| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
Algae > Volume 39(2); 2024 > Article
Oteng’o, Won, and Cho: Ramipedicella gen. nov. (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae): a new crustose brown algal genus including two species, Ramipedicella miniloba sp. nov. and Ramipedicella longicellularis comb. nov.

ABSTRACT

The Ralfsiaceae family, part of the Ralfsiales order and consisting of crustose brown algae, includes five genera: Analipus, Endoplura, Fissipedicella, Heteroralfsia, and Ralfsia. In this study, a novel crustose genus named Ramipedicella gen. nov. is introduced within the Ralfsiaceae based on molecular and morphological analyses. Phylogenetic analyses using both concatenated dataset (rbcL + COI-5P genes) and rbcL indicate that the crustose brown algae that we collected from Korea and Russia form a unique grouping within the Ralfsiaceae. This grouping is strongly supported by both bootstrap analysis and Bayesian posterior probabilities. The genetic differences in the rbcL and COI-5P sequences between Ramipedicella and other genera within Ralfsiaceae range from 6.7 to 9.3% for rbcL and from 15.5 to 20.8% for COI-5P. Ramipedicella is characterized by crustose thalli having new crusts growing on top of old ones with a hypothallial basal layer and erect perithallial filaments, long cells with width-to-length ratio of 1 : 1–16, single chloroplast per cell, plurangia with one to several sterile cells, one to several unangia produced from unicellular stalks or from the lateral-basal region to the paraphyses, and unangia arising sequencially in irregularly branched specialized filaments. Ramipedicella, the recently identified genus, comprises two distinct species. Ramipedicella miniloba, the type species, is distinguished by crusts with small lobes, numerous hair tufts, plurangia terminated by 1–4 sterile cells, and large oblong unangia. Ramipedicella longicellularis is identified by generally smooth crusts, absence of phaeophycean hairs, plurangia terminated by 1–2 apical sterile cells, and smaller mostly oblanceolate unangia.

INTRODUCTION

Farlow (1881) was the first to describe the Ralfsiaceae, which has been recognized as the largest family within the order Ralfsiales. Ralfsiaceae has been characterized by rounded to irregularly spreading crust, basal layer composed of radiating appressed filaments, and tightly appressed erect vegetative filaments, single or few chloroplasts per cell, plurangial reproductive structures topped with sterile cell(s), unangia accompanied by paraphysis on the terminal part of erect filaments, diplohaplontic and isomorphic or heteromorphic life history (Farlow 1881, Setchell and Gardner 1924, Abbott and Hollenberg 1976, Womersley 1987, Parente and Saunders 2019, Oteng’o et al. 2023b). Currently, the family Ralfsiaceae comprises five recognized genera: Analipus Kjellman, Endoplura Hollenberg, Fissipedicella A. O. Oteng’o, B. Y. Won & T. O. Cho, Heteroralfsia Kawai, and Ralfsia Berkeley (Lim et al. 2007, Silberfeld et al. 2014, Parente and Saunders 2019, Guiry and Guiry 2023, Oteng’o et al. 2023b). Traditionally, the recognition of genera within Ralfsiaceae has been based on morphological characters such as thallus type, number of sterile cells on plurangia, number of chloroplasts per cell, and the development of unangia (Tanaka and Chihara 1981b, Lim et al. 2007, León-Álvarez et al. 2017, Oteng’o et al. 2021, Parente et al. 2021). However, due to the morphological simplicity and external similarities among them, the classification of these genera has been challenging. Recent molecular analyses are increasing the taxonomic resolution of these genera within Ralfsiaceae, providing a clearer depiction of their phylogenetic relationships (Lim et al. 2007, Silberfeld et al. 2014, Parente and Saunders 2019, Oteng’o and Won 2020, Oteng’o et al. 2021, 2023a, 2023b).
In recent studies conducted by Oteng’o et al. (2021, 2022, 2023a, 20233b), using molecular analyses, new findings about crustose brown algae in Korea have been revealed: Fissipedicella (F. orientalis A. O. Oteng’o, B. Y. Won & T. O. Cho), Sungminia Oteng’o, Won & T. O. Cho (Sungminia gladiata Oteng’o, Won & T. O. Cho, S. pyriformis Oteng’o, Won & T. O. Cho and S. asiatica Oteng’o, Won & T. O. Cho), and four new species within Endoplura (E. jejuensis A. O. Oteng’o, T. O. Cho & B. Y. Won, E. koreana A. O. Oteng’o, T. O. Cho & B. Y. Won, E. gyeokpoensis Oteng’o, B. Y. Won & T. O. Cho, and E. limpeticola Oteng’o, B. Y. Won & T. O. Cho). Also, Ralfsia longicellularis Perestenko has been added as a new record in Korea based on morphological and molecular analyses (Oteng’o and Won 2020). These findings showed the possibility that Korea may be one of the hotspots for crustose brown algal biodiversity (Oteng’o et al. 2023b).
We gathered several unidentified samples of crustose brown algae resembling Ralfsia from the coastal shores of Korea and samples labeled as Ralfsia longicellularis collected from both Korean and Far East Russian coastal shores. This study employed a dual approach involving morphological characterization and the molecular analyses of rbcL and the 5’ region of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI-5P) gene sequences. As a result, we propose Ramipedicella gen. nov. including Ramipedicella miniloba sp. nov. and Ramipedicella longicellularis comb. nov.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DNA extraction and amplification

We collected samples from intertidal areas of Korea and Far East Russia from 2013 to 2020 (Supplementary Table S1). Genomic DNA extraction was performed using the NucleoSpin Plant II Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was stored at −20°C and used to amplify the rbcL and COI-5P genes. Polymerase chain reactions were conducted following the protocol for the HelixAmpTM Ready-2x-Go premix (NanoHelix Co., Ltd., Daejeon, Korea). The primers used to amplify rbcL and COI-5P were the same as those used in previous study by Oteng’o et al. (2021).

Sequence analyses

The nucleotide sequence used in this study was compiled from existing published sequences in GenBank along with newly generated sequences, consisting of 26 rbcL and 7 COI-5P sequences (Supplementary Table S1). The sets of 78 concatenated sequences (rbcL + COI-5P) and 78 rbcL were aligned. The unavailable COI-5P sequences in GenBank were regarded as missing data in our analysis of the concatenated dataset. Cladostephus spongiosus (Hudson) C. Agardh and Microzonia phinneyi (E. C. Henry & D. G. Müller) Camacho & Fredericq were chosen as outgroup taxa. The alignment of sequences was conducted using ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1994), followed by manual editing using Geneious Prime (v.2023.0.1; Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand). We used PartitionFinder 2 (Lanfear et al. 2017) to determine the best partition scheme and model selection for the concatenated sequences. Maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis was estimated by the GTR + Γ + I model with 1,000 bootstrap replications using RAxMLGUI v1.5 (Silvestro and Michalak 2012). Bayesian inference (BI) was conducted with MrBayes 3.2.6 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001, Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). Markov chain Monte Carlo runs were executed for 2,000,000 generations with one cold chain and three heated chains, using the GTR + Γ + I evolutionary model. Trees were sampled every 1,000 generations. Summary trees were generated using a 25% burn-in value. Convergence was evaluated with Tracer v.1.7.2 (Rambaut et al. 2018). For the analysis of rbcL sequences, we used the same outgroup and Mega X (Kumar et al. 2018) to determine the optimal model. ML analysis was estimated by the Tamura 3-parameter + Γ + I model with 1,000 bootstrap replications using Mega X (Kumar et al. 2018). BI was performed using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001, Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). Markov chain Monte Carlo runs were carried out for 2,000,000 generations, with one cold chain and three heated chains, using the T92 + Γ + I evolutionary model. Trees were sampled every 1,000 generations. Summary trees were generated using a burn-in value of 25%. Phylogenetic trees were visualized using FigTree v.1.4.0 (Rambaut 2012). Genetic distances were determined using the p-distance method in Mega X as described by Kumar et al. (2018).

Morphological analyses

A waterproof digital camera (Nikon COOLPIX AW100; Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used to photograph the external morphological characteristics of the samples. Using a single-edged blade, the samples were carefully detached from the substrate. Microtome sections were then prepared from selected portions from each sample and mounted on microscopy slides to facilitate observation of their internal morphology. In the microtome-sectioned preparations, samples were embedded in a matrix (OCT; CellPath, Ltd., Newtown, Wales, UK) and then sectioned with a freezing microtome (Shandon Cryotome FSE; Thermo Shandon, Ltd., Loughborough, UK) at a thickness of 8–10 μm.
The sliced and squashed samples were stained with a mixture of aqueous aniline blue and acetic acid in a 1 : 1 ratio to enhance visualization and analysis. Following staining, the sections were mounted in 50% corn syrup and examined under a microscope. Photographs of the samples were captured using a DP-71 camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) mounted on a BX-51TRF microscope (Olympus). Adobe Photoshop software v.6.1 (Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) was used for editing the digitized images. Voucher specimens were stored in the herbarium collections of Chosun University (CUK) and the Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (MABIK), Korea.

RESULTS

Phylogenetic analyses

A sum of 26 rbcL sequences, with a length of 984 base pairs (bp), and 6 COI-5P sequences, with a length of 654 bp, were obtained from recently collected samples originating from Korea and the Far East of Russia (Supplementary Table S1). The phylogenetic tree inferred from concatenated dataset (rbcL + COI-5P) indicated that both the unidentified Ralfsia-like crustose algae from Korea and Ralfsia longicellularis from Korea and Far East Russia formed a distinct clade, Ramipedicella gen. nov., within the family Ralfsiaceae (Fig. 1). Phylogenetic analyses based on the rbcL sequences showed overall congruency with concatenated phylogeny (Supplementary Fig. S1). The two lineages within Ramipedicella are recognized as distinct species, Ramipedicella miniloba sp. nov. and Ramipedicella longicellularis comb. nov. The significant genetic differences were observed in rbcL (6.7–9.3%) and COI-5P (15.5–20.8%) sequences between Ramipedicella and other genera within Ralfsiaceae (Table 1). The genetic divergence between R. miniloba and R. longicellularis was 1.6–1.7% for rbcL and 7.7–8.7% for COI-5P.

Morphological observations

Ramipedicella A. O. Oteng’o, B. Y. Won & T. O. Cho gen. nov

Description

Thalli are epilithic or epizoic, crustose with circular to irregular outline, firmly attached to the substratum with or without rhizoids. They are multistratose owing to superimposed thalli. They comprise two main parts: the hypothallial basal layer and the perithallial erect filament. Hypothallial layer is formed by several prostrate cells, giving rise to firmly adjoined, assurgent, and usually branched perithallial erect filaments. Chloroplasts are one per cell. Phaeophycean hairs are present or absent. Sori develop in elevated patches. Plurangial reproductive structures are uniseriate, occasionally biseriate, subterminal on erect filaments, and terminated by one to several sterile cells. One to several unangia arise on branched stalks with paraphyses or on lateral-basal region to the paraphyses. Paraphyses arise laterally on stalks.

Type species

Ramipedicella miniloba.

Etymology

The name “Ramipedicella” refers to branched unangial stalk (pedicel).

Korean name

겹딱지속.

Ramipedicella miniloba A. O. Oteng’o, B. Y. Won & T. O. Cho sp. nov. (Fig. 2)

Description

Thalli are thick, epilithic or epizoic crusts, light to dark brown (almost black in dry state) with lighter margins, circular to irregular in outline, with external concentric zones and radial lines, with small lobes mostly towards the center making the surface uneven, up to 15 cm across, and 300–1,650 μm thick (Fig. 2A & B). Thalli are multistratose owing to superimposed ones composed of 1–4 plant layers (Fig. 2C). The hypothallial basal layer consists of multiple cell layers, where the cells are 7–15 μm wide and have a width-to-length ratio of 1 : 1–12. These cells give rise to erect perithallial filaments. The erect perithallial filaments are branched, straight, or upwardly curved, tapering towards the surface. They are tightly adjoined to each other, forming pseudoparenchymatous tissue (Fig. 2D). Cells of erect perithallial filaments are 3–12 μm wide and with a width-to-length ratio of 1 : 1–16. The chloroplast is parietal and one per cell, mostly on the apical part of the cell. Tufts of hairs in sunken curved cryptostome-like pits are numerous and arise from the mid to basal parts of the erect perithallial filaments (Fig. 2E). Rhizoids are unevenly scattered, consisting of multiple cells with 6–15 μm in width (Fig. 2F). The reproductive portions, including plurangial and unangial sori, form elevated areas on different thalli (Fig. 2G, H & J). Plurangial reproductive structures are intercalary, measuring 65–153 μm in length, composed of 1–2 reproductive filaments, and terminated by 1–4 sterile cells (Fig. 2G & I). Sterile cells are elongated rod-shaped, 4–12 μm wide, and 1.5–4 times as long as the width (Fig. 2I). The unangial reproductive sori have two types of filaments, paraphyses and irregularly branched filaments with unangia arising sequentially from mainly unicellular stalks (Fig. 2J & K). The paraphyses arise from the same filaments that produce the unangia. They are clavate, composed of 14–20 cells, 114–363 μm long, and 3–16 μm wide. Mature unangium has a single-celled stalk supported by a cell that branches and also produces another unicellular stalk with a terminal unangium primordium (Fig. 2K). Unangia are oblong, 90–180 μm long, 20–46 μm wide, and positioned centrally among surrounding filaments (Fig. 2J & K).

Holotype

MABIK AL00100600 (= CUK20165) deposited in MABIK herbarium.

Type locality

Hwasam-ri183-7, Yongnam-myeon, Tongyeong-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea (34°51′08.07″ N, 128°27′03.36″ E).

Isotype

CUK20166, CUK20168, CUK20169, CUK20170, CUK20171, and CUK20172 deposited in CUK herbarium.

Etymology

The specific epithet “miniloba” refers to small lobe structures on the surface of thalli.

Korean name

겹딱지.

DNA sequences of type specimens

For holotype MZ173528 (rbcL) and MZ173506 (COI-5P).

Paratypes

CUK13559 (Jan 22, 2015; Bangeojin, Bangeo-dong, Dong-gu, Ulsan, Korea); CUK18162A, CUK18164A (Jul 8, 2017; Cheongsapo, Jung-dong, Haeundae-gu, Busan, Korea); CUK18395, CUK18396, CUK18397, CUK18398, CUK18399 (Nov 18, 2017; Daecheon Beach, Sinheuk-dong, Boryeong-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea); CUK18400, CUK18401, CUK18402, CUK18404, CUK18405 (Nov 17, 2017; Chaeseokgang, Buan-gun, Jeollabuk-do, Korea); CUK18428A, CUK18432, CUK18440A, CUK18445A, CUK18449, CUK18452 (Nov 3, 2017; Dala park, Sanyang-eup, Tongyeong-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea); CUK18457, CUK18458, CUK18459, CUK18460 (Nov 4, 2017; Yeonhwa-ri, Gijang-eup, Gijang-gun, Busan, Korea); CUK18729B, CUK18730, CUK18731 (Mar 1, 2018; Cheongsapo, Jung-dong, Haeundae-gu, Busan, Korea); CUK18737A, CUK18738B (Mar 1, 2018; Yeonhwa-ri, Gijang-eup, Gijang-gun, Busan, Korea); CUK18751, CUK18753, CUK18755A, CUK18768 (Mar 3, 2018; Pado-ri, Sowuon-myeon, Taean-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea); CUK18823 (Apr 1, 2018; Jeongdo-ri, Wando-eup, Wando-gun, Jeollanam-do, Korea); CUK18883 (Apr 29, 2018; Bangjukpo, Dolsan-eup, Yeosu-si, Jeollanam-do, Korea); CUK18972 (May 18, 2018; Seosang, Seo-myeon, Namhae-gun, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea); CUK19150 (Oct 3, 2018; Chaeseokgang, Byeonsan-myeon, Buan-gun, Jeollabuk-do, Korea); CUK19215A, CUK19217A, CUK19218A, CUK19219A, CUK19222A, CUK19225A (Nov 3, 2018; Pado-ri, Sowuon-myeon, Taean-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea); CUK19794 (Jul 26, 2019; Gyeokpo Port, Byeonsan-myeon, Buan-gun, Jeollabuk-do, Korea); CUK19813A, CUK19823 (Aug 1, 2019; Oeyeondo, Ocheon-myeon, Boryeong-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea); CUK20066D (Oct 28, 2019; Hwasam-ri, Yongnam-myeon, Tongyeong-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea); CUK20165, CUK20166 (Feb 8, 2020; Hwasam-ri183-7, Yongnam-myeon, Tongyeong-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea); CUK20578, CUK20585, CUK20589 (Aug 5, 2020; Jeongdo-ri, Wando-eup, Wando-gun, Jeollanam-do, Korea); CUK20613A (Aug 12, 2020; Chunghwa-dong Port, Baekryeongdo, Incheon, Korea); CUK20649 (Aug 12, 2020; Dumunjin Port, Baekryeongdo, Incheon, Korea); CUK20666C, CUK20673A, CUK20676A, CUK20677 (Aug 12, 2020; Gobong Port, Baekryeongdo, Incheon, Korea).

Reproductive phenology

Plants with plurangial and unangial reproductive structures were collected during January and February.

Distribution and habitat

This species has been observed in various localities along the eastern coast (Busan and Ulsan), western coast (Baekryeongdo, Boryeong, Buan, and Taean) and southern coast (Namhae, Tongyeong, Wando, and Yeosu), Korea. Plants are found on hard substrates, including pebbles and rocks and seldom on shells of molluscs in the intertidal zone.

DISCUSSION

Oteng’o et al. (2023b) recognized a unique and unidentified clade within Ralfsiaceae based on specimens collected in Korea and Far East Russia. They classified this clade as incertae sedis. In this study, we have focused on researching a greater number of samples belonging to the incertae sedis clade. We suggest the establishment of Ramipedicella gen. nov. based on morphological and molecular examinations to incorporate this unidentified group. The genetic divergences between Ramipedicella and other genera in the Ralfsiaceae have been determined to be ≥6.7–9.3% for rbcL and ≥15.5–20.8% for COI-5P, surpassing the corresponding values observed among the already acknowledged genera (Oteng’o et al. 2023b). Our phylogenetic analyses based on both the concatenated (rbcL + COI-5P) and rbcL datasets indicate that Ramipedicella is closely related to Endoplura and Fissipedicella, forming a sister relationship (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. S1). Although Endoplura shows a sister relationship with our Ramipedicella, it is distinguished from Ramipedicella by having several chloroplasts per cell, sessile unangia and 2–5 plurangial reproductive filaments (Hollenberg 1969, Tanaka and Chihara 1981b, Lim et al. 2007, Oteng’o et al. 2021, 2023a). Also, Fissipedicella is distinguished from Ramipedicella by having unistratose thalli and unangia on stalks with vertically or obliquely cleaved cells (Oteng’o et al. 2023b). Our new genus, Ramipedicella, is distinguished from the other genera within the Ralfsiaceae by having multistratose thalli and one to several unangia arising from unicellular stalks in specialized branched filaments or on lateral-basal region to the paraphyses (Table 2). A combination of characters is often used in the identification of different taxa within the Ralfsiales.

Key to genera within Ralfsiaceae

  • 1. Plants with heteromorphic thalli, crustose portion bearing plurangia, and erect sporophytic thalli bearing unangia ........................................................... Heteroralfsia

  • 1. Plants with isomorphic thalli, either crustose or erect thalli bearing both plurangia and unangia ...................... 2

    • 2. Thalli erect ..................................................... Analipus

    • 2. Thalli crustose ............................................................ 3

  • 3. Chloroplasts per cell several, plurangial reproductive filaments 2–5 ...................................................... Endoplura

  • 3. Chloroplast per cell single, plurangial reproductive filaments 1–2 ............................................................................ 4

    • 4. Thalli multistratose, one to several unangia on specialized branched filaments or lateral-basal region to the paraphyses ………………………......…. Ramipedicella

    • 4. Thalli unistratose or multistratose, one unangia on unbranched filament or lateral-basal region to the paraphyses .......................................................................... 5

  • 5. Tufts of hair in pits present, stalk composed of 1–6 vertically or obliquely cleaved cells .................. Fissipedicella

  • 5. Tufts of hairs in pits absent, stalk composed of 1–2 horizontally cleaved cells ............................................... Ralfsia

The detailed morphology of unangia has been recognized as a crucial characteristic in the classification of crustose brown algae, particularly within the Ralfsiales. It has been applied in delineating various taxonomic ranks within this group (Tanaka and Chihara 1981b, León-Alvarez and González-González 2003, Lim et al. 2007, León-Alvarez et al. 2017, Parente et al. 2021, Oteng’o et al. 2023b). The diverse morphological features observed in unangia, including stalk-like filaments, paraphyses, and the positioning of unangia, suggest that these reproductive structures could carry taxonomic importance within distinct groups at different levels within the Ralfsiales (Oteng’o et al. 2023b). According to Oteng’o et al. (2023b), there are two main types of unangia: those with paraphyses and those without. A paraphysis is considered a cell or filament arising from a vegetative or reproductive filament adjacent to the reproductive structures and its probable function is providing protection (León-Álvarez and Norris 2005). Apart from the paraphyses, the presence or absence, as well as the morphology of stalks, represents another important aspect. Ramipedicella produces unangia with paraphyses, similar to species of Endoplura, Fissipedicella and Ralfsia within Ralfsiaceae (Hollenberg 1969, Tanaka and Chihara 1981a, Xiyi and Junfeng 1993, Oteng’o et al. 2021, 2023a, 2023b). However, Ramipedicella differs in that it has one to several unangia on specialized branched filaments, whereas the latter three genera have sessile unangia or unangia on uniseriate stalks. With the exception of Ramipedicella, there are no reports of branched stalks in any other genera within the Ralfsiaceae.
Our phylogenetic analyses reveal that the new genus, Ramipedicella, is composed of two distinct species: R. miniloba sp. nov. and “Ralfsia longicellularis”. Although the two species share similarities, R. miniloba is distinguished from Ralfsia longicellularis by crusts with small lobes, numerous hair tufts, plurangia terminating with 1–4 sterile cells, and large oblong unangia. Ralfsia longicellularis was originally described from Russia by Perestenko (1980) and has only been described and reported from Russia (Kozhenkova 2009). Recently, this species was added as new recorded species in list of Korean macroalgal flora by Oteng’o et al. (2020) based on comparison of rbcL genetic analyses and morphology between Korean and Vladivostok samples. However, phylogenetically, “Ralfsia longicellularis” was clearly distinguished as a different species from other species of Ralfsia (Oteng’o et al. 2023b) and reported as Endopluraean sp. 1GWS, positioning it within a closely related taxon with Endoplura by Parente and Saunders (2019). Oteng’o et al. (2023b) clarified that it may belong to a novel genus, representing a distinct unidentified taxon (incertae sedis) comprised of “Ralfsia longicellularis” and Endopluralean sp. 1GWS within the Ralfsiaceae. On the basis of both the concatenated (rbcL + COI-5P) and rbcL gene phylogeny and morphological features, we hereby transfer Ralfsia longicellularis to Ramipedicella.

Ramipedicella longicellularis (Perestenko) A. O.Oteng’o, B. Y. Won & T. O. Cho comb. nov. (Fig. 3)

Basionym

Ralfsia longicellularis Perestenko 1980: 193, figs 308, 309 [The Seaweeds of Peter the Great Bay. Akademia NAUK SSSR, Leningrad, Russia, 231 pp.].

Type locality

Peter the Great Bay, Russia (Perestenko 1980).

Korean name

긴세포겹딱지.

Specimens examined

CUK10442 (Oct 24, 2013; Jeongdo-ri, Wando-eup, Wando-gun, Jeollanam-do, Korea); CUK17342 (May 20, 2016; Sa-ri, Heuksan-myeon, Sinan-gun, Jeollanam-do, Korea); CUK18766 (Mar 3, 2018; Pado-ri, Sowuon-myeon, Taean-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea); CUK18819, CUK18824 (Apr 1, 2018; Jeongdo-ri, Wando-eup, Wando-gun, Jeollanam-do, Korea); CUK19221, CUK19224 (Nov 3, 2018; Pado-ri, Sowuon-myeon, Taean-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea); CUK19270 (Jan 26, 2019; Chaeseokang, Byeonsan-myeon, Buan-gun, Jeollabuk-do, Korea); CUK20022, CUK20023, CUK20025, CUK20026, CUK20027, CUK20028, CUK20029, CUK20030, CUK20031, CUK20032 (Oct 10, 2019; Ulitsa Leytenanta Shmidta, Vladivostok, Russia); CUK20611A, CUK20616A, CUK20617 (Aug 12, 2020; Chunghwa-dong Port, Baekryeongdo, Incheon, Korea); CUK20650B, CUK20653B, MABIK AL00100601(= CUK20659) (Aug 12, 2020; Dumunjin Port, Baekryeongdo, Incheon, Korea); CUK20664A, CUK20664C (Aug 12, 2020; Gobong Port, Baekryeongdo, Incheon, Korea).

Reproductive phenology

Plants with plurangial reproductive structures were collected from the Korean coast in March. Unangia bearing plants were collected from Vladivostok, Russia in October.

Distribution and habitat

This species grows in various localities along the western coast (Baekryeongdo, Buan, Sinan, and Taean) and southern coast (Wando), Korea. Outside Korea, the species is found in the Canadian Pacific (as Endopluralean sp._1GWS) and Far East Russia (Fig. 4). Plants grow on hard substrates, including pebbles, small boulders and rocks in the intertidal zone.
The genetic distances between Ramipedicella miniloba and R. longicellularis were shown to be 1.6–1.7 and 7.7–8.7% for rbcL and COI-5P, respectively, values that are comparable to genetic divergences between other species in the Ralfsiales (Parente and Saunders 2019, Parente et al. 2021, Oteng’o et al. 2023a). Although the two species show resemblance to one another, Ramipedicella longicellularis differs from R. miniloba by having generally smooth crusts, absence of phaeophycean hairs, plurangia terminated by 1–2 apical sterile cells, and smaller mostly oblanceolate unangia.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to anonymous reviewer for the detailed comments and Prof. K. Y. Kim for many constructive suggestions to improve the manuscript. This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2021R1I1A2059577), by the Ministry of Ocean and Fisheries (Marine Biotics Project, 20210469), and by the National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea (the management of Marine Fishery Bio-resources Center 2024) to Tae Oh Cho. This research was also supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2021R1I1A1A01051909) to Boo Yeon Won.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary Table S1.
Taxa included in the phylogeny analyses, along with voucher / strain information, collection locality and / or date, GenBank accession numbers for rbcL and COI-5P, and corresponding references (https://www.e-algae.org).
algae-2024-39-2-97-Supplementary-Table-S1.pdf
Supplementary Fig. S1
Phylogenetic tree of Ralfsiales inferred from rbcL dataset (https://www.e-algae.org).
algae-2024-39-2-97-Supplementary-Fig-S1.pdf

Fig. 1
Phylogenetic tree of Ralfsiales inferred from the concatenated dataset (rbcL + 5′ region of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I [COI-5P]). Maximum likelihood bootstrap (BS) values (≥50) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (≥0.75) are shown for maximum likelihood (top) and Bayesian analysis (bottom). Hyphens (−) represent values of <50 for BS or 0.75 for Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP). Asterisks (*) represent values of 100 for BS or 1.00 for BPP. GenBank accession numbers of each sequence dataset are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Bold font indicate species analyzed in this study. Branch length are proportional to substitution rate.
algae-2024-39-2-97f1.jpg
Fig. 2
Morphology of Ramipedicella miniloba sp. nov. (A) Thalli on the rock forming epilithic dark brown crusts with light margins and small lobes (arrows) towards the center. (B) Cross-section view of vegetative thalli showing a small lobe (arrow). (C) Cross-section view of multistratose thallus showing new thallus (N) superimposed on an old thallus (O). (D) Cross-section view of young thallus with unilateral symmetry and composed of erect perithallial filaments (EF) and hypothallial basal layer (BL). (E) Tufts of hairs (Ha) in pits developed from perithallial erect filaments. (F) Multicellular rhizoids (Rh) on the undersurface. (G) Cross-section view showing reproductive thallus with plurangia (Pl), vegetative filaments (VF), and hypothallial basal layer (BL). (H) Cross-section view of reproductive thallus showing protrusion of plurangial sorus. (I) Plurangial filaments (PF) terminated by sterile cells (SC). (J) Cross-section view of reproductive thallus showing protrusion of unangial sorus. (K) Unangium (Un, on left side) originating from the lateral-basal region to the paraphysis (Pa) and unangia (Un, on central and right side) originating either from unicellular stalks in specialized branching filaments (arrows) with paraphyses (Pa). Scale bars represent: A, 0.5 cm; B & C, 250 μm; D–G, 50 μm; H, 200 μm; I, 20 μm, J, 100 μm; K, 25 μm.
algae-2024-39-2-97f2.jpg
Fig. 3
Morphology of Ramipedicella longicellularis comb. nov. (A) Cross-section view of multistratose plant with new thallus (N) superimposed on an old thallus (O). (B) Cross-section view of thallus composed of erect perithallial filaments (EF), hypothallial basal layer (BL), and multicellular rhizoids (Rh) on the undersurface. (C) Cross-section view of a reproductive thallus showing Unangia within paraphyses (Ul) and vegetative filaments (VF). (D) Unangia (Un) and a sessile empty unangium (EUn) on branched specialized filament, an unangium primordium on stalk (St) and paraphyses (Pa). Scale bars represent: A–C, 50 μm; D, 25 μm.
algae-2024-39-2-97f3.jpg
Fig. 4
Distributions of Ramipedicella miniloba (●) and R. longicellularis (▲) samples corresponding morphological features and DNA sequences in GenBank.
algae-2024-39-2-97f4.jpg
Table 1
Gene sequence divergence value (%) of rbcL (984 bp) and COI-5P (654 bp) between genera of Ralfsiaceae using pairwise distance
Feature 1 2 3 4 5 6
1. Ramipedicella gen. nov. - 17.8–18.9 18.3–20.8 15.5–20.0 - 18.8–19.2
2. Fissipedicella 6.7–7.3 - 20.3–21.4 17.5–19.4 - 19.4
3. Endoplura 7.9–9.3 9.2–10.1 - 20.6–23.8 - 19.4–21.6
4. Ralfsia 6.9–8.8 7.4–8.9 9.2–10.5 - - 18.0–19.9
5. Heteroralfsia 8.1–8.5 9.4 10.7–11.2 7.8–9.3 - -
6. Analipus 7.7–8.3 7.9 9.0–9.5 5.5–7.1 7.7 -

Numbers below and above the diagonal are rbcL and 5′ region of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI-5P), respectively.

Table 2
Comparison of distinguishing characters among Ramipedicella gen. nov., Analipus, Endoplura, Fissipedicella, Heteroralfsia, and Ralfsia within Ralfsiaceae
Feature Ramipedicella gen. nov. Analipus Endoplura Fissipedicella Heteroralfsia Ralfsia
Life history Isomorphic Isomorphic Isomorphic Isomorphic Heteromorphic Isomorphic or direct
Thallus type of sporophyte Crustose Erect Crustose Crustose Erect Crustose
Symmetry / asymmetry of thallus Mostly unilateral, occasionally bilateral Unilateral Straight or unilateral Straight or unilateral Unilateral Unilateral or bilateral
Unistratose / multistratose thalli Multistratose - Unistratose Unistratose - Unistratose or multistratose
No. of chloroplasts per cell Single Single to many Several Single Single Single
Tufts of hairs in pits Present or absent Present Present or absent Present Present Absent
Development of unangia One to several unangia on branched filament stalks / sessile Sessile Sessile or on soral filaments Stalk of 1–6 vertically or obliquely cleaved cells Sessile Sessile or stalk of 1–2 horizontally cleaved cells
No. of plurangial reproductive filaments 1–2 1–2 2–5 1–2 1 1–2
No. of sterile cells in plurangial reproductive filament 1–4 1–3 2–8 1–3 1 1 (to 6)
Reference This study Kjellman (1889), Nelson (1980), Lim et al. (2007) Hollenberg (1969), Tanaka and Chihara (1981b, Lim et al. (2007), Oteng’o et al. (2021) Oteng’o et al. (2023b) Kawai (1989), Lim et al. (2007) Hollenberg (1969), Tanaka and Chihara (1980), Womersley (1987), Parente and Saunders (2019)

REFERENCES

Abbott, I. A. & Hollenberg, G. J. 1976. Marine algae of California. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 827 pp.

Farlow, W. G. 1881. Marine algae of New England and adjacent coast. US Government Printing Office, Washington, 210 pp.

Guiry, M. D. & Guiry, G. M. 2023. AlgaeBase, World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway, Available from: http://www.algaebase.org. Accessed Dec 30, 2023

Hollenberg, G. J. 1969. An account of the Ralfsiaceae (Phaeophyta) of California. J. Phycol. 5:290–301. doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1969.tb02617.x
pmid
Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 17:754–755. doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
crossref pmid pdf
Kawai, H. 1989. Life history and systematic position of Heteroralfsia saxicola gen. et comb. nov. (Ralfsiaceae, Phaeophyceae). Phycologia. 28:243–251. doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-28-2-243.1
crossref
Kjellman, F. R. 1889. Om Beringhafvets algflora [About the Bering Sea algae]. Kongl. Sv. Vet. Acad. Handl. Stockholm. 23:1–58.

Kozhenkova, S. I. 2009. Retrospective analysis of the marine flora of Vostok Bay, Sea of Japan. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 35:263–278. doi.org/10.1134/S1063074009040014
crossref pdf
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35:1547–1549. doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
crossref pmid pmc
Lanfear, R., Frandsen, P. B., Wright, A. M., Senfeld, T. & Calcott, B. 2017. PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34:772–773. doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260
crossref pmid
León-Alvarez, D. & González-González, J. 2003. The morphological distinction of Ralfsia expansa and R. hancockii (Ralfsiaceae, Rhaeophyta) from Mexico. Phycologia. 42:613–621. doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-42-6-613.1
crossref
León-Alvarez, D. & Norris, J. N. 2005. Terminology and position of reproductive structures in crustose brown algae: misapplication, confusion and clarification. Cryptogam. Algol. 26:91–102.

León-Álvarez, D., Reyes-Gómez, V. P., Wynne, M. J., Ponce-Márquez, M. E. & Quiróz-González, N. 2017. Morphological and molecular characterization of Hapalospongidion gelatinosum, Hapalospongidiaceae fam. nov. (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae) from Mexico. Bot. Mar. 60:567–581. doi.org/10.1515/bot-2017-0020

Lim, P. E., Sakaguchi, M., Hanyuda, T., Kogame, K., Phang, S.-M. & Kawai, H. 2007. Molecular phylogeny of crustose brown algae (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae) inferred from rbcL sequences resulting in the proposal for Neoralfsiaceae fam. nov. Phycologia. 46:456–466. doi.org/10.2216/06-90.1
crossref
Nelson, W. A. 1980. Analipus japonicus (Harv.) Wynne (Phaeophyta): studies of its biology and taxonomy. Ph.D. dissertation. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 244 pp.

Oteng’o, A. O., Cho, T. O. & Won, B. Y. 2021. Endoplura jejuensis sp. nov. and Endoplura koreana sp. nov. (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae) from Korea based on molecular and morphological analyses. Algae. 36:155–163. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2021.36.7.22
crossref pdf
Oteng’o, A. O. & Won, B. Y. 2020. Ralfsia longicellularis (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae): a Far East Asian endemic brown alga from Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 38:101–105. doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2020.38.1.101
crossref
Oteng’o, A. O., Won, B. Y. & Cho, T. O. 2022. Proposal for the Sungminiaceae fam. nov. (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae) for Sungminia gen. nov. with three new species based on molecular and morphological analyses. J. Phycol. 58:719–728. doi.org/10.1111/jpy.13280
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Oteng’o, A. O., Won, B. Y. & Cho, T. O. 2023a. Endoplura gyeokpoensis sp. nov. and E. limpeticola sp. nov. (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae), two new crustose brown algae from Korea. Phycologia. 62:445–451. doi.org/10.1080/00318884.2023.2247713
crossref
Oteng’o, A. O., Won, B. Y. & Cho, T. O. 2023b. Fissipedicella orientalis gen. et sp. nov. (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae), a new crustose brown alga from Korea based on molecular and morphological analyses. Algae. 38:173–181. doi.org/10.4490/algae.2023.38.9.9
crossref pdf
Parente, M. I., Fletcher, R. L., Costa, F. O. & Saunders, G. W. 2021. Taxonomic investigation of Ralfsia-like (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae) taxa in the North Atlantic Ocean based on molecular and morphological data, with descriptions of Pseudoralfsiaceae fam. nov., Pseudoralfsia azorica gen. et sp. nov. and Nuchella vesicularis gen. et sp. nov. Eur. J. Phycol. 56:12–23. doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2020.1753245
crossref
Parente, M. I. & Saunders, G. W. 2019. A molecular survey of Ralfsia sensu stricto (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyceae) in Canada uncovers three new species: R. robertii sp. nov., R. tenebris sp. nov., and R. unimaculata sp. nov. Botany. 97:135–147. doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2018-0138
crossref
Perestenko, L. P. 1980. The seaweeds of Peter the Great Bay. Akademia NAUK SSSR, Leningrad, 231 pp.

Rambaut, A. 2012. FigTree, tree figure drawing tool v1.4.0, Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/. Accessed Dec 29, 2023

Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M. A. 2018. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetic using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67:901–904. doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
pmid pmc
Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 19:1572–1574. doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
crossref pmid pdf
Setchell, W. A. & Gardner, N. L. 1924. Phycological contributions, VII. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 13:1–13.

Silberfeld, T., Rousseau, F. & de Reviers, B. 2014. An updated classification of brown algae (Ochrophyta, Phaeophyceae). Cryptogam. Algol. 35:117–156. doi.org/10.7872/crya.v35.iss2.2014.117
crossref
Silvestro, D. & Michalak, I. 2012. raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RaxML. Org. Divers Evol. 12:335–337. doi.org/10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0
crossref pdf
Tanaka, J. & Chihara, M. 1980. Taxonomic study of the Japanese crustose brown algae (2). Ralfsia (Ralfsiaceae, Ralfsiales) (Part 1). J. Jpn. Bot. 55:337–342.

Tanaka, J. & Chihara, M. 1981a. Taxonomic study of the Japanese crustose brown algae (4) Ralfsia (Ralfsiaceae, Ralfsiales) (Part 3). J. Jpn. Bot. 56:97–104.

Tanaka, J. & Chihara, M. 1981b. Taxonomic study of Japanese crustose brown algae (5). Endoplura and Diplura (Ralfsiaceae, Ralfsiales). J. Jpn. Bot. 56:153–160.

Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673–4680. doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
crossref pmid pmc
Womersley, H. B. S. 1987. The marine benthic flora of southern Australia. Part II. South Australian Government Printing Division, Adelaide, 484 pp.

Xiyi, L. & Junfeng, L. 1993. Ralfsia huanghaiensis, a new species of Ralfsia (Ralfsiales, Phaeophyta). Ocenol. Limnol. Sin. 24:172–176.

Editorial Office
[14348] A-1716, Gwangmyeong Trade Center, 72 Iljik-ro Gwangmyeong-si. Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Tel: +82-2-899-5980  Fax: +82-2-899-5922    E-mail: editalgae@gmail.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © The Korean Society of Phycology.                 Developed in M2PI