf of Thailand and constrained populations to the east (South China Sea) and west (the Andaman Sea) coasts of the landmass (Cannon et al. 2009, Ludt and Rocha 2015). By the end of the last glaciation (ca. 11,000 years ago), recolonization of the Gulf of Thailand would have led to a potential founder event for these populations (Palmer 2004, Guo et al. 2020). Accordingly, this would result in higher genetic diversity in Andaman Sea populations, and lower diversity in the Gulf population. Such a hypothesis has been applied to mangrove species in Southeast Asia (see Wee et al. 2014, Guo et al. 2020), and therefore could also apply to B. tenella and other seaweed around the Thai-Malay Peninsula.

Although previous studies have revealed strong phylogeographic patterns between the Gulf of Thailand and Andaman Sea in some marine species (e.g., Nguyen et al. 2014, Wichachucherd et al. 2014, Seesamut et al. 2019, Panithanarak 2020), we did not find a clear phylogeographic signal in the B. tenella species complex across the Thai-Malay Peninsula. Our results showed that pairwise FST value between the Andaman Sea and the Gulf populations of cryptic species B demonstrated the presences of low to moderate levels of genetic differentiation, with only 19.87% of detected genetic differences found between the Andaman Sea and the Gulf of Thailand (AMOVA results), indicating moderate to high connectivity in cryptic species B. Our findings suggest the occurrence of gene flow around the Thai-Malay Peninsula. Furthermore, our demographic history analyses indicated that the Gulf populations of cryptic species B historically experienced a more recent expansion than Andaman Sea populations. Accordingly, we assume that the connectivity of B. tenella species B population across Thai-Malay Peninsula could possibly be associated with the historical subsidence of Sundaland, leading to a recent population expansion of this alga during the inundation of the Gulf of Thailand, and regional circulation patterns linking these two coastal areas (Haditiar et al. 2020).

In the Andaman Sea, we detected some genetic differences between B. tenella species. Cryptic species B population from Ranong province (A2) differed significantly from Trang and Satun provinces (A5 and A6). Additionally, analysis of haplotype distribution indicated that haplotype B1 found in population A4 was also found in A5 and A6, but not in A2, implying the genetic break occurring north to Phuket provinces (A4) (Fig. 1). Similarly, pairwise FST showed moderate genetic differentiation of cryptic species C populations between Ranong province (A1) and Phang Nga and Phuket provinces (A3 and A4). These results indicate that there is low gene flow between these populations of both cryptic species. Potential factors contributing to the genetic differentiation could be attributed to the ocean circulation patterns from North Indian Ocean and the Malacca Strait (Wyrtki 1961, Chatterjee et al. 2017). The North Indian Ocean current always flows southwesterly toward the Andaman Sea, while the Malacca Strait current directs north-westward toward the Andaman Sea. These two currents flowed offshore and partly mix during both the North–East (December through February) and the South–West (June through September) monsoon season (Rizal et al. 2012). This current pattern may act as a marine barrier to gene flow, which promotes isolation between Andaman Sea populations. Such potential barrier was speculated to contribute to restricted distribution of some Halimeda species (Pongparadon et al. 2015) and genetic divergence of sandfish (Ninwichian and Klinbunga 2020) and mangrove (Guo et al. 2020).

Our results also showed the coexistence of cryptic B. tenella species B and C in populations of the Andaman Sea and the Gulf of Thailand. Coexistence of different cryptic species is likely to be common in the genus Bostrychia (Zuccarello and West 2003, 2011, Muangmai et al. 2014, 2022). How different cryptic Bostrychia species can coexist could possibly be explained by their eco-physiological differences, including difference in tidal height distribution, wave exposure and salinity tolerance (Muangmai et al. 2015b, 2016). In order to obtain detailed insight into the forces maintaining the coexistence in cryptic B. tenella species, their ecological interactions and physiological aspects need further investigation.

In conclusion, our data clearly indicated the contrasting patterns of genetic diversity between two cryptic B. tenella species B and C in Thai waters, suggesting different demographic history between these two cryptic species. However, both cryptic species from Andaman Sea possessed higher level of genetic diversity than the Gulf of Thailand populations. These findings have implications for not only evaluating the potential genetic resources of these cryptic red algae, but even contributing to accurate marine biodiversity assessment for strategic conservation planning of coastal areas. We also detected weak phylogeographic structure of B. tenella species B between the two coasts, but a relatively strong phylogeographic patterning of B. tenella species C along the Andaman Sea coast. These patterns could have been shaped by a combination of historical geological events (submergence of Sundaland) and contemporary regional circulation. However, in order to better understand the phylogeographic structure and demographic history of cryptic B. tenella species distributed around the Thai-Malay Peninsula, additional sampling sites from the Malacca Strait and the South China Sea, plus applying more variable genetic markers are necessary.


Supplementary Table S1. RuBisCo spacer sequence of Bostrychia samples used in this study (

Supplementary Table S2. Pairwise FST values for the 12 populations of Bostrychia tenella species B along the coast of Thailand (

Supplementary Table S3. Pairwise FST values for the 12 populations of Bostrychia tenella species C along the Andaman coasts of Thailand (

Supplementary Table S4. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) results of Bostrychia tenella species B (

Supplementary Fig. S1. The maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogeny (lnL = −2,325.1355) of Bostrychia tenella inferred from plastid RuBisCo spacer sequences showing the two cryptic species (B and C, from Zuccarello et al. 2015) (

Supplementary Fig. S2. Mismatch distributions of the cryptic B. tenella species B (A) and species C (B). Mismatch distributions of species B from the Andaman Sea (C) and from the Gulf of Thailand (D) (



This study is funded by Kasetsart University through the Graduate School Fellowship Program (JB and NM), and Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University (NM). We also appreciate Jantana Praiboon and Chatcharee Kaewsuralikhit for assistance with algal sample collection.


The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.


Billard E, Reyes J, Mansilla A, Faugeron S, Guillemin M-L. 2015;Deep genetic divergence between austral populations of the red alga Gigartina skottsbergii reveals a cryptic species endemic to the Antarctic continent. Polar Biol 38:2021–2034.
Bowen BW, Gaither MR, DiBattista JD, Iacchei M, Andrews KR, Grant WS, Toonen RJ, Briggs JC. 2016;Comparative phylogeography of the ocean planet. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:7962–7969.
Bracegirdle J, Sohail Z, Fairhurst MJ, Gerth ML, Zuccarello GC, Hashmi MA, Keyzers RA. 2019;Costatone C: a new halogenated monoterpene from the New Zealand red alga Plocamium angustum. Mar. Drugs 17:418.
Cannon CH, Morley RJ, Bush ABG. 2009;The current refugial rainforests of Sundaland are unrepresentative of their biogeographic past and highly vulnerable to disturbance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:11188–11193.
Chatterjee A, Shankar D, McCreary JP, Vinayachandran PN, Mukherjee A. 2017;Dynamics of Andaman Sea circulation and its role in connecting the equatorial Indian Ocean to the Bay of Bengal. J Geophys Res Oceans 122:3200–3218.
Díaz-Tapia P, Maggs CA, Macaya EC, Verbruggen H. 2018;Widely distributed red algae often represent hidden introductions, complexes of cryptic species or species with strong phylogeographic structure. J Phycol 54:829–839.
Dumilag RV, Aguinaldo Z-ZA. 2017;Genetic differentiation and distribution of Pyropia acanthophora (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) in the Philippines. Eur J Phycol 52:104–115.
Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. 2010;Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567.
Faria R, Johannesson K, Stankowski S. 2021;Speciation in marine environments: diving under the surface. J Evol Biol 34:4–15.
Ferrer MSR, Gomez RN, Nacido CB, Moises MT, Dumilag RV. 2019;Genetic diversity of Philippine Gracilaria salicornia (Gracilariaceae, Rhodophyta) based on mitochondrial COI-5P sequences. Biologia 74:599–607.
Fraser CI, Zuccarello GC, Spencer HG, Salvatore LC, Carcia GR, Waters JM. 2013;Genetic affinities between trans-oceanic populations of non-buoyant macroalgae in the high latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere. PLoS ONE 8:e69138.
Gabriel D, Draisma SGA, Sauvage T, Schmidt WE, Schils T, Lim P, Harris DJ, Fredericq S. 2016;Multilocus phylogeny reveals Gibsmithia hawaiiensis (Dumontiaceae, Rhodophyta) to be a species complex from the Indo-Pacific, with the proposal of G. eilatensis sp. nov. Phytotaxa 227:1–20.
Guo W, Banerjee AK, Ng WL, Yuan Y, Li W, Huang Y. 2020;Chloroplast DNA phylogeography of the Holly mangrove Acanthus ilicifolius in the Indo-West Pacific. Hydrobiologia 847:3591–3608.
Haditiar Y, Putri MR, Ismail N, Muchlisin ZA, Ikhwan M, Rizal S. 2020;Numerical study of tides in the Malacca Strait with a 3-D model. Heliyon 6:e04828.
Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. 2017;ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 14:587–589.
Kantachumpoo A, Uwai S, Noiraksar T, Komatsu T. 2014;Levels and distribution patterns of mitochondrial cox3 gene variation in brown seaweed, Sargassum polycystum C. Agardh (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) from Southeast Asia. J Appl Phycol 26:1301–1308.
Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002;MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066.
King RJ, Puttock CF. 1989;Morphology and taxonomy of Bostrychia and Stictosiphonia (Rhodomelaceae/Rhodophyta). Aust Syst Bot 2:1–73.
Lewmanomont K, Wongrat L, Supanwanid C. 1995. Algae in Thailand Integrated Promotion Technology Co., Ltd. Bangkok: p. 334.
Ludt WB, Rocha LA. 2015;Shifting seas: the impacts of Pleistocene sea-level fluctuations on the evolution of tropical marine taxa. J Biogeogr 42:25–38.
Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, von Haeseler A, Lanfear R. 2020;IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 37:1530–1534.
Muangmai N, Fraser CI, Zuccarello GC. 2015a;Contrasting patterns of population structure and demographic history in cryptic species of Bostrychia intricata (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) from New Zealand. J Phycol 51:574–585.
Muangmai N, Preuss M, West JA, Zuccarello GC. 2022;Cryptic diversity and phylogeographic patterns of the Bostrychia intricata species complex (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) along the coast of southeastern Australia. Phycologia 61:27–36.
Muangmai N, Preuss M, Zuccarello GC. 2015b;Comparative physiological studies on the growth of cryptic species of Bostrychia intricata (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) in various salinity and temperature conditions. Phycol Res 63:300–306.
Muangmai N, von Ammon U, Zuccarello GC. 2016;Cryptic species in sympatry: nonrandom small-scale distribution patterns in Bostrychia intricata (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta). Phycologia 55:424–430.
Muangmai N, West JA, Zuccarello GC. 2014;Evolution of four Southern Hemisphere Bostrychia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) species: phylogeny, species delimitation and divergence times. Phycologia 53:593–601.
Nguyen VX, Detcharoen M, Tuntiprapas P, Soe-Htun U, Sidik JB, Harah MZ, Prathep A, Papenbrock J. 2014;Genetic species identification and population structure of Halophila (Hydrocharitaceae) from the Western Pacific to the Eastern Indian Ocean. BMC Evol Biol 14:92.
Ninwichian P, Klinbunga S. 2020;Population genetics of sandfish (Holothuria scabra) in the Andaman Sea, Thailand inferred from 12S rDNA and microsatellite polymorphism. Reg Stud Mar Sci 35:101189.
Palmer DR. 2004. Phylogeography and population genetic structure of the dugongs in Thailand. MS thesis San Jose State University; San Jose, CA: 61.
Panithanarak T. 2020;Phylogeography of three commercially important seahorses (genus Hippocampus) in Thai waters: an implication from collective sequence data. J Fish Environ 44:1–15.
Payo DA, Colo J, Calumpong H, De Clerck O. 2011;Variability of non-polar secondary metabolites in the red alga Portieria . Mar Drugs 9:2438–2468.
Payo DA, Leliaert F, Verbruggen H, D’hondt S, Calumpong HP, De Clerck O. 2013;Extensive cryptic species diversity and fine-scale endemism in the marine red alga Portieria in the Philippines. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:20122660.
Pongparadon S, Zuccarello GC, Phang S-M, Kawai H, Hanyuda T, Prathep A. 2015;Diversity of Halimeda (Chlorophyta) from the Thai–Malay Peninsula. Phycologia 54:349–366.
Poommouang A, Kriangwanich W, Buddhachat K, Brown JL, Piboon P, Chomdej S, Kampuansai J, Mekchay S, Kaewmong P, Kittiwattanawong K, Nganvongpanit K. 2021;Genetic diversity in a unique population of dugong (Dugong dugon) along the sea coasts of Thailand. Sci Rep 11:11624.
Rambaut A. 2016;FigTree v1.4.3 Available from: . Accessed Mar 27, 2021.
Rizal S, Damm P, Wahid MA, Sundermann J, Ilhamsyah Y, Iskandar T, Muhammad . 2012;General circulation in the Malacca Strait and Andaman Sea: a numerical model study. Am J Environ Sci 8:479–488.
Rogers AR, Harpending H. 1992;Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol Biol Evol 9:552–569.
Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck J. 2012;MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542.
Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sánchez-Gracia A. 2017;DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol Biol Evol 34:3299–3302.
Saengkaew J, Muangmai N, Zuccarello GC. 2016;Cryptic diversity of the mangrove-associated alga Bostrychia (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) from Thailand. Bot Mar 59:363–371.
Sathiamurthy E, Voris HK. 2006;Maps of Holocene Sea level transgression and submerged lakes on the Sunda Shelf. Nat Hist J Chulalongkorn Univ Suppl 2:1–44.
Seesamut T, Jirapatrasilp P, Sutcharit C, Tongkerd P, Panha S. 2019;Mitochondrial genetic population structure and variation of the littoral earthworm Pontodrilus longissimus Seesamut and Panha, 2018 along the coast of Thailand. Eur J Soil Biol 93:103091.
Suppapan J, Sangthong P, Songrak A, Supmee V. 2021;Population genetic structure of hard clam (Meretrix lyrata) along the Southern coast of Thailand. Biodiversitas 22:2489–2496.
Tajima F. 1989;Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–595.
Tanabe AS. 2011;Kakusan4 and Aminosan: two programs for comparing nonpartitioned, proportional and separate models for combined molecular phylogenetic analyses of multilocus sequence data. Mol Ecol Resour 11:914–921.
Teske PR, von der Heyden S, McQuaid CD, Barker N. 2011;A review of marine phylogeography in southern Africa. S Afr J Sci 107:43–53.
Vieira C, Steen F, D’hondt S, Bafort Q, Tyberghein L, Fernandez-García C, Wysor B, Tronholm A, Mattio L, Payri C, Kawai H, Saunders G, Leliaert F, Verbruggen H, De Clerck O. 2021;Global biogeography and diversification of a group of brown seaweeds (Phaeophyceae) driven by clade-specific evolutionary processes. J Biogeogr 48:703–715.
Wee AKS, Takayama K, Asakawa T, Thompson B, Sungkaew S, Tung NX, Nazre M, Soe KK, Tan HTW, Watano Y, Baba S, Kajita T, Webb EL. 2014;Oceanic currents, not land masses, maintain the genetic structure of the mangrove Rhizophora mucronata Lam. (Rhizophoraceae) in Southeast Asia. J Biogeogr 41:954–964.
Wichachucherd B, Prathep A, Zuccarello GC. 2014;Phylogeography of Padina boryana (Dictyotales, Phaeophyceae) around the Thai-Malay Peninsula. Eur J Phycol 49:313–323.
Wyrtki K. 1961. Physical oceanography of the Southeast Asian waters Scripps Institution of Oceanography, The University of California. La Jolla, CA: p. 195.
Zanolla M, Altamirano M, Carmona R, De la Rosa J, Souza-Egipsy V, Sherwood A, Tsiamis K, Barbosa AM, Muñoz AR, Andreakis N. 2018;Assessing global range expansion in a cryptic species complex: insights from the red seaweed genus Asparagopsis (Florideophyceae). J Phycol 54:12–24.
Zuccarello GC, Martin P. 2016;Phylogeography of the Lessonia variegata species complex (Phaeophyceae, Laminariales) in New Zealand. Algae 31:91–103.
Zuccarello GC, Muangmai N, Preuss M, Sanchez LB, Loiseaux de Goër S, West JA. 2015;The Bostrychia tenella species complex: morphospecies and genetic cryptic species with resurrection of B. binderi . Phycologia 54:261–270.
Zuccarello GC, Sandercock B, West JA. 2002;Diversity within red algal species: variation in world-wide samples of Spyridia filamentosa (Ceramiaceae) and Murrayella periclados (Rhodomelaceae) using DNA markers and breeding studies. Eur J Phycol 37:403–417.
Zuccarello GC, West JA. 2003;Multiple cryptic species: molecular diversity and reproductive isolation in the Bostrychia radicans/B. moritziana complex (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta) with focus on North American isolates. J Phycol 39:948–959.
Zuccarello GC, West JA. 2011;Insights into evolution and speciation in the red alga Bostrychia: 15 years of research. Algae 26:21–32.
Zuccarello GC, West JA, Kamiya M, King RJ. 1999;A rapid method to score plastid haplotypes in red seaweeds and its use in determining parental inheritance of plastids in the red alga Bostrychia (Ceramiales). Hydrobiologia 401:207–214.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Distribution of Bostrychia tenella species B and C based on RuBisCo spacer haplotypes across the Thai-Malay Peninsula. Pie charts on the map indicate the relative proportions of haplotypes at each population (Table 1), with the total number of samples (n) per population given next to each pie chart. Green line indicates possible phylogeographic break zone within the Andaman Sea. (Inset) Map of Southeast Asia showing Thailand shaded in black and Malacca Strait shaded in red.

Fig. 2

Haplotype networks for cryptic Bostrychia tenella species B and C from RuBisCo spacer sequences. Colors represent the populations in the Andaman Sea (purple) and in the Gulf of Thailand (orange). Pie chart size represents the frequency of each haplotype. Solid circles correspond to haplotypes found in this study, whereas dashed and white colored circles correspond to haplotypes from Zuccarello et al. (2015). Small lines represent inferred missing haplotypes.

Table 1

Collection localities and genetic diversity parameters of cryptic Bostrychia tenella species in Thailand

Population code Locality (collection date) Coordinates No. of individuals examined (n) Haplotype present No. of haplotypes [H (n)] Haplotype diversity (Hd ± SD) Nucleotide diversity (π ± SD)
Andaman Sea
 A1 Chandamri Beach, Ranong (Mar 2017) 9°57′57.2″ N, 98°35′34.5″ E 12 C = 3 C1 (8), C2 (1), C7 (3) C = 0.53 ± 0.13 C = 0.00236 ± 0.0001
 A2 Prapas Beach, Ranong (Mar 2017) 9°21′45.8″ N, 98°23′41.9″ E 18 B = 3 B8 (3), B13 (4), B14 (10) B = 0.603 ± 0.09 B = 0.00369 ± 0.0001
C = 1 C2 (1) C = 0.00 C = 0.00
 A3 Ao Khoei, Phang Nga (Mar 2017) 9°17′19.8″ N, 98°22′21.7″ E 12 C = 3 C1 (3), C2 (7), C7 (2) C = 0.621 ± 0.11 C = 0.00293 ± 0.0006
 A4 Saphan Hin Beach, Phuket (Apr 2018) 7°52′06.8″ N, 98°23′58.3″ E 15 B = 1 B1 (4) B = 0.00 B = 0.00
C = 2 C1 (3), C2 (8) C = 0.436 ± 0.13 C = 0.00153 ± 0.0004
 A5 Ratchamongkol Beach, Trang (Mar 2018) 7°31′15.8″ N, 99°18′19.8″ E 12 B = 3 B1 (3), B10 (6), B11 (3) B = 0.682 ± 0.09 B = 0.00286 ± 0.0005
 A6 Pak Bara, Satun (Mar 2018) 6°51′41.4″ N, 99°43′11.1″ E 15 B = 3 B1 (9), B9 (3), B10 (3) B = 0.600 ± 0.10 B = 0.00360 ± 0.00001
 Total 84 B = 7 B1 (16), B8 (3), B9 (3), B10 (9), B11 (3), B13 (4), B14 (10) B = 0.829 ± 0.02 B = 0.01369 ± 0.0003
C = 3 C1 (14), C2 (17), C7 (5) C = 0.629 ± 0.04 C = 0.00272 ± 0.0001
Gulf of Thailand
 T1 Laem Sok, Trat (May 2019) 12°02′47.3″ N, 102°35′10.3″ E 11 B = 1 B1 (11) B = 0.00 B = 0.00
 T2 Kung Krabaen Bay, Chanthaburi (May 2019) 12°31′24.5″ N, 101°56′56.4″ E 10 B = 1 B1 (10) B = 0.00 B = 0.00
 T3 Samaesan, Chonburi (Mar 2018) 12°36′09.9″ N, 100°57′08.9″ E 15 B = 1 B1 (15) B = 0.00 B = 0.00
 T4 Thungwualaen Beach, Chumphon (Apr 2019) 10°33′15.4″ N, 99°16′38.1″ E 12 B = 1 B1 (9) B = 0.00 B = 0.00
C = 1 C2 (3) C = 0.00 C = 0.00
 T5 Samui Island, Surat Thani (Apr 2019) 9°25′32.4″ N, 99°56′05.0″ E 10 B = 2 B1 (7), B12 (3) B = 0.533 ± 0.09 B = 0.00374 ± 0.00001
 T6 Khanom, Nakhon Si Thammarat (Apr 2019) 9°08′15.1″ N, 99°52′38.7″ E 10 B = 2 B1 (6), B12 (4) B = 0.467 ± 0.13 B = 0.00327 ± 0.00001
 Total 68 B = 2 B1 (58), B12 (7) B = 0.195 ± 0.06 B = 0.00137 ± 0.00042
C = 1 C2 (3) C = 0.00 C = 0.00
 Overall 152 B = 8 B1 (16), B8 (3), B9 (3), B10 (9), B11 (3), B12 (7), B13 (4), B14 (10) B = 0.670 ± 0.05 B = 0.00807 ± 0.00021
C = 3 C1 (14), C2 (20), C7 (5) C = 0.629 ± 0.04 C = 0.00127 ± 0.00016

SD, standard deviation.