Easy and rapid quantification of lipid contents of marine dinoflagellates using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method

Article information

Algae. 2016;31(4):391-401
Publication date (electronic) : 2016 December 15
doi : https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2016.31.12.7
1Environment and Resource Convergence Center, Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon 16229, Korea
2School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*Corresponding Author: E-mail: bada0@snu.ac.kr, Tel: +82-31-888-9042, Fax: +82-31-888-9040
Received 2016 October 03; Accepted 2016 December 07.

Abstract

To develop an easy and rapid method of quantifying lipid contents of marine dinoflagellates, we quantified lipid contents of common dinoflagellate species using a colorimetric method based on the sulpho-phospho-vanillin reaction. In this method, the optical density measured using a spectrophotometer was significantly positively correlated with the known lipid content of a standard oil (Canola oil). When using this method, the lipid content of each of the dinoflagellates Alexandrium minutum, Prorocentrum micans, P. minimum, and Lingulodinium polyedrum was also significantly positively correlated with the optical density and equivalent intensity of color. Thus, when comparing the color intensity or the optical density of a sample of a microalgal species with known color intensities or optical density, the lipid content of the target species could be rapidly quantified. Furthermore, the results of the sensitivity tests showed that only 1–3 × 105 cells of P. minimum and A. minutum, 104 cells of P. micans, and 103 cells of L. polyedrum (approximately 1–5 mL of dense cultures) were needed to determine the lipid content per cell. When the lipid content per cell of 9 dinoflagellates, a diatom, and a chlorophyte was analyzed using this method, the lipid content per cell of these microalgae, with the exception of the diatom, were significantly positively correlated with cell size, however, volume specific lipid content per cell was negatively correlated with cell size. Thus, this sulpho-phospho-vanillin method is an easy and rapid method of quantifying the lipid content of autotrophic, mixotrophic, and heterotrophic dinoflagellate species.

INTRODUCTION

Knowing the lipid content of marine microalgae is important for understanding their metabolism and for the use of their biomass as biofuel. Among them, dinoflagellates contain large amounts of high-quality lipids and dinosterols (Piretti et al. 1997, Mansour et al. 1999).

Dinoflagellates play diverse roles in the marine food web as primary producers, prey, predators, symbionts, and parasites (Muscatine 1990, Coats 1999, Jeong et al. 2010, 2012, Lee et al. 2014a, 2014b). In the last two decades, many phototrophic dinoflagellates that were previously thought to be exclusively autotrophic have been shown to be mixotrophic (Jacobson and Anderson 1996, Stoecker 1999, Jeong et al. 2005, 2010, Lee et al. 2014c). Therefore, these protists not only perform photosynthesis, but also feed on prey as energy sources. Furthermore, many dinoflagellates are important prey for mixotrophic and heterotrophic protists and metazoans (e.g., Jeong et al. 2010). Thus, they are a major source of fatty acids, sterols, and other nutrients to these predators. Also, they often dominate the plankton assemblages and sometimes form red tides or harmful algal blooms in the waters of many countries (Hallegraeff 1993, Anderson 1997, Park et al. 2013). Approximately 75% of the harmful algal bloom species are dinoflagellates (Smayda 1997). As a result of their very high concentrations during explosive and extensive blooms, they have been studied as a potential candidate for a source of biofuel (de la Jara et al. 2003, Fuentes-Grünewald et al. 2012, 2016). Thus, it is very important to analyze the lipid content of many dinoflagellates within relatively short time by using reasonable lipid quantification methods.

To analyze the lipid content of a dinoflagellate species, clonal cultures of target species should be established first and then a large amount of the culture should be harvested to obtain a large quantity of its biomass. This process usually takes a long time and is also very laborious. Chloroform and methanol based lipid extraction methods have been widely used for lipid quantification (Folch et al. 1957, Bligh and Dyer 1959). However, the conventional Folch or Bligh and Dyer’s method in which lipids are extracted using chloroform and methanol requires a large amount of biomass and thus, usually requires a great deal of time and labor. The process of drying, extraction, weighing, and transesterification of samples for gas chromatography analysis may also take several days and can be laborious work. Thus, development of easier and rapider methods of quantifying the lipid content of microalgae is required.

The sulpho-phospho-vanillin (SPV) method has been used for the determination of the total lipid content in human cerebrospinal fluid (Drevon and Schmit 1964, Vatassery et al. 1981), as well as in serum, food, and ecological samples. The SPV assay produces a distinct pink color when reacting with lipids, and the intensity of the color can be quantified by measuring the absorbance at 530 nm using spectrophotometric methods. The advantages of this technique are that it is able to measure lipid content rapidly and simply and requires only a small amount of target sample. Thus, this method has been employed for rapid quantification of the intracellular lipid contents of some microalgae (Hao et al. 2013, Mishra et al. 2014, Byreddy et al. 2016).

In this study, we applied a modified SPV method for quantifying the lipid content of dinoflagellate species. Furthermore, using this method, we analyzed the lipid content of 9 dinoflagellate species including phototrophic, mixotrophic and heterotrophic species (Amphidinium carterae, Heterocapsa triquetra, Prorocentrum minimum, Alexandrium minutum, Oxyrrhis marina, Scrippsiella trochoidea, Ostreopsis cf. ovata, Prorocentrum micans, and Lingulodinium polyedrum), 1 chlorophyta (Dunaliella tertiolecta), and 1 diatom (Thalassiosira sp., 30 μm). Moreover, the relationships between lipid content and cell sizes or volumes of the dinoflagellates were explored.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents and standard curve preparation

Concentrated sulfuric acid, o-phosphoric acid (85%), chloroform, and methanol, all American Chemical Society (ACS) grade, were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA) and Junsei Chemical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Vanillin (≥98%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The phospho-vanillin reagent was prepared by dissolving 0.75 g vanillin in 0.125 L distilled water and mixed with 500 mL of 85% phosphoric acid solution. The final concentration of reagent was 1.2 mg vanillin per mL of 68% phosphoric acid (Inouye and Lotufo 2006). For standard lipid stock, commercial Canola oil was obtained from the local market.

For preparation of the standard curve, commercial Canola oil was dissolved in chloroform (10 mg in 10 mL for a final concentration of 1 mg mL−1), and different concentrations (10–150 μg) of standard lipid samples were prepared in clean glass vials. The vials were incubated at 90°C for 10 min to evaporate the chloroform. Concentrated sulfuric acid (0.1 mL) was added to each vial, and then heated at 90°C for 10–20 min. After cooling on ice about 5 min, 2.4 mL of phospho-vanillin reagent was added and allowed to develop for 10 min, until the color of the sample turned pink. Absorbance was measured at 530 nm using a spectrophotometer (Jenway-7300; Bibby Scientific, Stone, UK).

Color reaction of four dinoflagellate species in different cell numbers

To observe the color reaction of dinoflagellate lipids at different cell concentrations, we analyzed lipid contents of four dinoflagellate species: Prorocentrum minimum, Alexandrium minutum, P. micans, and Lingulodinium polyedrum.

Each species was grown at 20°C in enriched f/2 seawater media (Guillard and Ryther 1962) under a continuous illumination of 20 μE m−2 s−1 provided by cool white fluorescent lights. Cultures were grown for 5–7 days, until the cell number was high enough for analysis (over 1.5 × 107 cells), at which point, the cells were collected. Four dinoflagellate species were prepared depending on cell concentration from 1,000 to 2,000,000 cells mL−1 (103, 104, 105, 3 × 105, 5 × 105, 7 × 105, 106, and 2 × 106). Triplicated samples of each cell number were prepared for lipid analysis. Pellets of each cell number were collected into a 15-mL glass vial, and then freeze dried for analysis.

After analyzing lipid content using the SPV method, the lipid content data analyzed for each cell number was calculated using the standard curve, and the lipid content of individual cells was calculated. A t-test and ANOVA were performed to determine if the lipid content of individual cells has any significant difference with the lipid content of the individual cells calculated for each different cell number.

Preparation of 11 experimental organisms

We prepared nine dinoflagellates species including a benthic dinoflagellate (Ostreopsis cf. ovata) and a heterotrophic dinoflagellate (Oxyrrhis marina), and a chlorophyte, and a diatom species for comparison (Table 1). All cultures were grown at 20°C in enriched f/2-Si seawater media (Guillard and Ryther 1962) under a continuous illumination of 20 μE m−2 s−1 provided by cool white fluorescent lights except O. marina and diatom (f/2 media).

List of the experimental organisms and their cell size (ESD, μm), trophic modes, and origins

The phototrophic and mixotrophic species were grown in 2-L PC bottles containing 1 L of f/2-Si or f/2 media per a bottle. The cultures of each species were grown over a week until they ended exponential growth and entered stationary phase. The cell concentrations of these cultures were more than 3,000 cells mL−1. Aliquots of 10 mL were taken from each bottle and then fixed with Lugol’s solution in order to count their cell concentrations. Additionally, triplicate 50-mL aliquots were prepared for lipid content analysis using the SPV method.

O. marina was grown on dried yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Red Star; Lesaffre Yeast Corporation, St. Milwaukee, WI, USA) at 20°C. Yeast (0.1 g L−1) was supplied to the predator cells every day for 5 days, but not on the last day, in order to eliminate all yeast from the O. marina culture medium. After yeast removal, the samples were prepared for lipid quantification in the same manner as the other species.

The mean equivalent spherical diameter (ESD) was measured by an electronic particle counter (Coulter Multisizer II; Coulter Corporation, Miami, FL, USA).

Micro-colorimetric method using the SPV reaction

The direct measurement of lipid content using the SPV reaction in this study was modified from the Inouye and Lotufo protocol (Inouye and Lotufo 2006); in this method, 0.2 mL sample, 0.1 mL sulfuric acid, and 2.4 mL vanillin reagent (1.2 mg vanillin per milliliter of 68% phosphoric acid) were used.

For analysis of the lipid content of the 11 experimental species, triplicates of 50 mL samples were harvested using centrifugation at 3,500 rpm for 10 min. Pellets were rinsed with distilled water 2–3 times, and transferred into 15-mL glass centrifuge tubes. The pellets were freeze dried, and then 2 mL of a chloroform : methanol mixture (2 : 1 [v:v]) was added into the tubes, vortexing for 1 min for extraction. Subsequently, 1.5 mL of a 0.9% NaCl solution was added and the samples were centrifuged at 3,500 rpm for 15 s. The supernatant (methanol + 0.9% NaCl solution) was carefully removed, and 0.2–1 mL of the remaining materials (chloroform + extract) was transferred into a 4-mL glass vial. The vial was placed on the hot plate set at 90°C to allow the solvent to evaporate. Once the solvent was removed, 0.1 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid was added to each vial, and then heated at 90°C for 10 min until the color of sample changed to light brown. The vial was then removed from the hot plate and allowed to cool on ice for 5 min. Phospho-vanillin reagent (2.4 mL) was added and allowed to develop for 10 min, until the color of samples turned to pink. The absorbance was measured at 530 nm using a spectrophotometer (Jenway-7300; Bibby Scientific).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The optical density measured using a spectrophotometer (and equivalent intensity of color) was significantly positively correlated with the known lipid content of the standard oil (i.e., Canola oil) (p < 0.01, linear regression ANOVA) (Fig. 1). Furthermore, the r2 value of the standard curve, which was obtained by plotting the optical density as a function of the lipid quantity, was 0.995.

Fig. 1

The standard curve obtained by plotting lipid content (LC, μg lipid) of Canola oil as a function of optical density (OD). The optical density was measured using a spectrophotometer. Symbols represent treatment means ± standard deviation (n = 3). The equation of the curve was y (LC) = 127.95x (OD), r2 = 0.995.

When the lipid contents of the dinoflagellates A. minutum, P. micans, P. minimum, and L. polyedrum were calculated using the standard curve, the lipid amount of each species was also significantly positively correlated with optical density and equivalent intensity of color (p < 0.01 for each of all 4 species, linear regression ANOVA) (Fig. 2). Thus, when comparing color intensity or optical density of samples with these known color intensities or optical densities of each dinoflagellates species, the lipid content of the target species can be easily and rapidly quantified.

Fig. 2

Lipid content (LC, μg lipid) and cell numbers of Prorocentrum minimum (A), Alexandrium minutum (B), P. micans (C), and Lingulodinium polyedrum (D) as a function of the optical density (OD) obtained from samples when measured using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method. Symbols represent treatment means ± standard deviation (n = 3). The equation of the curve was y (LC) = 127.38x (OD), r2 = 0.999 for P. minimum (A); LC = 129.01x, r2 = 0.999 for A. minutum (B); LC = 125.37x, r2 = 0.993 for P. micans (C); LC = 129.29x, r2 = 1 for L. polyedrum (D). Note different scales on axes.

The lipid content per cell of P. minimum which was measured using 1 × 103 or 1 × 104 cells was significantly higher than that measured using the other 6 concentrations of cells (1 × 105 to 2 × 106; p < 0.01, one tailed t-test). However, the lipid content per cell for these 6 concentrations (1 × 105 to 2 × 106) were not significantly different from one another (p > 0.1, ANOVA) (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3

Lipid content per cell (ng lipid cell−1) of Prorocentrum minimum (A), Alexandrium minutum (B), P. micans (C), and Lingulodinium polyedrum (D) measured using the 8 different cell numbers ranging from 1 × 103 to 2 × 106 in the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method. Bars represent treatment means ± standard deviation (n = 3). The open bars indicate that the lipid content per cell of each species at one cell number or lesser cell numbers was significantly higher than those at the greater cell numbers (p < 0.05, one tailed t-test). The closed bars indicate that the lipid content per cell of each species at these cell numbers was not significantly different from one another (p > 0.05, ANOVA test).

The lipid content per cell of A. minutum which was measured using 1 × 103, 1 × 104, or 1 × 105 cells was significantly higher than those measured using the other 5 concentrations of cells (3 × 105 to 2 × 106; p < 0.01, one tailed t-test), however, the lipid content per cell for these 5 concentrations of cells (3 × 105 to 2 × 106) were not significantly different from one another (p > 0.1, ANOVA) (Fig. 3B).

The lipid content per cell of P. micans which was measured using 1 × 103 cells was significantly higher than those measured using the other 7 concentrations of cells (1 × 104 to 2 × 106; p < 0.01, one tailed t-test), but the lipid contents per cell for these 7 concentrations of cells (1 × 104 to 2 × 106) were not significantly different from one another (p > 0.1, ANOVA) (Fig. 3C).

The lipid content per cell of L. polyedrum which was measured using 1 × 103 cells was not significantly different from those measured using the other 7 concentrations of cells (1 × 104 to 2 × 106; p > 0.05, one tailed t-test), and the lipid contents per cell, which were measured using the 8 different concentrations cells (1 × 105 to 2 × 106), were not significantly different from one another (p > 0.1, ANOVA) (Fig. 3D). Therefore, when no more than 104 cells of A. minutum and P. minimum which are <20 μm in ESD cell size are analyzed, the lipid content per cell can be overestimated. Similarly, when no more than 103 cells of P. micans, which is 26 μm in ESD cell size, are analyzed, the lipid content per cell can be overestimated. However, when no less than 103 cells of L. polyedrum which is 38 μm in ESD cell size are analyzed, the lipid content per cell may not be overestimated.

When the lipid content per cell of the 9 dinoflagellate species, a diatom, and a chlorophyte was analyzed using this method, the lipid concentration of L. polyedrum was highest (0.460 ± 0.012 ng lipid cell−1), while that of D. tertiolecta was lowest (0.010 ± 0.002 ng lipid cell−1) (Table 2, Fig. 4). The lipid content per cell of A. minutum measured using the SPV method in this study (0.186–0.345 ng lipid cell−1) was comparable to those measured using other methods (0.288–0.400 ng lipid cell−1) (Table 3). Thus, the SPV method is valid.

Cell volume (CV), lipid content per cell (LCPC), and volume specific lipid content per cell (VLCPC) of the 11 experimental species when measured using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method

Fig. 4

Lipid content per cell (ng lipid cell−1) of the 11 experimental species tested when measured using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method. Bars represent treatment means ± standard deviation (n = 3).

Comparison of the lipid content per cell (LCPC) of the dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum measured using different methods

The lipid content per cell of the 11 microalgal species measured using SPV method increased with increasing the cell size (ESD, μm) with the exception of the diatom Thalassiosira sp. (Fig. 5A). This Thalassiosira sp. had a lipid content much lower than that of the dinoflagellates having similar sizes. The lipid content of all 11 microalgae species, 9 dinoflagellate species, or 8 planktonic species were significantly positively correlated with cell size with different values of r2 (Fig. 5B–D). The benthic dinoflagellate Ostreopsis cf. ovata had a lipid content approximately 25% higher than that of P. micans having a similar size (Fig. 5C).

Fig. 5

Lipid content per cell (LCPC, ng lipid cell−1) of all 11 species (A), the dinoflagellates only (B), and planktonic dinoflagellates only (C) as a function of cell size (equivalent spherical diameter, ESD, μm) when measured using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method. Among the 11 species, the diatom Thalassiosira sp. in (B) and (C) and the benthic dinoflagellate Ostreopsis cf. ovata in (C) were deleted from (A) and (B), respectively. The equation of the curve was y (LCPC) = 0.10x (ESD), r2 = 0.517 (A); LCPC = 0.012x, r2 = 0.813 (B); LCPC = 0.01x, r2 = 0.822 (C).

Among the tested species, the calculated volume of specific lipid content was highest for D. tertiolecta and lowest for Thalassiosira sp. (Fig. 6A). Among the dinoflagellate species tested, A. carterae had the highest volume specific lipid content, while L. polyedrum had the lowest. Furthermore, the volume specific lipid content of all dinoflagellates was significantly negatively correlated with cell size (Fig. 6B).

Fig. 6

Volume specific lipid content per cell (VLCPC, pg lipid cell−1) of all 11 species (A) and the dinoflagellates only (B) as a function of cell size (ESD, μm) when measured using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method. The equation of the curve was y (VLCPC) = −0.0033x (ESD) + 0.12, r2 = 0.674 (A); VLCPC = −0.0017x + 0.083, r2 = 0.799 (B). Lp, Lingulodinium polyedrum; Oo, Ostreopsis cf. ovata; St, Scrippsiella trochoidea; Pmc, Prorocentrum micans; Am, Alexandrium minutum; Om, Oxyrrhis marina; Ht, Heterocapsa triquetra; Pmn, Prorocentrum minimum; Ac, Amphidinium carterae; Th, Thalassiosira sp.; Dt, Dunaliella tertiolecta.

The conventional methods of quantifying the lipid contents of microalgae require large amounts of biomass and thus, usually requires a great deal of time and labor; the processing of samples for gas chromatography analysis may also take several days and be laborious work. The results of this study clearly show that both optical density and intensity of color had strong correlations with the lipid content of each of the 4 dinoflagellates tested and thus, the lipid content of a sample containing each species can be measured using spectrophotometry or even the naked eye. Thus, the SPV method applied in this study can be used as an easy and rapid method of quantifying the lipid content of microalgal species. The dry weight biomass of 105 cells of A. minutum and P. minimum are approximately 0.9 mg and 0.2 mg, respectively. These biomasses are much smaller than the minimum detectable biomasses in the Inouye and Lotufo method (2006), which were 10–50 mg. Therefore, the modified SPV method requires much less biomass than the method described by Inouye and Lotufo (2006).

The lipid content of the diatom Thalassiosira sp. was much lower than that of P. micans which has a similar size, while that of the benthic dinoflagellate O. cf. ovata was much greater. The lipid content of the microalgae tested in this study is significantly negatively correlated with their growth rates (Fig. 7). Therefore, a high growth rate is likely to lower lipid content because lipids are a reserved material (Kagami and Urabe 2001, Converti et al. 2009). In addition, reserving lipids is likely to cause a low growth rate.

Fig. 7

Lipid content per cell (LCPC, ng lipid cell−1) of all 11 species as a function of the specific growth rate (GR, d−1) when measured using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method. The equation of the curve was y (LCPC) = −0.272x (GR) + 0.437, r2 = 0.694. Lp, Lingulodinium polyedrum; Oo, Ostreopsis cf. ovata; St, Scrippsiella trochoidea; Pmc, Prorocentrum micans; Am, Alexandrium minutum; Om, Oxyrrhis marina; Ht, Heterocapsa triquetra; Pmn, Prorocentrum minimum; Ac, Amphidinium carterae; Th, Thalassiosira sp.; Dt, Dunaliella tertiolecta. Specific growth rate data refer to data from Jeong et al. (2005) (Lp), Guerrini et al. (2010) (Oo), Costas (1990) (St), Jeong et al. (2010) (Pmc), Grzebyk et al. (2003) (Am), unpublished data (Om), Hansen (1992) (Ht), Kondo et al. (1990) (Pmn), Furnas (1990) (Ac), and Eppley and Sloan (1966) (Th, Dt).

There have been many studies on the utilization of A. carterae as a source of raw materials for biofuel (Doan et al. 2011, Fuentes-Grünewald et al. 2016). Among the dinoflagellates tested in this study, A. carterae had the highest volume specific lipid content even though its absolute lipid content was lower than several other dinoflagellates. Thus, for the use of raw materials as biofuel, determining volume specific lipid content of a microalgae is important.

CONCLUSION

We applied a method of quantifying lipid content using SPV. In this method, the lipid content of a sample containing each species of dinoflagellates can be measured using spectrophotometry or the naked eye. Furthermore, when this method was used, only 1–3 × 105 cells of P. minimum and A. minutum, 104 cells of P. micans, and 103 cells of L. polyedrum (approximately 1–5 mL of dense cultures) were needed to quantify lipid content per cell. The lipid content per cell of the 9 dinoflagellates tested was significantly positive correlated with cell size, but the volume specific lipid content per cell was negatively correlated with the cell size. Thus, this SPV method is an easy and rapid method of quantifying the lipid content of autotrophic, mixotrophic, and heterotrophic species of dinoflagellates.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by Developing the method of converting food wastes to bioenergy using mass cultured marine protozoa, and the programs “Management of Marine Organisms causing Ecological Disturbance and Harmful Effects” to J. Park and “Useful Dinoflagellate” funded by KIMST/MOF to HJJ.

References

Anderson DM. 1997;Turning back the harmful red tide. Nature 388:513–514.
Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. 1959;A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37:911–917.
Byreddy AR, Gupta A, Barrow CJ, Puri M. 2016;A quick colorimetric method for total lipid quantification in microalgae. J Microbiol Methods 125:28–32.
Coats DW. 1999;Parasitic life styles of marine dinoflagellates. J Eukaryot Microbiol 46:402–409.
Converti A, Casazza AA, Ortiz EY, Perego P, Del Borghi M. 2009;Effect of temperature and nitrogen concentration on the growth and lipid content of Nannochloropsis oculata and Chlorella vulgaris for biodiesel production. Chem. Eng. Process 48:1146–1151.
Costas E. 1990;Genetic variability in growth rates of marine dinoflagellates. Genetica 82:99–102.
de la Jara A, Mendoza H, Martel A, Molina C, Nordströn L, de la Rosa V, Diaz R. 2003;Flow cytometric determination of lipid content in a marine dinoflagellate, Crypthecodinium cohnii. J Appl Phycol 15:433–438.
Doan TTY, Sivaloganathan B, Obbard JP. 2011;Screening of marine microalgae for biodiesel feedstock. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2534–2544.
Drevon B, Schmit JM. 1964;La reaction sulpho-phospho-vanillique dans l’etude des lipides seriques. Bull Trav Soc Pharm Lyon 8:173–178.
Eppley RW, Sloan PR. 1966;Growth rates of marine phytoplankton: correlation with light absorption by cell chlorophyll a. Physiol Plant 19:47–59.
Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. 1957;A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226:497–509.
Fuentes-Grünewald C, Bayliss C, Fonlut F, Chapuli E. 2016;Long-term dinoflagellate culture performance in a commercial photobioreactor: Amphidinium carterae case. Bioresour Technol 218:533–540.
Fuentes-Grünewald C, Garcés E, Alacid E, Sampedro N, Rossi S, Camp J. 2012;Improvement of lipid production in the marine strains Alexandrium minutum and Heterosigma akashiwo by utilizing abiotic parameters. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39:207–216.
Fuentes-Grünewald C, Garcés E, Rossi S, Camp J. 2009;Use of the dinoflagellate Karlodinium veneficum as a sustainable source of biodiesel production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36:1215–1224.
Furnas MJ. 1990;In situ growth rates of marine phytoplankton: approaches to measurement, community and species growth rates. J Plankton Res 12:1117–1151.
Grzebyk D, Béchemin C, Ward CJ, Vérité C, Codd GA, Maestrini SY. 2003;Effects of salinity and two coastal waters on the growth and toxin content of the dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum. J Plankton Res 25:1185–1199.
Guerrini F, Pezzolesi L, Feller A, Riccardi M, Ciminiello P, Dell’Aversano C, Tartaglione L, Dello Iacovo E, Fattorusso E, Forino M, Pistocchi R. 2010;Comparative growth and toxin profile of cultured Ostreopsis ovata from the Tyrrhenian and Adriatic Seas. Toxicon 55:211–220.
Guillard RRL, Ryther JH. 1962;Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Can J Microbiol 8:229–239.
Hallegraeff GM. 1993;A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global increase. Phycologia 32:79–99.
Hansen PJ. 1992;Prey size selection, feeding rates and growth dynamics of heterotrophic dinoflagellates with special emphasis on Gyrodinium spirale. Mar Biol 114:327–334.
Hao Z, Liu P, Yang X, Shi J, Zhang S. 2013;Screening method for lipid-content microalgae based on sulpho-phospho-vanillin reaction. Adv Mater Res 610–613:3532–3535.
Inouye LS, Lotufo GR. 2006;Comparison of macro-gravimetric and micro-colorimetric lipid determination methods. Talanta 70:584–587.
Jacobson DM, Anderson DM. 1996;Widespread phagocytosis of ciliates and other protists by marine mixotrophic and heterotrophic thecate dinoflagellates. J Phycol 32:279–285.
Jeong HJ, Yoo YD, Kang NS, Lim AS, Seong KA, Lee SY, Lee MJ, Lee KH, Kim HS, Shin W, Nam SW, Yih W, Lee K. 2012;Heterotrophic feeding as a newly identified survival strategy of the dinoflagellate Symbiodinium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:12604–12609.
Jeong HJ, Yoo YD, Kim JS, Seong KA, Kang NS, Kim TH. 2010;Growth, feeding, and ecological roles of the mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates in marine planktonic food webs. Ocean Sci J 45:65–91.
Jeong HJ, Yoo YD, Park JY, Song JY, Kim ST, Lee SH, Kim KY, Yih WH. 2005;Feeding by phototrophic red-tide dinoflagellates: five species newly revealed and six species previously known to be mixotrophic. Aquat Microbial Ecol 40:133–150.
Kagami M, Urabe J. 2001;Phytoplankton growth rate as a function of cell size: an experimental test in Lake Biwa. Limnology 2:111–117.
Kondo K, Seike Y, Date Y. 1990;Red tides in the brackish Lake Nakanoumi (II). Relationships between the occurrence of Prorocentrum minimum red tide and environmental conditions. Bull Plankton Soc Jpn 37:19–34.
Lee KH, Jeong HJ, Yoon EY, Jang SH, Kim HS, Yih W. 2014a;Feeding by common heterotrophic dinoflagellates and a ciliate on the red-tide ciliate Mesodinium rubrum. Algae 29:153–163.
Lee SK, Jeong HJ, Jang SH, Lee KH, Kang NS, Lee MJ, Potvin É. 2014c;Mixotrophy in the newly described dinoflagellate Ansanella granifera: feeding mechanism, prey species, and effect of prey concentration. Algae 29:137–152.
Lee SY, Jeong HJ, Kang NS, Jang TY, Jang SH, Lim AS. 2014b;Morphological characterization of Symbiodinium minutum and S. psygmophilum belonging to clade B. Algae 29:299–310.
Malapascua JR, Chou H-N, Lu W-J, Lan JC-W. 2012;Development of an indirect method of microalgal lipid quantification using a lysochrome dye, Nile red. Afr J Biotechnol 11:13518–13527.
Mansour MP, Volkman JK, Jackson AE, Blackburn SI. 1999;The fatty acid and sterol composition of five marine dinoflagellates. J Phycol 35:710–720.
Mishra SK, Suh WI, Farooq W, Moon M, Shrivastav A, Park MS, Yang JW. 2014;Rapid quantification of microalgal lipids in aqueous medium by a simple colorimetric method. Bioresour Technol 155:330–333.
Muscatine L. 1990. The role of symbiotic algae in carbon and energy flux in reef corals. In : Dubinski Z, ed. Coral reefs: ecosystems of the world Elsevier. NY: p. 75–87.
Park J, Jeong HJ, Yoo YD, Yoon EY. 2013;Mixotrophic dinoflagellate red tides in Korean waters: distribution and ecophysiology. Harmful Algae 30(Suppl 1):S28–S40.
Piretti MV, Pagliuca G, Boni L, Pistocchi R, Diamante M, Gazzotti T. 1997;Investigation of 4-methyl sterols from cultured dinoflagellate algal strains. J Phycol 33:61–67.
Smayda TJ. 1997;Harmful algal blooms: their ecophysiology and general relevance to phytoplankton blooms in the sea. Limnol Oceanogr 42:1137–1153.
Stoecker DK. 1999;Mixotrophy among dinoflagellates. J Eukaryot Microbiol 46:397–401.
Vatassery GT, Sheridan MA, Krezowski AM, Divine AS, Bach HL. 1981;Use of the sulpho-phospo-vanillin reaction in a routine method for determining total lipids in human cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Biochem 14:21–24.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

The standard curve obtained by plotting lipid content (LC, μg lipid) of Canola oil as a function of optical density (OD). The optical density was measured using a spectrophotometer. Symbols represent treatment means ± standard deviation (n = 3). The equation of the curve was y (LC) = 127.95x (OD), r2 = 0.995.

Fig. 2

Lipid content (LC, μg lipid) and cell numbers of Prorocentrum minimum (A), Alexandrium minutum (B), P. micans (C), and Lingulodinium polyedrum (D) as a function of the optical density (OD) obtained from samples when measured using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method. Symbols represent treatment means ± standard deviation (n = 3). The equation of the curve was y (LC) = 127.38x (OD), r2 = 0.999 for P. minimum (A); LC = 129.01x, r2 = 0.999 for A. minutum (B); LC = 125.37x, r2 = 0.993 for P. micans (C); LC = 129.29x, r2 = 1 for L. polyedrum (D). Note different scales on axes.

Fig. 3

Lipid content per cell (ng lipid cell−1) of Prorocentrum minimum (A), Alexandrium minutum (B), P. micans (C), and Lingulodinium polyedrum (D) measured using the 8 different cell numbers ranging from 1 × 103 to 2 × 106 in the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method. Bars represent treatment means ± standard deviation (n = 3). The open bars indicate that the lipid content per cell of each species at one cell number or lesser cell numbers was significantly higher than those at the greater cell numbers (p < 0.05, one tailed t-test). The closed bars indicate that the lipid content per cell of each species at these cell numbers was not significantly different from one another (p > 0.05, ANOVA test).

Fig. 4

Lipid content per cell (ng lipid cell−1) of the 11 experimental species tested when measured using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method. Bars represent treatment means ± standard deviation (n = 3).

Fig. 5

Lipid content per cell (LCPC, ng lipid cell−1) of all 11 species (A), the dinoflagellates only (B), and planktonic dinoflagellates only (C) as a function of cell size (equivalent spherical diameter, ESD, μm) when measured using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method. Among the 11 species, the diatom Thalassiosira sp. in (B) and (C) and the benthic dinoflagellate Ostreopsis cf. ovata in (C) were deleted from (A) and (B), respectively. The equation of the curve was y (LCPC) = 0.10x (ESD), r2 = 0.517 (A); LCPC = 0.012x, r2 = 0.813 (B); LCPC = 0.01x, r2 = 0.822 (C).

Fig. 6

Volume specific lipid content per cell (VLCPC, pg lipid cell−1) of all 11 species (A) and the dinoflagellates only (B) as a function of cell size (ESD, μm) when measured using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method. The equation of the curve was y (VLCPC) = −0.0033x (ESD) + 0.12, r2 = 0.674 (A); VLCPC = −0.0017x + 0.083, r2 = 0.799 (B). Lp, Lingulodinium polyedrum; Oo, Ostreopsis cf. ovata; St, Scrippsiella trochoidea; Pmc, Prorocentrum micans; Am, Alexandrium minutum; Om, Oxyrrhis marina; Ht, Heterocapsa triquetra; Pmn, Prorocentrum minimum; Ac, Amphidinium carterae; Th, Thalassiosira sp.; Dt, Dunaliella tertiolecta.

Fig. 7

Lipid content per cell (LCPC, ng lipid cell−1) of all 11 species as a function of the specific growth rate (GR, d−1) when measured using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method. The equation of the curve was y (LCPC) = −0.272x (GR) + 0.437, r2 = 0.694. Lp, Lingulodinium polyedrum; Oo, Ostreopsis cf. ovata; St, Scrippsiella trochoidea; Pmc, Prorocentrum micans; Am, Alexandrium minutum; Om, Oxyrrhis marina; Ht, Heterocapsa triquetra; Pmn, Prorocentrum minimum; Ac, Amphidinium carterae; Th, Thalassiosira sp.; Dt, Dunaliella tertiolecta. Specific growth rate data refer to data from Jeong et al. (2005) (Lp), Guerrini et al. (2010) (Oo), Costas (1990) (St), Jeong et al. (2010) (Pmc), Grzebyk et al. (2003) (Am), unpublished data (Om), Hansen (1992) (Ht), Kondo et al. (1990) (Pmn), Furnas (1990) (Ac), and Eppley and Sloan (1966) (Th, Dt).

Table 1

List of the experimental organisms and their cell size (ESD, μm), trophic modes, and origins

Class Species name ESD (μm) Trophic mode Origin
Dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae 9.8 Mixotrophic USA
Heterocapsa triquetra 15 Mixotrophic Masan bay, Korea
Prorocentrum minimum 12.1 Mixotrophic Kunsan, Korea
Alexandrium minutum 19 Mixotrophic CCMP 113
Oxyrrhis marina 20 Heterotrophic Kunsan, Korea
Scrippsiella trochoidea 22.8 Mixotrophic Jeju, Korea
Ostreopsis cf. ovata 26 Autotrophic Jeju, Korea
Prorocentrum micans 26.6 Mixotrophic Shiwha, Korea
Lingulodinium polyedrum 38.2 Mixotrophic USA
Chlorophyte Dunaliella tertiolecta 5 Autotrophic UTEX
Diatom Thalassiosira sp. 30 Autotrophic Kunsan, Korea

ESD, equivalent spherical diameter.

Table 2

Cell volume (CV), lipid content per cell (LCPC), and volume specific lipid content per cell (VLCPC) of the 11 experimental species when measured using the sulpho-phospho-vanillin method

Species name CV (μm3) LCPC (ng lipid cell−1) VLCPC (pg lipid cell−1)
Amphidinium carterae 493 0.033 ± 0.004 0.064–0.070
Heterocapsa triquetra 1,766 0.081 ± 0.009 0.042–0.052
Prorocentrum minimum 927 0.059 ± 0.018 0.043–0.081
Alexandrium minutum 3,590 0.218 ± 0.029 0.052–0.068
Oxyrrhis marina 4,187 0.180 ± 0.022 0.037–0.047
Scrippsiella trochoidea 6,203 0.321 ± 0.002 0.051–0.052
Ostreopsis cf. ovata 9,198 0.421 ± 0.033 0.042–0.049
Prorocentrum micans 9,850 0.306 ± 0.015 0.029–0.032
Lingulodinium polyedrum 29,172 0.460 ± 0.012 0.015–0.016
Dunaliella tertiolecta 65 0.010 ± 0.002 0.131–0.181
Thalassiosira sp. 14,130 0.032 ± 0.004 0.002–0.003

Table 3

Comparison of the lipid content per cell (LCPC) of the dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum measured using different methods

LCPC (ng lipid cell−1) Analyzing method Reference Culture condition
0.308 Solid phase extraction, GC Fuentes-Grüneward et al. (2009) L2 media, 12 : 12 LD cycle, 21°C
0.288 Microwave assisted extraction, GC Fuentes-Grüneward et al. (2012) L1 media, 12 : 12 LD cycle, 20°C
0.299–0.400 Gravimetric determination Malapascua et al. (2012)
0.186–0.243 Sulpho-phospho-vanillin method This study (cell conc. ca 105) f/2 media, 24 h light, 20°C
0.200–0.345 Sulpho-phospho-vanillin method This study (cell conc. 103-2 × 106) f/2 media, 24 h light, 20°C

Gravimetric determination is the Bligh & Dyer method using chloroform-methanol-DDW extraction.

GC, gas chromatography.