| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
Algae > Volume 40(1); 2025 > Article
Je, Seo, Kim, Kim, Kim, Yu, Jeon, Kim, Chung, An, Rho, and Kim: First evidence of Gymnodimine D in Alexandrium ostenfeldii strain K-1354

ABSTRACT

This study presents a comprehensive analysis of gymnodimine-series toxins produced by Alexandrium ostenfeldii (K-1354) using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Three peaks with identical precursor ions but different retention times were observed, suggesting the presence of isomers identified as gymnodimines B, C, and D. Employing an integrated approach combining LC-MS/MS with electron transfer dissociation, the study revealed the characteristic fragment ions of gymnodimine D. Notably, this study demonstrated the potential for isolating and purifying gymnodimine D from culturable A. ostenfeldii, addressing the current lack of commercially available standards for this isomer. This study contributes remarkably to marine biotoxin monitoring and the understanding of these structurally complex compounds.

INTRODUCTION

Microalgae are crucial primary producers in marine ecosystems (Kim 2019, Motshekga et al. 2023). Through photosynthesis, they contribute to organic matter production, atmospheric carbon dioxide absorption, and subsequent regulation of the marine carbon cycle, while also producing oxygen, that helps maintain a clean marine environment (Gao and Häder 2020, Yadav and Singh 2020). Microalgae serve as an essential source of nutrients for marine organisms (Reitan et al. 2021). Additionally, they help suppress harmful algal blooms (HABs) caused by high nutrient concentrations by absorbing excess nutrients, thereby maintaining the balance of marine ecosystems (Glibert et al. 2018). However, certain microalgal species cause HABs, negatively affecting fisheries, aquaculture, and tourism industries (Oh et al. 2023). The toxins produced by these microalgae can accumulate in marine organisms, particularly filter-feeding shellfish, and can be transferred to higher predators in the food chain (Visciano et al. 2016). Consumption of contaminated seafood can cause food poisoning and other severe health issues. Marine biotoxins play a crucial role in marine ecosystems, posing significant threats to human health and the marine industry (Berdalet et al. 2016, Visciano et al. 2016). Specific marine microorganisms primarily produce these toxins, that can be transferred to higher predators through the food chain (Ferreiro et al. 2015). Human exposure to these toxins can occur through direct contact while swimming in the sea, inhaling aerosolized toxin-containing droplets, or by consuming contaminated seafood. The illness can result from ingesting contaminated seafood, particularly bivalves (e.g., scallops) or gastropods that accumulate marine biotoxins (Sobel and Painter 2005). Marine biotoxins are classified into hydrophilic and lipophilic categories based on their solubility. Based on the symptoms, they can be categorized as paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP), amnesic shellfish poisoning, diarrhetic shellfish poisoning, neurotoxic shellfish poisoning, or ciguatera fish poisoning (Poletti et al. 2003, Friedman et al. 2017). Marine biotoxins can be classified into subgroups based on their chemical structures, including azaspiracids, brevetoxins, cyclic imines (CIs), domoic acid, okadaic acid, pectenotoxins, saxitoxins, yessotoxins, palytoxins, and ciguatoxins (Gerssen et al. 2009, Jiang 2020).
The dinoflagellate Alexandrium ostenfeldii (AO) produces various bioactive compounds, including spirolides (SPX) and gymnodimines (GYMs), that are marine toxins with significant ecological and toxicological effects (Otero et al. 2011). This species is globally distributed, including in regions such as North America, the North Atlantic Ocean, the Arctic Ocean, and the Mediterranean and Baltic Seas (Salgado et al. 2015, Paredes-Banda et al. 2018). According to Marten et al., marine biotoxins detected in 68 strains of AO include paralytic shellfish toxins, such as gonyautoxin (GTX) and saxitoxin (STX), and CI toxins, such as gymnodimine A (GYM A), 12-methyl-gymnodimine A, 13-desmethyl spirolide C, and 27-hydroxy-13-desmethyl spirolide C (Martens et al. 2017). Among these, the highest concentration detected was that of a GYM derivative with a molecular weight of 510 Da, that reached 274,020 pg cell−1. Additionally, Salgado et al. reported the presence of GYM A and B/C derivatives in AO strains collected from the Baltic Sea (Salgado et al. 2015).
GYMs were initially discovered in the dinoflagellate Karenia selliformis and were later identified in other species, including AO (Harju et al. 2016). This group of marine CI toxins is notable for its rapid neurotoxic effects, primarily through the inhibition of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, disrupting synaptic transmission in the nervous system (Kharrat et al. 2008, Molgó et al. 2015, Zurhelle et al. 2018, Nieva et al. 2020). GYM derivatives, including GYM A, B, C, and D, have been detected in various marine environments and are associated with HABs that pose ecological and toxicological risks (Kharrat et al. 2008, Marrouchi et al. 2009, Molgó et al. 2015). K. selliformis, the first species identified to produce GYMs, has been linked to toxic algal blooms causing mass mortality in marine organisms. This species is widely distributed and has been reported in New Zealand, Mexico, Tunisia, Kuwait, Iran, China, and Chile (Marrouchi et al. 2009). Extensive research has been conducted on GYMs produced by K. selliformis, with GYM A being the most well-characterized derivative and commercially available as a standard compound (Marrouchi et al. 2009, Molgó et al. 2015). Recently, AO has emerged as a major producer of GYM derivatives, along with SPX and pinnatoxins. Although GYM D was first identified in the Baltic Sea strains of AO, a study examining 68 strains of this species did not detect GYM D (Martens et al. 2017). These findings underscore the variability in toxin profiles among different strains of AO (Nieva et al. 2020, Alfaro-Ahumada et al. 2024).
In this study, we aimed to establish a novel standard reference material for GYM, a toxin that accumulates and causes toxicity in shellfish. To achieve this, we attempted to synthesize GYM by mass culturing of microalgae. Extraction was performed using the sonication method for AO strain K-1354, and a MeOH extract was obtained using solvent partitioning. The samples were then purified using octadecylsilane (ODS) and solid-phase extraction (SPE) and analyzed using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight (UPLC-Q-TOF) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to identify GYM toxins. In this study, we confirmed the presence of GYM D in the K-1354 strain of AO and established a standard reference material for future research and monitoring.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials and reagents

AO was provided by Water and Eco-Bio (Gunsan, Korea). The solvents and reagents used to obtain methanol extracts from the samples (methanol, acetonitrile [ACN], n-hexane, ammonium formate, and formic acid) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). For the analysis of GYM from AO extract, SPE (Oasis HLB 3cc [60 mg] Extraction Cartridges, WAT094226) and ODS (PREP C18 55–105 μm 125 Å) were purchased from Waters (Milford, MA, USA). All solvents used for MS/MS analysis were of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry grade and purchased from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA). All chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.

Culturing method for Alexandrium ostenfeldii

Culture conditions

The Alexandrium ostenfeldii (AO) strain K-1354 was obtained from The Norwegian Culture Collection of Algae (NORCCA, https://norcca.scrol.net/) in June 2021. AO was cultured and maintained in TL medium supplemented with soil extract as the standard medium (Ellegaard et al. 2004).

Preparation of TL medium

Seawater used for culture preparation was collected from the western coast of Korea. It was mixed with triple-distilled water to adjust the salinity to 10 psu and then filtered using a 0.2 μm pore size membrane filter. The filtered seawater was transferred to an autoclavable polycarbonate bottle and sterilized at 121°C for 30 min under high pressure. After sterilization, the seawater was sealed and cooled to 20°C in a ultraviolet-sterilizable clean bench. The cooled, sterilized seawater was mixed with a pre-prepared medium stock solution filtered through a 0.2 μm sterile syringe filter. The prepared medium was sealed and left to stand for approximately 1 day to ensure complete dissolution of nutrients in the seawater.

Culture maintenance

The initially obtained AO was inoculated by pipetting 1 mL into a 50 mL cell culture flask (SPL 70325) containing 40 mL of TL medium. Prior to inoculation, the flask was rinsed with distilled water to remove internal toxins. All procedures were performed on a clean bench to prevent contamination. As the cell density increased, cultures were maintained in 2 L transparent bottles. Cultures were incubated in a temperature-controlled chamber set at 20°C, with light intensity ranging from 150 to 180 μmol E s−1 m−2, under a light-dark cycle of 14 h : 10 h (L : D cycle). Illumination was performed as described previously.

MeOH extraction of Alexandrium ostenfeldii

A schematic diagram of the extraction method is presented in Supplementary Fig. S1. Briefly, the obtained AO (200 g) was added to 2 L of methanol and stirred thoroughly, followed by extraction at 20–23°C for 15 min. This was repeated three times. After each extraction, the mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm speed using a centrifuge to separate the supernatant, which was then collected and stored. The remaining residue was extracted by adding 2 L of methanol. After completing the three extraction cycles, the extract was concentrated to pH 8.5 using NH4OH, and solvent partitioning was performed using dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) in a 1 : 3 ratio of extract to solvent. The layers were thoroughly separated, and the CH2Cl2 layer was collected and concentrated. The concentrated CH2Cl2 layer was dissolved in 80% MeOH (+20% H2O containing 0.1% formic acid), and solvent partitioning was performed using n-hexane. The aqueous layer was collected, concentrated, and used as the final sample (AO fraction, AOF).

SPE-pretreatment process

To mitigate the matrix effect, that can distort analytical signals due to impurities or interfering substances in the sample, thereby improving the accuracy and reproducibility of the analysis, we used ODS and SPE (Supplementary Fig. S2). Briefly, ODS was packed into an open-column chromatography setup with a diameter of 50 mm and height of 300 mm, filled to a height of 200 mm. The column was conditioned with 100% methanol and equilibrated with 40% ACN containing 2 mM ammonium formate. The AOF was prepared at a concentration of 10 mg mL−1 in 100% methanol, and 5 mL of this solution was loaded onto the column. A mobile phase consisting of 40% ACN with 2 mM ammonium formate was used to elute the sample. The eluted fractions were concentrated using a rotary evaporator and analyzed using UPLC-Q-TOF MS/MS.

MS/MS analysis

Purified AOF was analyzed using UPLC-Q-TOF MS/MS at the Jeonbuk National University Center for University-Wide Research Facilities (Jeonju, Korea). A Xevo G2-XS Q-TOF (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used as the analytical instrument. The column was ACQUITY UPLC BEH C8 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm), and mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ABC DW-10 mM ABC 90% ACN with a gradient method (flow rate 0.2 mL min−1; 0 min 100 : 0 v/v; 0–5 min 100 : 0 v/v; 5–30 min 75 : 25 v/v; 30–35 min 50 : 50 v/v; 35–40 min 0 : 100 v/v; 40–45 min 0 : 100 v/v; 45–45.1 min 100 : 0 v/v; 45.1–50 min 100 : 0 v/v). Gymnodimine mass analysis was performed in positive mode using a Q-TOF MS/MS mass spectrometer. The electrospray ionization-MS/MS conditions were set to a scan range of m/z 100 to 1,200 and a scan rate of 2 spectra/s, and helium was used at a gas temperature of 450°C and 30 L min−1 as the collision gas. The collision energy was set to 20–45 eV. MS and MS/MS chromatograms and spectra were obtained using MassLynx v4.1 SCN888 (Waters Corporation, Wilmslow, UK). Electron transfer dissociation (ETD) was performed according to previously established protocols (Habeck et al. 2024). 1,4-dicyanobenzene was employed as the radical anion source for ETD fragmentation. All experiments were performed using a glow discharge current of 80 μA and a make-up gas flow rate of 50 mL min−1. A capillary voltage ranging from 1.8 to 2.0 kV was applied for the sample analysis with a fixed cone voltage of 50 V. The Trap gas flow was optimized to 15 mL min−1, and the transfer gas flow was set to 0.9 mL min−1. The Trap wave height was adjusted between 0.3 and 0.4 V. The assignment of ETD fragment ions was carried out manually to achieve efficient fragmentation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Culture condition of Alexandrium ostenfeldii

Microalgae exhibit diverse genetic and physiological characteristics at the strain level, that is the final stage of taxonomic classification. These variations influence environmental adaptability, growth rate, nutritional content, and metabolite production. In microalgal research, strain-level characterization is crucial, as it affects the biosynthesis of valuable compounds, such as omega-3 fatty acids, pigments, and antioxidants, remarkably affecting industrial applications. A. ostenfeldii (AO) is a marine dinoflagellate recognized for its production of marine biotoxins, including STX, paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP), and cyclic imine (CI) toxins, such as spirolides (SPX) and gymnodimine (GYM). Numerous AO strains have been identified, with research by Helge Martens et al. (2017) reporting 68 distinct strains in the Netherlands. These strains exhibit variable GYM production, leading to the formation of different derivatives or analogs (Martens et al. 2017). However, limited research has been conducted on the growth rate and toxicity of K-1354 strain. This strain produces marine biotoxins, such as GTX 2/3 and STX (13 dmC) (Kremp et al. 2014). This study aimed to identify the optimal growth conditions for AO based on salinity levels and establish analytical conditions for obtaining new standards. The experiment was conducted under varying salinity conditions while maintaining a constant light intensity, light cycle, and incubation temperature, as outlined in the materials and methods section. Salinity is essential for marine microalgae and influences their growth. Four salinities (5, 10, 20, and 35 psu) were tested. No significant changes in cell counts were observed across all salinity conditions until day 3 (Fig. 1A). Growth increased by 10 psu from day 4, reaching a peak concentration of 18,000 cells mL−1 by day 9. The 5, 20, and 35 psu groups maintained similar cell densities until day 4; however, growth decreased slightly under 35 psu conditions from day 5 onward. In contrast, continuous growth was observed at 5 and 20 psu, with a fourfold difference in cell count compared to that at 10 psu. According to Martens et al. (2016), growth is generally unproblematic at salinities of 6–34 psu. Growth ceased below a salinity of 5 psu, and rapid cell death was observed when transferred from a salinity of 5 to 3 psu. Growth rates ranged from 0.13 to 0.2 d−1, with maximum cell counts reported between approximately 9 × 103 and 12 × 103 cells mL−1. Another study reported a maximum cell count of approximately 22,266 cells mL−1 at 20.9°C and salinity of 17 psu, with GYM A derivatives (12-methyl GYM) reaching up to 73.3 pg per cell. A salinity of 10 psu appears to be optimal for rapid and safe AO growth (Salgado et al. 2015). Salinity significantly affects membrane permeability and osmoregulation; high salinity can cause ion imbalance and osmotic pressure changes across the cell membrane, thereby increasing permeability and reducing physical stability (Shetty et al. 2019, Shahid et al. 2020). High salinity promotes the generation of reactive oxygen species within cells, damaging the photosynthetic machinery, reducing photosynthetic efficiency, and negatively affecting cell growth (Bazzani et al. 2021). AO strain No. K-1354 exhibited a growth rate of approximately 0.21 d−1 under conditions of a light-dark cycle of 14 h : 10 h, light intensity of 80 μmol photon m−2 s−1, temperature of 20°C, and salinity of 10 psu, with a maximum cell count of approximately 40,000 cells mL−1 (Fig. 1B). In medium-scale (20 L) cultures, the relationship between cell quantity and biomass was R2 = 0.6822 (Fig. 1C). The positive correlation between cell quantity and biomass indicated that intracellular material content increased continuously with growth. Research focusing on increasing biomass during microalgal cultivation is ongoing to produce intracellular fatty acids and oils for industrial applications (Maltsev et al. 2021). An increase in biomass relative to cell quantity may also increase GYM production.

MeOH Extraction of Alexandrium ostenfeldii

The extraction and purification of AO samples involved multiple complex and systematic steps that are carefully designed to isolate and concentrate the target compounds from natural substances effectively. First, sonication extraction using 100% MeOH was performed according to the method detailed in Supplementary Fig. S1. This method effectively destroys plant tissues and extracts intracellular substances into solvents (Liu et al. 2022, Lomartire and Gonçalves, 2022). Through this process, 6 L of the AO MeOH extract was obtained, which was sufficient for subsequent analyses. The extracted material was concentrated to dryness using a rotary evaporator, yielding 8.13 g of the AO MeOH extract. The extract was then dissolved in an ammonium hydroxide solution (NH4OH, pH 8.5) for liquid-liquid partitioning. Partitioning was performed using dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) to obtain an organic layer. This extraction was repeated at least three times to ensure exhaustive partitioning before proceeding to the next phase. The resulting organic layer was concentrated to dryness and reconstituted in 80% methanol containing 0.1% formic acid. The second partitioning step was performed using n-hexane. The aqueous layer from the final partitioning was isolated and concentrated to dryness, yielding 1.2 g of sample. The final yield was 0.6% of the initial microalgal biomass (200 g). The fractionated AOMeOH extract was further purified and underwent ODS column chromatography. ODS, a representative stationary phase in reverse-phase chromatography, enables effective separation by strongly interacting with non-polar compounds (Yabré et al. 2018). This process followed the method detailed in Supplementary Fig. S2. The AOF was prepared at a concentration of 10 mg mL−1 and loaded onto an ODS column with a total volume of 5 mL, the optimized concentration and volume considering the column capacity. Subsequently, stepwise elution was performed using 0, 20, 40, and 100% ACN. This stepwise elution method allowed for the effective separation of compounds with different polarities. Each fraction was analyzed using liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight (LC-Q-TOF) MS/MS. This highly sensitive analytical instrument provides accurate mass measurements and structural information, making it useful for identifying target compounds in complex mixtures (Ramos et al. 2023). The results showed that the fraction eluted with 40% ACN contained the highest intensity of the target compound. Based on these results, all subsequent extraction samples were eluted with 40% ACN to obtain the final sample (AO 40). The ODS purification process was repeated until all fractionated AO samples were exhausted, allowing a sufficient amount of the 40% ACN fraction to be obtained. Finally, the separated and purified 40% ACN fraction was further purified using SPE, an effective method for further concentrating the target compounds and removing impurities (Mahdavijalal et al. 2024). Analysis of the results revealed multiple peaks in the total ion chromatogram. Upon examining the MS spectrum of the peaks between 4 and 6 min, which showed the highest intensity (Fig. 2A), m/z 523.33 was detected, prompting further investigation of the XIC for this molecular mass. As shown in Fig. 2B, peaks were observed at 4.10, 4.61, and 5.14 min. A detailed analysis of the MS spectra of these three major peaks revealed that all three exhibited the same precursor ion value of m/z 524.34 (Fig. 2C–E). These results suggested that the analyzed substances may be isomers with the same molecular formula but different structures commonly found in natural products (Huo et al. 2022). Future research will require additional analyses for the accurate structural identification and characterization of these compounds. For example, structural analysis can be performed through NMR spectroscopy, 3D structure confirmation using X-ray crystallography, and biological activity tests (Barba-Ostria et al. 2022). Through such a comprehensive analysis, the complete characterization of these interesting compounds found in the AO sample will be possible, potentially leading to the discovery of new natural substances and important research results.

Structure elucidation of GYM D

Accurate analysis and identification of marine toxins are crucial for public health and for the management of marine ecosystems. In particular, toxins produced by dinoflagellates are gaining worldwide attention because of their toxicity and ecological effect (Deng et al. 2023). This study focused on the analysis and characterization of GYM series toxins produced by AO using LC-MS/MS, an advanced analytical technology. Such research could provide essential baseline data for assessing marine ecosystem health and ensuring the safety of seafood. A notable discovery in the research process was the observation of three peaks with different retention times but identical precursor ions (Fig. 2). This phenomenon strongly suggests the presence of isomers with structurally similar but slightly different properties. The existence of isomers provides significant evidence of the diversity and complexity of marine toxins, and their accurate identification and characterization are key challenges in toxin research (Gerssen et al. 2010). For precise analysis, library matching using Waters Software was performed prior to the MS/MS analysis. This is an effective method for the rapid identification of unknown compounds by comparing them with known compounds. The matching results confirmed that these peaks corresponded to the precursor ions of GYMs B, C, and D. This initial identification plays a crucial role in determining the direction of subsequent analyses. Gymnodimines are primarily produced by marine dinoflagellates and are found in various regions across the globe (McCarron et al. 2014, Van de Waal et al. 2015). They have been detected in large quantities, particularly after prolonged algal blooms along the coasts of New Zealand and Tunisia (Seki et al. 1995). This suggests that GYM production is closely related to specific environmental conditions, highlighting the need for further research on the effects of climate and marine environmental changes on the production and distribution of these toxins. However, the toxicity of GYMs is extremely high. With an LD50 of 96 μg kg−1 when injected and 755 μg kg−1 when administered orally, even small amounts can pose serious health risks. This high toxicity is due to the action of GYMs as neurotoxins that block acetylcholine receptors (Munday et al. 2004). Therefore, the accurate detection and quantification of these toxins are crucial for ensuring seafood safety and protecting public health. AO used in this study has also been confirmed to produce GYMs (Harju et al. 2016). This demonstrates that this species is an important source of GYM and suggests the need for further research on its ecological characteristics and toxin production mechanisms. Gymnodimines B, C, and D had the same natural mass value (m/z 523.32) and similar structural features (Fig. 3). MS/MS analysis detected similar fragment ions, such as m/z 506.35 (with H2O removed) and m/z 162.12 and 136.12, derived from the CI portion (Naila et al. 2012, Martens et al. 2017). These characteristic fragment ion patterns reflect the structural features of GYM series toxins and serve as important indicators for their identification.
Additional analyses were performed on the respective peaks (Fig. 2) to acquire structural data to determine whether these compounds corresponded to GYMs B, C, or D. Previous studies have mainly distinguished these compounds using NMR results of isolated single compounds (Miles et al. 2003, Zurhelle et al. 2018). Although NMR is a powerful tool for elucidating compound structures at the atomic level, it is limited in its ability to analyze trace amounts of compounds present in complex mixtures (Judge and Ebbels 2022). Therefore, an integrated approach utilizing LC-MS/MS and NMR is necessary for the comprehensive characterization of these marine toxins. ETD is a method commonly used in proteomics that analyzes molecules by fragmenting them through a mechanism where electrons are transferred to multiply positively charged peptides, forming radical cations and subsequently cleaving N-Cα bonds (Molina et al. 2008). Unlike Collision-induced dissociation (CID), which primarily cleaves the most labile bonds, ETD induces the fragmentation of precursor ions through a gentler reaction pathway by transferring electrons from radical anions to the analyte, enabling more uniform fragmentation across the molecular structure (Han and Costello 2011). Given the inherent limitations of conventional fragmentation techniques in widely utilized structural analysis instrumentation, we investigated the potential of integrating ETD with CID to augment analytical capabilities and improve structural elucidation methodologies. This approach aims to leverage the complementary strengths of both fragmentation techniques, potentially providing more comprehensive structural information and overcoming the constraints associated with individual methods. The detected peaks were prepared by coupling the same protocol and column used in the LC-Q-TOF MS/MS analysis with UPLC. Because the remaining peaks were identified in very small quantities, making further analysis challenging, the peak detected at 4.61 min was analyzed using ETD. As shown in Fig. 4, a peak at m/z 524.3461 was observed at 4.61 min in the MS/MS spectrum. Upon examining the spectrum, the CI of GYM was observed at m/z 136.1130 and 162.1272 (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, when the intensity of m/z 200–500 in the MS/MS spectrum was lowered, we confirmed the detection of [M+H-H2O] at m/z 506.33, m/z 496.33, without carbon monoxide (CO), and at m/z 402.26, 346.24, and 316.23. These fragment ions are characteristic of GYM D (Harju et al. 2016). When purchasing GYM standards, most are limited to GYM A (MUSECHEM, BENCHCHEM, etc.) and GYM B (LGC). In contrast, other isomers are not commercially available because of difficulties in their isolation and purification. Therefore, this study demonstrates the potential for isolating and purifying GYM D from culturable AO samples. Based on these results, we anticipate the ability to secure standard materials for future monitoring of marine toxin.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study represents a significant advancement in the isolation and characterization of GYM D from culturable A. ostenfeldii. This achievement not only enhances our understanding of marine toxins but also provides a potential source for analytical standards that are crucial for future marine toxin monitoring. The integration of LC-MS/MS technology, microalgal cultivation systems, and isomer identification opens new avenues for marine toxin research. This study has implications beyond academia and potentially contributes to marine ecosystems, seafood safety, and pharmaceutical development. This study demonstrates the value of integrating advanced analytical techniques with biological systems and provides insights into the diversity and complexity of marine toxin production. The identification of isomers underscores the importance of high-resolution analytical methods in marine toxicology. Future research should focus on the accurate structural determination of each isomer, elucidation of their biosynthetic pathways, and a deeper exploration of their ecological roles. These efforts will enhance our understanding of marine toxins, improve ecosystem management, and potentially reveal novel therapeutic agents.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This research was supported by a grant (20163MFDS 641) from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Korea.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary Fig. S1
Schematic representation of the extraction process for microalgae (https://e-algae.org).
algae-2025-40-2-3-Supplementary-Fig-S1.pdf
Supplementary Fig. S2
Schematic diagram of octadecylsilane (ODS) (A) separation and solid-phase extraction (SPE) (B) process for microalgal extract purification (https://e-algae.org).
algae-2025-40-2-3-Supplementary-Fig-S2.pdf

Fig. 1
Growth curve of Alexandrium ostenfeldii in different condition of salinities (A), maximum cell concentration upon the elapsed day (B), and cell number versus biomass correlation (C).
algae-2025-40-2-3f1.jpg
Fig. 2
Liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of purified Alexandrium ostenfeldii fraction. (A) Total ion chromatogram. (B) Extracted ion chromatogram (m/z 524.33). MS spectra of peaks detected at 4.10 min (C), 4.61 min (D), and 5.14 min (E).
algae-2025-40-2-3f2.jpg
Fig. 3
Chemical structures and mass spectrometric data of gymnodimie B, C, and D.
algae-2025-40-2-3f3.jpg
Fig. 4
Product ion and fragment ion spectrum of gymnodimine D. (A) Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) chromatogram of peak detected at 4.61 min. (B) MS/MS spectrum of peak detected at 4.61 min.
algae-2025-40-2-3f4.jpg

REFERENCES

Alfaro-Ahumada, V., Jara-Toro, S., Alves-de-Souza, C., et al. 2024. Allelopathic effect of a Chilean strain of Karenia selliformis (Gymnodiniales, Dinoflagellata) on phytoplankton species. Microorganisms. 12:1834. doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12091834
crossref pmid pmc
Barba-Ostria, C., Carrera-Pacheco, S. E., Gonzalez-Pastor, R., et al. 2022. Evaluation of biological activity of natural compounds: current trends and methods. Molecules. 27:4490. doi.org/10.3390/molecules27144490
crossref pmid pmc
Bazzani, E., Lauritano, C., Mangoni, O., Bolinesi, F. & Saggiomo, M. 2021. Chlamydomonas responses to salinity stress and possible biotechnological exploitation. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 9:1242. doi.org/10.3390/jmse9111242
crossref
Berdalet, E., Fleming, L. E., Gowen, R., et al. 2016. Marine harmful algal blooms, human health and wellbeing: challenges and opportunities in the 21st century. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 96:61–91. doi.org/10.1017/S0025315415001733
crossref pmid pmc
Deng, Y., Wang, K., Hu, Z., Hu, Q. & Tang, Y. Z. 2023. Toxic and non-toxic dinoflagellates host distinct bacterial communities in their phycospheres. Commun. Earth Environ. 4:263. doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00925-z
crossref pdf
Ellegaard, M., Larsen, N. H., Daugbjerg, N., Pedersen, P. M. & Moestrup, O. 2004. The Scandinavian culture centre for algae and protozoa. Nova Hedwigia. 79:93–98. doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2004/0079-0093
crossref
Ferreiro, S. F., Carrera, C., Vilariño, N., et al. 2015. Acute cardiotoxicity evaluation of the marine biotoxins OA, DTX-1 and YTX. Toxins. 7:1030–1047. doi.org/10.3390/toxins7041030
crossref pmid pmc
Friedman, M. A., Fernandez, M., Backer, L. C., et al. 2017. An updated review of ciguatera fish poisoning: clinical, epidemiological, environmental, and public health management. Mar. Drugs. 15:72. doi.org/10.3390/md15030072
crossref pmid pmc
Gao, K. & Häder, D.-P. 2020. Photosynthetic performances of marine microalgae under influences of rising CO2 and solar UV radiation. In : Wang Q., editor Microbial Photosynthesis. Springer, Singapore, 139–150.
crossref pmid
Gerssen, A., Mulder, P. P. J., McElhinney, M. A. & de Boer, J. 2009. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method for the detection of marine lipophilic toxins under alkaline conditions. J. Chromatogr. A. 1216:1421–1430. doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.12.099
crossref pmid
Gerssen, A., Pol-Hofstad, I. E., Poelman, M., Mulder, P. P. J., Van den Top, H. J. & De Boer, J. 2010. Marine toxins: chemistry, toxicity, occurrence and detection, with special reference to the Dutch situation. Toxins. 2:878–904. doi.org/10.3390/toxins2040878
crossref pmid pmc
Glibert, P. M., Heil, C. A., Wilkerson, F. P. & Dugdale, R. C. 2018. Nutrients and harmful algal blooms: dynamic kinetics and flexible nutrition. In : Glibert P., Berdalet E., Burford M., Pitcher G., Zhou M., editors Global Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms. Ecological Stidies. 232:Springer, Cham, 93–112.
crossref pmid
Habeck, T., Maciel, E. V. S., Kretschmer, K. & Lermyte, F. 2024. Charge site manipulation to enhance top-down fragmentation efficiency. Proteomics. 24:2300082 pp.
crossref pmid
Han, L. & Costello, C. E. 2011. Electron transfer dissociation of milk oligosaccharides. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 22:997–1013. doi.org/10.1007/s13361-011-0117-9
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Harju, K., Koskela, H., Kremp, A., et al. 2016. Identification of gymnodimine D and presence of gymnodimine variants in the dinoflagellate Alexandrium ostenfeldii from the Baltic Sea. Toxicon. 112:68–76. doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.01.064
crossref pmid
Huo, Z.-Q., Zhu, F., Zhang, X.-W., et al. 2022. Approaches to configuration determinations of flexible marine natural products: advances and prospects. Mar. Drugs. 20:333. doi.org/10.3390/md20050333
crossref pmid pmc
Jiang, B. 2020. Review on marine biotoxins toxicity and detection methods. In: Proceedings of the 2020 10th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology; Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 28–33. doi.org/10.1145/3397391.3397392
crossref
Judge, M. T. & Ebbels, T. M. D. 2022. Problems, principles and progress in computational annotation of NMR metabolomics data. Metabolomics. 18:102. doi.org/10.1007/s11306-022-01962-z
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Kharrat, R., Servent, D., Girard, E., et al. 2008. The marine phycotoxin gymnodimine targets muscular and neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes with high affinity. J. Neurochem. 107:952–963. doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05677.x
crossref pmid
Kim, S.-K. 2019. Essentials of marine biotechnology. Springer, Cham, 197–227.

Kremp, A., Tahvanainen, P., Litaker, W., et al. 2014. Phylogenetic relationships, morphological variation, and toxin patterns in the Alexandrium ostenfeldii (Dinophyceae) complex: implications for species boundaries and identities. J. Phycol. 50:81–100. doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12134
pmid
Liu, Y., Liu, X., Cui, Y. & Yuan, W. 2022. Ultrasound for microalgal cell disruption and product extraction: a review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 87:106054. doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106054
crossref pmid pmc
Lomartire, S. & Gonçalves, A. M. M. 2022. Novel technologies for seaweed polysaccharides extraction and their use in food with therapeutically applications: a review. Foods. 11:2654. doi.org/10.3390/foods11172654
crossref pmid pmc
Mahdavijalal, M., Petio, C., Staffilano, G., Mandrioli, R. & Protti, M. 2024. Innovative solid-phase extraction strategies for improving the advanced chromatographic determination of drugs in challenging biological samples. Molecules. 29:2278. doi.org/10.3390/molecules29102278
crossref pmid pmc
Maltsev, Y., Maltseva, K., Kulikovskiy, M. & Maltseva, S. 2021. Influence of light conditions on microalgae growth and content of lipids, carotenoids, and fatty acid composition. Biology. 10:1060. doi.org/10.3390/biology10101060
crossref pmid pmc
Marrouchi, R., Benoit, E., Kharrat, R. & Molgó, J. 2009. Gymnodimines: a family of phycotoxins contaminating shellfish. In : Benoit E., Goudey-Perrière F., Marchot P., Servent D., editors Toxins and Signalling, Collection Rencontres en Toxinologie. SFET Publications, Châtenay-Malabry, 79–83.

Martens, H., Tillmann, U., Harju, K., Dell’Aversano, C., Tartaglione, L. & Krock, B. 2017. Toxin variability estimations of 68 Alexandrium ostenfeldii (Dinophyceae) strains from The Netherlands reveal a novel abundant gymnodimine. Microorganisms. 5:29. doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5020029
crossref pmid pmc
Martens, H., Van de Waal, D. B., Brandenburg, K. M., Krock, B. & Tillmann, U. 2016. Salinity effects on growth and toxin production in an Alexandrium ostenfeldii (Dinophyceae) isolate from The Netherlands. J. Plankton Res. 38:1302–1316. doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbw053
crossref
McCarron, P., Wright, E. & Quilliam, M. A. 2014. Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry of domoic acid and lipophilic shellfish toxins with selected reaction monitoring and optional confirmation by library searching of product ion spectra. J. AOAC Int. 97:316–324. doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.sgemccarron
crossref pmid pdf
Miles, C. O., Wilkins, A. L., Stirling, D. J. & MacKenzie, A. L. 2003. Gymnodimine C, an isomer of gymnodimine B, from Karenia selliformis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51:4838–4840. doi.org/10.1021/jf030101r
crossref pmid
Molgó, J., Benoit, E., Aráoz, R., Zakarian, A. & Iorga, B. I. 2015. Spirolides and cyclic imines: toxicological profile. In : Gopalakrishnakone P., Haddad V., Kem W., Tubaro A., Kim E., editors Marine and Freshwater Toxins. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, 193–217. doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6650-1_23-1

Molina, H., Matthiesen, R., Kandasamy, K. & Pandey, A. 2008. Comprehensive comparison of collision induced dissociation and electron transfer dissociation. Anal. Chem. 80:4825–4835. doi.org/10.1021/ac8007785
crossref pmid pmc
Motshekga, S. C., Temane, L. T., Orasugh, J. T. & Ray, S. S. 2023. Marine algae and their importance. In : Soni R., Suyal D. C., Morales-Oyervides L., Fouillaud M., editors Current Status of Marine Water Microbiology. Springer, Singapore, 67–124.
crossref pmid
Munday, R., Towers, N. R., Mackenzie, L., Beuzenberg, V., Holland, P. T. & Miles, C. O. 2004. Acute toxicity of gymnodimine to mice. Toxicon. 44:173–178, PMID: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2004.05.017.
crossref pmid
Naila, I. B., Hamza, A., Gdoura, R., Diogène, J. & de la Iglesia, P. 2012. Prevalence and persistence of gymnodimines in clams from the Gulf of Gabes (Tunisia) studied by mouse bioassay and LC–MS/MS. Harmful Algae. 18:56–64. doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2012.04.004
crossref
Nieva, J. A., Krock, B., Tillmann, U., Tebben, J., Zurhelle, C. & Bickmeyer, U. 2020. Gymnodimine A and 13-desMethyl Spirolide C alter intracellular calcium levels via acetylcholine receptors. Toxins. 12:751. doi.org/10.3390/toxins12120751
crossref pmid pmc
Oh, J.-W., Pushparaj, S. S. C., Muthu, M. & Gopal, J. 2023. Review of harmful algal blooms (HABs) causing marine fish kills: toxicity and mitigation. Plants. 12:3936. doi.org/10.3390/plants12233936
crossref pmid pmc
Otero, A., Chapela, M.-J., Atanassova, M., Vieites, J. M. & Cabado, A. G. 2011. Cyclic imines: chemistry and mechanism of action: a review. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 24:1817–1829. doi.org/10.1021/tx200182m
crossref pmid
Paredes-Banda, P., García-Mendoza, E., Ponce-Rivas, E., et al. 2018. Association of the toxigenic dinoflagellate Alexandrium ostenfeldii with spirolide accumulation in cultured mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) from Northwest Mexico. Front. Mar. Sci. 5:491. doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00491
crossref
Poletti, R., Milandri, A. & Pompei, M. 2003. Algal biotoxins of marine origin: new indications from the European Union. Vet. Res. Commun. 27(Suppl 1):173–182. doi.org/10.1023/b:verc.0000014136.98850.b1
crossref pmid
Ramos, A. C. M., Rezende, K. R., Teixeira, C. M., et al. 2023. Bioanalytical LC-QTOF/MS method for a N-phenylpiperazine derivate (LQFM05): an anxiolytic-and antidepressant-like prototype drug applied to pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies. Pharmaceuticals. 16:930. doi.org/10.3390/ph16070930
crossref pmid pmc
Reitan, K. I., Øie, G., Jørgensen, H. & Wang, X. 2021. Chemical composition of selected marine microalgae, with emphasis on lipid and carbohydrate production for potential use as feed resources. J. Appl. Phycol. 33:3831–3842. doi.org/10.1007/s10811-021-02586-x
crossref pdf
Salgado, P., Vázquez, J. A., Riobó, P., et al. 2015. A kinetic and factorial approach to study the effects of temperature and salinity on growth and toxin production by the dinoflagellate Alexandrium ostenfeldii from the Baltic Sea. PLoS ONE. 10:e0143021. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143021
crossref pmid pmc
Seki, T., Satake, M., Mackenzie, L., Kaspar, H. F. & Yasumoto, T. 1995. Gymnodimine, a new marine toxin of unprecedented structure isolated from New Zealand oysters and the dinoflagellate, Gymnodinium sp. Tetrahedron Lett. 36:7093–7096. doi.org/10.1016/0040-4039(95)01434-J
crossref
Shahid, M. A., Sarkhosh, A., Khan, N., et al. 2020. Insights into the physiological and biochemical impacts of salt stress on plant growth and development. Agronomy. 10:938. doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10070938
crossref
Shetty, P., Gitau, M. M. & Maróti, G. 2019. Salinity stress responses and adaptation mechanisms in eukaryotic green microalgae. Cells. 8:1657. doi.org/10.3390/cells8121657
crossref pmid pmc
Sobel, J. & Painter, J. 2005. Illnesses caused by marine toxins. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41:1290–1296. doi.org/10.1086/496926
crossref pmid
Van de Waal, D. B., Tillmann, U., Martens, H., Krock, B., van Scheppingen, Y. & John, U. 2015. Characterization of multiple isolates from an Alexandrium ostenfeldii bloom in The Netherlands. Harmful Algae. 49:94–104. doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2015.08.002
crossref
Visciano, P., Schirone, M., Berti, M., Milandri, A., Tofalo, R. & Suzzi, G. 2016. Marine biotoxins: occurrence, toxicity, regulatory limits and reference methods. Front. Microbiol. 7:1051. doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01051
crossref pmid pmc
Yabré, M., Ferey, L., Somé, I. T. & Gaudin, K. 2018. Greening reversed-phase liquid chromatography methods using alternative solvents for pharmaceutical analysis. Molecules. 23:1065. doi.org/10.3390/molecules23051065
crossref pmid pmc
Yadav, N. & Singh, D. P. 2020. Microalgae and microorganisms: important regulators of carbon dynamics in wetland ecosystem. In : Upadhyay A., Singh R., Singh D., editors Restoration of Wetland Ecosystem: A Trajectory towards a Sustainable Environment. Springer, Singapore, 179–193.
crossref pmid
Zurhelle, C., Nieva, J., Tillmann, U., Harder, T., Krock, B. & Tebben, J. 2018. Identification of novel gymnodimines and spirolides from the marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium ostenfeldii. Mar. Drugs. 16:446. doi.org/10.3390/md16110446
crossref pmid pmc
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
ePub Link  ePub Link
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Supplement Supplement1
Supplement Supplement2
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
0
Crossref
0
Scopus
540
View
52
Download
Related article
Editorial Office
[14348] A-1716, Gwangmyeong Trade Center, 72 Iljik-ro Gwangmyeong-si. Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Tel: +82-2-899-5980  Fax: +82-2-899-5922    E-mail: editalgae@gmail.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Society of Phycology.                 Developed in M2PI